Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • Donate Now and Keep Us Helping You

     

  • 0

Vbm

Rate this question


Question

  • HadIt.com Elder
Posted

I got my 2005 VBM today, but I had asked for the 2006 edition. I called LexisNexis and they are sending me the 2006 and told me to keep the 2005. Just from looking at a number of topics I see how badly represented I have been by the service organizations. The VA simply ignores most of the rules in CFR 38 until someone catches them. Every one of my decisions has errors.

  • Answers 8
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Guest allanopie
Posted

>The VA simply ignores most of the rules in CFR 38 until someone catches them. Every one of my decisions has errors.

Hello John,

Everyone of these agencys need oversite & acountibility, including the DOD & the DVA. Does the GAO or DOJ have any weight to bare on the DVA when it comes to adherence to law?

Did you get the discs or does it come in paperback?

  • HadIt.com Elder
Posted

CBS National News did a piece on how Military is not helping returning Veterans who may have PTSD. The Commanding Officer should work for the VA with the crappy answer he gave.

Both of the men interviewed were decorated soldiers who had been busted from E-4 to privates and were about to be kicked out of the Army. Their Civilian Shrink said they had PTSD big time.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Posted

Hello John,

you said...

"The VA simply ignores most of the rules in CFR 38 until someone catches them. Every one of my decisions has errors."

your post makes me really think a congressional inquiry is in order, even if it just makes them look at what there doing a little harder... maybe they will get it right!

mmmm…Looks like the VA is tryin to serve up some… today.

Posted
your post makes me really think a congressional inquiry is in order

That will never happen, look at the 26 million vets who had information stolen on the VA computer. It's sweep under the rug.

John, how did you go about getting the book?

Guest allanopie
Posted

>Both of the men interviewed were decorated soldiers who had been busted from E-4 to privates and were about to be kicked out of the Army. Their Civilian Shrink said they had PTSD big time.

Your going to get allot of dieing homeless vets come winter, if something isn't done soon. These vets deserve to be treated & cared for. If the VA refuses to get on the ball & pick these vets up the DOD is tossing out, you may have a good many vets in the streets next winter.

Please don't ASSUME the Dept of Veterans Affairs or the DOD will take care of it, without Congressional & US Court persuasion.

  • HadIt.com Elder
Posted

Allan

I got the paperback VBM. I went to the LexisNexis bookstore. I got the 800 number and called them to ask for the 2006. I wanted to read about CUE but all these other subjects jumped out at me. I read how the VA cannot change a diagnosis without a explanation. They changed my diagnosis based strictly on what a guy at a C&P exam said with no explanation. I read about inferred claims. At no time has the VA in my region every done anything on an inferred claim unless the veterans files a formal or informal claim himself. They don't abide by the bilateral factor rule. What really gets me is that the DAV lets this sloppy work go by and could care less. I had an inferred claim for TDIU in 1973 and the VA just ignored it. I had inferred claims for DMII and PN and the VA ignored it until I filed a claim.

I read about the soldiers who are being mistreated for having PTSD. I talked to my psychologist yesterday. He works with the spill over from MacDill AFB. He believes the AF at least is hiding the number of PTSD cases by sending these guys back to duty and keeping them in the service. Officially, the military is saying everyone with PTSD or mental problems should seek help, but in reality, when they do seek help their careers are over and they become shitbirds. The soldiers start to have symptoms and they end up at the wrong end of a court martial for drug abuse etc.

John

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • AFguy1999 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Grey Goose earned a badge
      First Post
    • Matrev earned a badge
      First Post
    • Patrol Agent earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Patrol Agent earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • From CCK-Law.com

      VA Disability Payment Schedule for 2025

      VA Disability Rates 2025
      • 2 replies
    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 1 review
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 reviews
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use