Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • Donate Now and Keep Us Helping You

     

  • 0

Cola - Hr 1407 And S 894

Rate this question


Question

  • Content Curator/HadIt.com Elder
Posted

I received the attached letter from the DAV. It details pending COLA legislation in the House and Senate: COLA - HR 1407 and S 894.

COLA - HR 1407 and S 894.pdf

"If it's stupid but works, then it isn't stupid."
- From Murphy's Laws of Combat

Disclaimer: I am not a legal expert, so use at own risk and/or consult a qualified professional representative. Please refer to existing VA laws, regulations, and policies for the most up to date information.

 

  • Answers 17
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder
Posted

WHEREAS, ETC-it says nothing which sounds about right. The COLA is what it is & 50,000 resolutions won't change it. Sorry, just saying this is waste of two sheets of paper..JMHO

  • Content Curator/HadIt.com Elder
Posted

Yeah, we see resolutions like this all the time. This is the first time the DAV has felt it was important enough to actually email me something not related to claims. :biggrin:

"If it's stupid but works, then it isn't stupid."
- From Murphy's Laws of Combat

Disclaimer: I am not a legal expert, so use at own risk and/or consult a qualified professional representative. Please refer to existing VA laws, regulations, and policies for the most up to date information.

 

  • HadIt.com Elder
Posted (edited)

They are asking for the raise which would be higher for disabled vets either the COLA determineed by the CPI or the percentage that Congress raises pay for military members which ever would be greater in each year, I think we all know that is in response to the fact that we haven't had a COLA in 2 years

but given the mood to cut spending in Congress I don't see the votes being there to pass this

Edited by Testvet

100% SC P&T PTSD 100% CAD 10% Hypertension and A&A = SMC L, SSD
a disabled American veteran certified lol
"A journey of a thousand miles must begin with a single step."

  • HadIt.com Elder
Posted

Yeah, we see resolutions like this all the time. This is the first time the DAV has felt it was important enough to actually email me something not related to claims. :biggrin:

regardless of how much it cost them to mail out to all their members they want everyone to know they are "fighting" trying to get the members and other disabled vets the highest pay raises they can they must have felt the need to toot their own horn

100% SC P&T PTSD 100% CAD 10% Hypertension and A&A = SMC L, SSD
a disabled American veteran certified lol
"A journey of a thousand miles must begin with a single step."

  • HadIt.com Elder
Posted

Kind of like the Congress asking every year to allow Disabled Vets to fly standby. Just another dog and pony show.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

  • Lead Moderator
Posted

Yep...the DAV "fighting for Vets". Im pretty glad the DAV is ineffective, or else we would not be able to have lawyers, as the DAV opposed them. I bet Mr. Cleveland Burns is glad he got a lawyer. He is the Vet the VA declared incompetent and then VA fiduciaries obsconded with all his money, or, at least until Katrina Eagle started fighting for him. While lawyers are not for everyone, I dont beleive I want the DAV trying to see to it that I cant hire one if I see fit. It is pretty incredible, and rather ironic that we Vets have fought so that others can get representation when accused of a crime, but the DAV thinks we dont need it, we have the DAV. If the DAV was so good at getting benefits for us, then why are there a million Vets still waiting?

The VA doesnt think Vets need lawyers, either. Ok good...then they need to fire their 400 or so lawyers and pay that money they save to Veterans benefits. Now I like that idea. Then, Vets would not need lawyers. The VA wants us to go against their lawyers unrepresented, or represented by a VSO whose rent is paid by the VA. And we wonder why VSO's are like puppets? If someone paid your rent, would you do them a favor once in a while?

Im not quite ready to run out and spend the money the DAV is lobbying to get for us.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Matrev earned a badge
      First Post
    • Patrol Agent earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Patrol Agent earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Patrol Agent earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Grey Goose went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Our picks

    • From CCK-Law.com

      VA Disability Payment Schedule for 2025

      VA Disability Rates 2025
      • 2 replies
    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 1 review
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 reviews
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use