Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • Donate Now and Keep Us Helping You

     

  • 0

Nexus Letter

Rate this question


Question

Posted

Is this a good nexus letter for ED & Diabetes:

To whom it may concern,

Mr. XXXXX has been examined and found to have Left testicular atrophy. After reviewing his medical records while in the service in 1955, it appears that Mr. XXXX suffered parotitis (mumps) and complicating orchitis, which caused the testicular atrophy. Futhermore, because of the injury to his left knee and prolonged periods of forced inactivity, Mr. XXXX developed obesity which greatly contributed to the development of his diabetes.

Sincerely

Dr. XXXXXXX

If this is not a good nexus letter for both please let me know as to why. Thanks in advance for your replies.

  • Answers 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder
Posted

I can't tell you exactly but the Dr should make reference to any published articles/writings that bring him to this conclusion. Also he should review and state that he reviewed any and all records since 1955 to current date. He needs to explain why he has drawn these conclusions. jmo

pr

Is this a good nexus letter for ED & Diabetes:

To whom it may concern,

Mr. XXXXX has been examined and found to have Left testicular atrophy. After reviewing his medical records while in the service in 1955, it appears that Mr. XXXX suffered parotitis (mumps) and complicating orchitis, which caused the testicular atrophy. Futhermore, because of the injury to his left knee and prolonged periods of forced inactivity, Mr. XXXX developed obesity which greatly contributed to the development of his diabetes.

Sincerely

Dr. XXXXXXX

If this is not a good nexus letter for both please let me know as to why. Thanks in advance for your replies.

  • HadIt.com Elder
Posted

Charleese,

I don't know if it is good or not, but here is something I have linked on my website. Maybe it will help you.

http://veteransinfo.tripod.com/nexus2.pdf

I wish you good journey.

fanaticbooks

www.howtoassemblevaclaims.com

A free guide for researching, organizing and assembling a va claim. Now upgraded to include suggestions for VONAPP and Social Security Disability.

Posted

"Futhermore, because of the injury to his left knee and prolonged periods of forced inactivity, Mr. XXXX developed obesity which greatly contributed to the development of his diabetes."

If this is to service connected diabetes as secondary to a SC left knee injury, I think the doc needs a much strong medical rationale then that.

The VA could use any other contributing factors to rule out this part of the opinion.

But it is perhaps possible.

I saw a widow's claim years ago in which the veteran died of NSC heart disease and had SC hearing loss.

She proved the SC HL (due to vertigo from it)made him so sedentary that he got no exercise and thus it contributed to his heart disease.

The BVA awarded DIC.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Posted

I would have to agree with Berta. JMO, but I think even a good IMO would still make it hard to fly. Again, to many contributing factors the VA can use against him. I think he would have a better chance if he claimed depression was the factor, but then again, that would still be an up hill battle. Anyway's, Good Luck!

!!!BROKEN ARROW!!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Matrev earned a badge
      First Post
    • Patrol Agent earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Patrol Agent earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Patrol Agent earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Grey Goose went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Our picks

    • From CCK-Law.com

      VA Disability Payment Schedule for 2025

      VA Disability Rates 2025
      • 2 replies
    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 1 review
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 reviews
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use