Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • Donate Now and Keep Us Helping You

     

  • 0

Disability Payments Aren’T Part Of Garnishment Calculations

Rate this question


Question

  • Moderator
Posted (edited)

Vermont High Court: Disability Payments Aren't Part Of Garnishment Calculations. Leagle, Inc. The Supreme Court of Vermont, in Cote v. Cote, decided August 12, overturned a lower court's inclusion of veterans' disability payments within the total income of a husband whose Social Security payments were being garnished after he failed to make court-ordered alimony payments. The Federal Consumer Credit Protection Act caps at 55% the percentage of aggregate disposal earnings that may be garnished; by including the husband's monthly $2,721 veterans' disability payment within its calculation of his aggregate disposal earnings, the lower court had garnished his entire $1,569 Social Security payment. The state Supreme Court ruled, however, that veterans' disability payments were not "remuneration for employment" within the meaning of federal law, and therefore should not be counted. As a result, 55% of the husband's Social Security payment was all that could be garnished.

http://www.veteranst...ans-stories-28/

Edited by pacmanx1

My intentions are to help, my advice maybe wrong, be your own advocate and know what is in your C-File and the 38 CFR that governs your disabilities and conditions.

Do your own homework. No one knows the veteran’s symptoms like the veteran. Never Give Up.

I do not give my consent for anyone to view my personal VA records.

 

  • Answers 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • Lead Moderator
Posted

I would say this is good, but the problem is that only a few of us live in Vermont. I understand that excluding Veterans disability compensation from garnishment is kinda left up to individual banks. While it is usually wrong, the Veterean, after his money had been garnished away, probably cant afford a lawyer to fight it, and the banks know this. So it continues. An unenforced law has little effect.

Posted

i would say this, when my disablity rating increased 4 years ago, the paperwork included with the rating decision clearly states that disability compensation is exempt from creditors. i would think that would include alimony payments, regardless of state. perhaps, i'm wrong.

btw, the paperwork i received with my recent depression determination said the same thing.

Posted

There is a great deal of BS on the net about this subject. There is also a great deal of misinformation out there.

Here is a trove of accurate information:

http://www.vawatchdo...ld_Support.html

Here is some legal discussion:

http://www.disabilit...ony-divorce.cfm

Just make sure you know what you are doing before you do it.

bandido60: You are totally wrong on a number of levels. VA and SSA compensation is very well protected in a bank. SSA recipients who get paid by check are receiving a letter this month that states that they must either get a bank account for direct deposit or they will be issued a government "debit card."

Look here for the protections:

http://www.creditcar...-funds-1282.php

Basically, the bank must protect funds in your account from seizure up to an amount equal to two months payments even if the funds have been co-mingled with other funds. It is the bank's responsibility to identify and protect exempt funds.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Matrev earned a badge
      First Post
    • Patrol Agent earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Patrol Agent earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Patrol Agent earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Grey Goose went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Our picks

    • From CCK-Law.com

      VA Disability Payment Schedule for 2025

      VA Disability Rates 2025
      • 2 replies
    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 1 review
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 reviews
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use