Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • Donate Now and Keep Us Helping You

     

  • 0

Lettter From Va Nehmer Vs...

Rate this question


Question

Posted

The VA sent me a letter a few months back about making a claim based on Nehmer Vs Dept of Veteran Affairs and if I didn't want to submit a claim to ignore the letter-which I did. Now they sent me recently another letter setting me up for an exam regarding the subject court case. I don't know why, I filed for heart condition in "85 when I got out of the military and it was denied and I let it go. I had hypertension and chest pain in thes ervice and underwent a ETT which was abnormal/borerline and it was suggestive of CAD (Coronary artery disease) but not proven. Now after so many years have gone by I'm sure with the high blood pressure that I have CAD an that in some degree is associated with Ischemic heart Disease (IHD). Does anyone know why the VA screwballs want an exam on me? I don't believe it's to my benefit except to undergo the cardiac testing and find out that I have some sort of heart problem that they might render medicine to control. Please, someone reply, thanks.

  • Answers 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

Posted

I am guessing that your "VA screwballs" are following the Nehmer Decision and specifically the implementing requirements in the Federal Register http://edocket.acces...f/2010-6549.pdf . Based on some somewhat less than stellar early Rating Decisions on this issue and some "additional training", I'm guessing that the VBA is taking a more liberal view of the claimants and the Nehmer class.

You state that you filed a claim for a heart condition in 1985, and I am presuming that you have verifiable boots-on-the ground Vietnam service that could potentially make you a part of the Nehmer class.

So, .... from what you wrote and with some astute guessing on my part, I'd say that whichever VARO is processing your inferred Nehmer class IHD/CAD claim is trying to verify a current diagnosis of IHD/CAD. Even though you claimed some sort of vague heart condition in 1985 that was denied, it doesn't matter for purposes of the Nehmer decision.

If you are so adamant that you don't want service connection for IHD/CAD,

a. Don't go to the C&P.

b. Send a letter to the VARO stating that you DO NOT WANT ANY CLAIM FOR IHD/CAD UNDER NEHMER TO PROCEED AND TO CANCEL THE CLAIM IMMEDIATELY.

However, I suggest that you proceed with the claim.

The VA sent me a letter a few months back about making a claim based on Nehmer Vs Dept of Veteran Affairs and if I didn't want to submit a claim to ignore the letter-which I did. Now they sent me recently another letter setting me up for an exam regarding the subject court case. I don't know why, I filed for heart condition in "85 when I got out of the military and it was denied and I let it go. I had hypertension and chest pain in thes ervice and underwent a ETT which was abnormal/borerline and it was suggestive of CAD (Coronary artery disease) but not proven. Now after so many years have gone by I'm sure with the high blood pressure that I have CAD an that in some degree is associated with Ischemic heart Disease (IHD). Does anyone know why the VA screwballs want an exam on me? I don't believe it's to my benefit except to undergo the cardiac testing and find out that I have some sort of heart problem that they might render medicine to control. Please, someone reply, thanks.

Interested

causalobserver8@aol.com

Posted

JOHN 6012,

Depending on the outcome of your C&P exam, the benefit to you could be a rather sizable deposit in your bank account plus SC for IHD. And I don't know of too many older folks who mind popping a pill or two to keep the ticker going.

SEMPER FI

ONCE A MARINE, ALWAYS A MARINE

Posted

I'll go ahead and go thru the exam because I want to find out if there is an underlying heart condition. I suspect there is an it'd relieve my mind if thre were and it could be medicated. Yep, had boots on the ground in South Vietnam so that must be why I'm being recalled....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

  • Our picks

    • From CCK-Law.com

      VA Disability Payment Schedule for 2025

      VA Disability Rates 2025
      • 2 replies
    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 1 review
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 reviews
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use