Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules
- 0
Prejudicial Error /remandable Error
Rate this question
-
Tell a friend
-
Recent Achievements
-
Our picks
-
2025 VA Disability Compensation Rates an Pay Dates
Tbird posted a question in VA Disability Claims Research,
Picked By
Tbird, -
VA Disability Claims: 5 Game-Changing Precedential Decisions You Need to Know
Tbird posted a record in VA Claims and Benefits Information,
These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.
Service Connection
Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected.
Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.
Effective Dates
Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.
Rating Issues
Continue Reading on HadIt.com-
- 1 review
Picked By
Tbird, -
-
Are all military medical records on file at the VA?
RichardZ posted a topic in How to's on filing a Claim,
I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful. We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did. He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims. He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file. It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to 1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015. It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me. He didn't want my copies. Anyone have any information on this. Much thanks in advance.-
- 4 replies
Picked By
RichardZ, -
-
Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
Tbird posted a record in VA Claims and Benefits Information,
Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL
This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:
Current Diagnosis. (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)
In-Service Event or Aggravation.
Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”-
- 0 reviews
Picked By
Tbird, -
-
Post in ICD Codes and SCT CODES?WHAT THEY MEAN?
Timothy cawthorn posted an answer to a question,
Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability ratingPicked By
yellowrose, -
-
Question
Berta
I have been reading remands of widow's claims at the BVA-
Some widows received a letter like I did for more evidence but the letter did not comply with the VCAA nor was it a real VCAA letter.
I think a real VCAA letter has check boxes and they send pamphlets-
The BVA stated this to be a remandable error-and in some cases, a prejudicial error-and remanded on that basis.
One BVA case states clearly that a general letter asking for more evidence yet which is not specific to the claim is "unacceptable."
The VA could have told me to get an IMO-I did anyhow-
but I realise now that they were not in compliance with the VCAA at all.
This might help someone:
from: http://www.va.gov/vetapp06/files1/0600098.txt
a widow's remand but nevertheless the VCAA is for all claimants-
" The claims file does not contain notice to the appellant clearly specifying the evidence needed to substantiate her claim for service connection of the veteran's death or notice to her clearly delineating
whose specific responsibility -her's or VA's--it is for obtaining this supporting evidence. "QuartuccioV. Principi
Also this decision states:
"VCAA notice should be provided to a claimant before the initial unfavorable RO decision on a claim."
Pelegrini V Principi
It is certainly occuring to me that without proper receipt of a VCAA Notification, the veteran might be screwed right from the git go-
We here all have a very good handle on what the VA needs to succeed in a claim.
Whether we get VCAA letters or not- if the evidence can be obtained, the claim can succeed.
I am really wondering how many vets out there -without this notice specific to their claim-
have a clue as to what they need to provide.
I helped my local vet rep with a vet's claim and suggested an IMO right away because the vet has a Medicare doctor and maybe there would be no IMO fee-
the vet is terminally ill.
The vet rep said he never even thought of that. ???
Say what?
Now I realise that this vet probably never even got a VCAA letter.
These letters-if they prepared well can give a vet numerous ideas as to how to support their claim.
DTA and VCAA only applies to claims for service connection and not to CUEs.
It seems to me that the lack of sufficient VCAA Notice can be a good ploy to use when preparing
any response to any type of denial-if you did not get a proper VCAA letter.
The notice requirtes the VA to be specific to one's claim and therefore they actually have to read the claim to prepare it.
However, a claim with no potential of substantiation will not benefit whether they got a VCAA or not-
what I mean is- say the VA in a DIC decision determines that the veteran (whose widow claimed death due to Agent Orange from Vietnam and that he had two PH's from combat ) never served in Vietnam , no PH's ,and the death certificate revealed a condition causing death totally unrelated to AO presumptive conditions- This is an actual claim I got from a widow-
there is no reason to expect -if no VCAA letter went out to her- that prejudicial error occured because the claim was totally unsubstantiated by information on the veteran's DD 214 itself.
GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !
When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief
Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was
simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."
Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.
Top Posters For This Question
1
Popular Days
Jul 16
1
Jul 17
1
Top Posters For This Question
Berta 1 post
Popular Days
Jul 16 2006
1 post
Jul 17 2006
1 post
1 answer to this question
Recommended Posts