Jump to content
  • veteranscrisisline-badge-chat-1.gif

  • Advertisemnt

  • Trouble Remembering? This helped me.

    I have memory problems and as some of you may know I highly recommend Evernote and have for years. Though I've found that writing helps me remember more. I ran across Tom's videos on youtube, I'm a bit geeky and I also use an IPad so if you take notes on your IPad or you are thinking of going paperless check it out. I'm really happy with it, I use it with a program called Noteshelf 2.

    Click here to purchase your digital journal. HadIt.com receives a commission on each purchase.

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims


    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   


  • Advertisemnt

  • VA Watchdog

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

  • 0
Sign in to follow this  
mountain tyme

Re-Opening A Closed Claim That Was Denied


Hello, I hope everyone is well. I need an opinion to this claim. A friend of mine asked me if her husband John can re-open two closed claims that were both denied based on a letter they received last week from his Cardiologist.

Here is a little history of his claim.

John put in two claims with the VA for comp. one was for sleep apnea denied 3 years ago because it was not diagnosed while in service or within the 1 year window after retirement. It was diagnosed a little over 2 years later after retirement.

Second claim was for HTN this was denied because the VA stated that “after a 5 day b/p check high b/p was not detected.

What I read in his service military records was that in 87 his

b/p was within HTN levels and the doctor requested a 5 day check . The next medical note made right after that request was made 8 mo. after that appointment with no mention of a 5 day check or a check at all. By this time he had pcs and forgot all about it, he actually said he never recalled the doctor asking for him to have a check done and no mention of high b/p.

In 1988 he ended up in the Cardiac ICU unit at the local hospital the AF base emergency room had his transported there do to arterial fib. 3 days later he was released because it resolved on it’s own. Noted was that the Civilian hospital ICU Cardiologists requested firmly that a catherazation be done to rule out CAD the test was not done due to the base hospital stating It would be performed at a base hospital the test was never done.

A year after that again during a yearly physical again another doctor wrote in his records HTN? Again a 5 day b/p was requested again after reviewing his records I did not see where it was done and neither my girl friend or her husband was aware that the doctor even thought he might have had High b/p.

Her husband did request to see the 5 day checks from the VA since that is why he was denied HTN and that was 2 years ago. Still waiting to see where they found those tests.

Now for the new development.

Last year John had to have a pacemaker put in due to slow heart beats…during his check up his Cardiologist asked him to bring in all his medical records pertaining to stress tests ect. John brought in a copy of his service medical records. After he review them he called John a few days before the pacemaker implantation and asked him if he was ever placed on high blood pressure medicine while active duty or if he was asked about his sleeping habits because of his tension headaches and fatigue he said no they told him he had migraines.

Also in John Medical records were the 5 buddy statements he received from men he shared quarters with thought out his AF career and they wrote that he would snore so loudly that they could hear him down the hall and one of his supervisor wrote a statement that John would come to work often fatigued and he remembered going tdy with him a few times and he did snore so loudly that he had to pay to have a room of his own because he couldn't get a good night rest.

But he was diagnosis with sleep apnea 2 years after he retired from the AF.

When John was sent a copy of his Cardiologist report the doctor put an Addendum to his report it states

“Mr. xxxx has snored loudly his whole life. His neck size has been greater then 17 inches (a strong correlate with sleep apnea risk) since he has been 20 years of age. During his time in the military (he was in the military until 19xx) he had untreated sleep apnea. His untreated sleep apnea likely contributed to his ultimately development of hypertension, symptomatic bradycardia and need for permanent pacemaker implantation.

If you have any questions please contact me."


Dr. xxxxxxxxxx MD

(This Cardiologist is well known and is best known for his studies in the field of cardiovascular medicine, he also is a professor who teaches at universities about cutting edge developments in his field)

So would this addendum be enough to re-open his two closed claims would this addendum be considered new and material evidence?

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

Maybe this will help:

YOu do not need to prove "CUE" to reopen based on N and M Evidence. You simply need new and material evidence. Read especially 38CFR 3.156 a, b, and c.

Do remember this, tho: When you reopen due to N and M evidence, you "lose" your original effective date, and your effective date becomes the date you reopened the claim due to N and M evidence.

In order to "preserve" your effective date there are a few methods:

1. 38CFR 3.156 C The way you preserve your effective date here is that this is new "SERVICE records". If its New evidence, then the effective date is not preserved, if its new service records its preserved. Keep this in mind when you reopen.

2. Regular, timely filed appeals. This is not an option if your RO decision was over a year ago. An appeal, if successfull, will revert back to the original filing date AND you are allowed to submit additional evidence in support of your claim, regardless of the date of the evidence.

3. CUE. There are many resources on hadit for CUE.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is another thing about having a doctor state he has reviewed the vet's SMR's. You better actually have a copy of your SMR's in your possession. The VA can get picky and claim that unless you can prove you have a copy of C-File, SMR's etc that you don't actually have them.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tell him to request a copy of his C file from the VA regional office where his claim was processed, or where his file is now.

Those records will show him what the VA looked at when deciding his claim.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Specific to sleep apnea. I have a BVA claim on my computer in which the SMR was silent for any symptoms, diagnoses or treatment for sleep apnea. However, the veteran stated that he snored loudly while in the military. He did not even have buddy letters. The case was awarded based on the fact that the veteran can testify to a fact that he snored while in the military.

The issue is whether or not this will be direct service connection or a CUE. And as Broncovet pointed out what will the effective date be.

See this case.


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to clarify. I am familar with cases that were awarded for sleep apnea based on less evidence than what you added to the file since the prior denial. I am assuming the buddy letters were added after the previous denial. The letter from the doctor should be considered new and material. The buddy letters should be sufficient without the letter from the doctor to make the initial sleep apnea claim. However, do not be surprised if they pick it apart at the RO. If so, then you might have to get the doctor to be more specific as to the manner in how his determination was made.

When I filed my angioedema claim the law was quite different and I was required to show an inservice diagnosis, post service diagnosis and a nexus prior to the VA's duty to develop the claim was applicable. I got a letter from the head of immunology at a VA hospital who had been there for thirty years and performed C&P exams. I thought the letter was a slam dunk. It was denied by he RO stating the examiner did not read one medical report that was in the file. The report the doctor did not read was completely irrelevant. Also they claimed that the the doctor based his determination on my subjective statements. The doctor clearly stated that he made the determination based on the results of numerous blood studies. I was awarded by a DRO after pointing out that the doctor made his determination based on blood studies and that the report he did not read was for a different and unrelated condition.

Good Morning Ho2py...actual the buddy statements were part of the original claim I believe there 5 from veterans who where stationed with him in which one was a room mate and the other was his supervisor who was stationed with him on two different tours. The other 3 were also living in the dorms with him who could hear him sorning...the other one was from his wife and the other his eldest son who is also in the military at this time. The VA denied the claim because there was no diagnosis in his SMR....I think the vet is honest and I feel for him but as I told him that I have viewed some claims that the veteran medical records were quite clear that they had a condition and were still denied...it is not an easy process and dealing with the VA you have to have patience and determination...and a VALID claim. I think his claim is valid just not strong. Thank you so much for your insight.

God Speed MT

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Ads

  • Our picks

    • Rating "Protections"
      The VA has several regulations governing various levels of "protection". The terms "permanent", "protection", and "total" are misnomers due to the various ways the VA has defined them.

      Here is some information on VA ratings protection (but the word "protection" has a different meaning to the VA). The exception to these rules is if they can prove fraud.

      5 years

      The key part to remember about the 5 year rule is found 3.327(a) indicating that these are guidelines which are not necessarily set in stone. The key takeaway for most veterans is reduction should not occur if there has not been material improvement over 5+ years or if the veteran is over the age of 55.


      10 years

      In brief, ratings in effect for 10 years cannot have service connection severed.


      20 years

      In brief, a disability rated for 20 years cannot be reduced below the lowest rating percentage it has held for the previous 20 years.








      Disclaimer: I am not a legal expert, so use at own risk and/or consult a professional representative. The VA updates their regulations from time to time, so this information may become outdated.
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 7 replies
    • Everything Veterans Affairs does with your service connected disability compensation claim, is governed by law. You may want to bookmark this page as a reference as you proceed with your claim.

      It can be a bit daunting. Just remember the U.S.C. is the law, the C.F.R. is how they interpret the law and last but certainly not least is the V.A. adjudication manuals that is how they apply the law. The section of the law that covers the veterans benefits is Title 38 in the U.S.C. in the C.F.R. is usually written 38 C.F.R. or something similar.

      It's helpful to understand how statutes, regulations, and VA directives such as the VA’s Adjudication Procedures Manual, the M21-1MR (Manual M21-1MR.) are related. Of these three sources of law, the statute, written by Congress, is the highest form. The statute that governs veterans’ benefits is found in Title 38 of the United States Code (U.S.C.). The VA writes regulations to carry out the laws written by Congress; these are found in Title 38 of the Code of Federal Regulations (C.F.R.). The VA’s internal instructions for adjudicating claims are contained in the Manual M21-1MR. VA regulations may not conflict with any statute; the manual’s provisions may not conflict with either statute or regulations. If they do, the Court has the power to invalidate them.


      U.S.C. United States Code United States Code is the law and the U.S.C. is the governments official copy of the code.

      U.S.C.A. United States Code Annotated U.S.C.A. contain everything that is printed in the official U.S. Code but also include annotations to case law relevant to the particular statute.

      C.F.R. Code of Federal Regulations The C.F.R. is the interpretation of the law

      VA M-21 Compensation and Pension Manual

      VA M-21-4 C & P Procedures

      VA M28-3 Vocational Rehabilitation

      VA M29-1 VBA Insurance Manual
      • 0 replies
    • HadIt.com Branded 11oz Coffee Mug for sale
      11oz Coffee Mug with HadIt.com Logo and Motto $12
      • 0 replies
    • Show your support with HadIt.com logo items. Only a few to start, t-shirts and ball caps coming https://hadit.com/shop/ Can holder, Coffee Mugs and Notebook currently come take a look and check back https://hadit.com/shop/

      • 0 replies
    • I was unable to find a reply box to your post.

      We have a full Agent Orange forum here.

      Many veterans (and even their survivors) have succeeded in getting a disability, not on the presumptive list, service connected due to their proven exposure to AO.

      Also Secretary Wilkie is considering a few new presumptives, but we have no idea if  he will even add any to the list.

      I wrote to him making a strong argument, as  to the potential for HBP to be added, as well as ischemic stroke and have prepared a personal claim based on the same report a veteran used at the BVA, who also had a strong IMO/IME, and the BVA recently granted his HBP as due to his exposure to AO in Vietnam.

      Most veterans with HBP were deemed as having "essential" - a medical term for no know cause- now we have a cause in Vietnam veterans---AO caused it.


      The report is here:


      On page 8 they found there is "Sufficient" evidence that AO caused HBP in Vietnam veterans.

      The BVA case and this report is also searchable in our AO forum.



      • 0 replies
  • Ads

  • Popular Contributors

  • Ad

  • Latest News
  • Create New...

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines