Jump to content
  • Donation Box

    Please donate to support the community.
    We appreciate all donations!
  • Advertisemnt

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims

    questions-001@3x.png

    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
     
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   

    tinnitus-005.pngptsd-005.pnglumbosacral-005.pngscars-005.pnglimitation-flexion-knee-005.pngdiabetes-005.pnglimitation-motion-ankle-005.pngparalysis-005.pngdegenerative-arthitis-spine-005.pngtbi-traumatic-brain-injury-005.png

  • Advertisemnt

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

Sponsored Ads

  •  ad-free-subscription-002.jpeg     fund-the-site.jpg

  • Searches Community Forums, Blog and more

  • 0

Question

There is a lot to FTCA claims.

I have been watching the Conrad Murray trial diligently.

The prime focus of a FTCA case is to prove that the VA did not meet a 'usual standard of care'=that being the same standard of care in the 'usual medical community.'and that these 'acts' or 'omissions of acts' caused additional disability or death to the veteran.

That was the sole focus of each FTCA charge I made in my case.The VA Peer reviews concurred.

AT first they denied but I aggressively fought back-I had good weapons (the medical records were all I really needed)

The Murray trial had a cardio doc and a Sleep Study expert on last week- as witness for the prosecution (regarding Michael Jackson's death)

Monday the state is calling their last witness but the testimonies have been re shown on CNN this wee3kend.

The cardio and sleep study doc gave a step by step statement as to 6 areas in which Jackson's doctor (Murray) did not meet a reasonable standard of medical care.As a matter of fact the doctor made "gross deviations" from that care.

My chilling Sec 1151 award letter ends with a statement that makes this same point.

Anyone with a med malpractice case or Sec 1151 claim before the VA should watch this trial.

After last state's witness, the defense will lay out their case.

These televised trials can be great learning experiences.

The standard of proper medical care is the same standard for the VA as for any private doctor or hospital whether the malpractice victim is Michael Jackson or anyone else.

I dont agree with those who think the charges against Murray should have been murder one or two.He had no malice of forethought when he treated MJ. MJ was his cash cow.There was no intent.I dealt with negligence/malpractice and then a VA cover up of that negligence- a different ball game.

But still

this trial reveals exactly what proof is needed to prove negligence/malpractice for Section 1151s as well as FTCA cases.

Some 1151 claims succeed because of an unexpected serious medical result from a med or a surgical procedure.

Some succeed because there is medical evidence outside the VA that a specific procedure has caused additional complications known to the standard medical community.

Some 1151 claims should be also claimed as secondaries to an established SC as well as under 1151.

"deviations" from standard medical practices, with serious results are bonafide malpractice issues as the Murray trial shows.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

0 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

There have been no answers to this question yet

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Ads

  • Ad

  • Latest News
  • Our picks

    • I filed for my mitral valve regurgitation heart disease secondary to a service-connected condition on 7-30-18. It was granted on 8-30-18. Since I filed for this heart valve issue and was awarded, can I still file for hypertension ? I have been seeing comments that you should file for hypertension first and file for heart disease as a secondary. Can I file for hypertension as a secondary to my heart disease ? I am alittle confused on this matter.

      Dan
    • How to Change the Theme - Look and Colors
      How to Change the Theme - Look and Colors
      • 5 replies
    • For Calculating Retro

      VA Disability Compensation Rates 2012 | 2011 | 2010-2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999

      Prior to 1999 check here https://www.hadit.com/va-disability-compensation-rates-historic-for-retro-calculation/
      • 0 replies
    • I am a 100% disabled veteran, At first I was super excited to find out I am getting retro pay for back benefits to 2006. But that was over 2 months ago. I been waiting and waiting and calling to ask them wheres my back pay. They first told me "one month" than I call again. The guy started reading a script of basically "we are malingering on paying you" type crap. I was wondering if there is any number I can call besides that 800-827-1000 number to inquire about my status. I don't know why its taken so long when there is specific information telling them from the judge that VA owes. 

      There was a remanded to see if I was eligible for IU (I get it now since 2014 im actually 90% with 10 of that been IU). I been on SS since 2004. Can Someone help me out? Thank you
      • 6 replies
    • You might have a 38 CFR 3.156 situation-

      meaning the VA might have considered your claim in 95/96 as "not well grounded" and failed to even get your STRs.Or they did get your STRs but never considered the specific entry you cited here.

      Lots of discussion under a search, of 38 CFR. 3.156 (a)(b) (c) ---here is a winner:

      https://community.hadit.com/topic/52994-cue-in-failing-to-apply-the-provisions-of-38-cfr-§-3156c-for-effective-date/

      o

       
        • Thanks
×

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines