Jump to content
  • Donation Box

    Please donate to support the community.
    We appreciate all donations!
  • Advertisemnt

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims

    questions-001@3x.png

    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
     
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   

    tinnitus-005.pngptsd-005.pnglumbosacral-005.pngscars-005.pnglimitation-flexion-knee-005.pngdiabetes-005.pnglimitation-motion-ankle-005.pngparalysis-005.pngdegenerative-arthitis-spine-005.pngtbi-traumatic-brain-injury-005.png

  • Advertisemnt

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

Sponsored Ads

  •  ad-free-subscription-002.jpeg     fund-the-site.jpg

  • Searches Community Forums, Blog and more

  • 0
cooter

Ever Which Way

Question

When in the process filing out a claim, and trying to explain how a secondary is related to a SC issue, would it be reasonable to state all the factors that contributed to the making of the secondary to form?

The reason I ask, concerns the credibility and the amount of evidence the rater is going to need to justify his/her decision. For example;

>>>>>>"Due to the aggravation from my SC knee, has contributed to me falling and ambulating with an abnormal gait thru out the years, which has resulted in the injuries of my lower back"<<<<<<

Since it's already proven that abnormal gaits do aggravate other parts of the body, and falling could injure any part of the body, would it be more advantageous to just state the abnormal gait, with evidence in the claim, due to the fact I don.t have any evidence relating a back injury to a fall, even tho I do have medical evidence of falling due to the SC knee?

I apologize for this post being longer than it should, but I wanted to make sure everything is covered so hopefully there wouldn't any doubts when responding.

Coot

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

I believe that if you don't ask and don't spell out your claim to the VARO you will get nothing from them except denial.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ad

Often, the RO needs to be led by the nose through the claim. Besides that, in general, your statements should be backed up with medical evidence and a medical opinion from a well qualified doctor, preferably one "board certified" as a specialist in the area of concern. RO's often just "blow off" veteran's and "lay" statements. It may take a BVA appeal to get them given the level of importance required by law. Virtually nothing is "already proven", from the RO's viewpoint.

Edited by Chuck75

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Virtually nothing is "already proven", from the RO's viewpoint.

You defiantly have a point there!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe that if you don't ask and don't spell out your claim to the VARO you will get nothing from them except denial.

I take it then, go ahead with every bit of evidence and go with it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Ads

  • Ad

  • Latest News
  • Our picks

    • I filed for my mitral valve regurgitation heart disease secondary to a service-connected condition on 7-30-18. It was granted on 8-30-18. Since I filed for this heart valve issue and was awarded, can I still file for hypertension ? I have been seeing comments that you should file for hypertension first and file for heart disease as a secondary. Can I file for hypertension as a secondary to my heart disease ? I am alittle confused on this matter.

      Dan
    • How to Change the Theme - Look and Colors
      How to Change the Theme - Look and Colors
      • 5 replies
    • For Calculating Retro

      VA Disability Compensation Rates 2012 | 2011 | 2010-2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999

      Prior to 1999 check here https://www.hadit.com/va-disability-compensation-rates-historic-for-retro-calculation/
      • 0 replies
    • I am a 100% disabled veteran, At first I was super excited to find out I am getting retro pay for back benefits to 2006. But that was over 2 months ago. I been waiting and waiting and calling to ask them wheres my back pay. They first told me "one month" than I call again. The guy started reading a script of basically "we are malingering on paying you" type crap. I was wondering if there is any number I can call besides that 800-827-1000 number to inquire about my status. I don't know why its taken so long when there is specific information telling them from the judge that VA owes. 

      There was a remanded to see if I was eligible for IU (I get it now since 2014 im actually 90% with 10 of that been IU). I been on SS since 2004. Can Someone help me out? Thank you
      • 6 replies
    • You might have a 38 CFR 3.156 situation-

      meaning the VA might have considered your claim in 95/96 as "not well grounded" and failed to even get your STRs.Or they did get your STRs but never considered the specific entry you cited here.

      Lots of discussion under a search, of 38 CFR. 3.156 (a)(b) (c) ---here is a winner:

      https://community.hadit.com/topic/52994-cue-in-failing-to-apply-the-provisions-of-38-cfr-§-3156c-for-effective-date/

      o

       
        • Thanks
×

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines