Jump to content
  • Donation Box

    Please donate to support the community.
    We appreciate all donations!
  • Advertisemnt

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims


    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   


  • Advertisemnt

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

Sponsored Ads

  •  ad-free-subscription-002.jpeg     fund-the-site.jpg

  • Searches Community Forums, Blog and more

Sign in to follow this  

Driving The Wedge Or Are You "tha Least Deserving Vet"?

Recommended Posts

''From VA Watchdog page"

The Grinch who stole veterans' benefits is back. Sen. Larry Craig (R-ID), Chairman of the Senate Committee on Veterans' Affairs, has long sought enrollment fees and higher co-pays for veterans.

Tuesday (July 18) before a Senate Subcommittee working on the 2007 appropriations bill for military and VA construction, Craig called veterans who earn $27,000 or more and have no service-connected disabilities "least deserving." ==========" (Reminds me of Rumsfeld's statement about Veterans who had been drafted: "the defense secretary's comment two weeks ago in response to a question about legislation calling for reinstituting the draft. In his remarks, Rumsfeld said he opposed the proposal, adding that draftees added "no value, no advantage, really, to the United States armed services over any sustained period of time."JJ)==========

Other Senators did not feel the same and blocked any increase in VA fees, and also blocked an increase in TRICARE co-pays.

Monies were diverted from military construction to accomplish this.

Craig is also holding hostage funding for VA construction.

So, all of those VA announcements about new clinics and hospital improvements mean absolutely nothing unless Craig gets some funding in the pipeline.


Senate eyes construction funds to avoid drug co-pay hikes

By Rick Maze

Times staff writer

A Senate subcommittee voted Tuesday to divert $795 million from military construction to prevent drug co-payments from increasing and enrollment fees from being charged to modest-income veterans seeking medical treatment who don’t have service-connected disabilities.

The $95 billion 2007 appropriations bill for military construction, the Department of Veterans Affairs and related agencies drew opposition from Sen. Larry Craig, R-Idaho, the Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committee chairman, who said the enrollment fees and higher drug pays proposed by the Bush administration were aimed at the two lowest priorities for veterans eligible for medical care — those with incomes of $27,000 or more who do not have service-connected disabilities. Craig called these the least deserving” veterans.

All that was being requested, he said, was a small enrollment fee, about $250, and increasing the co-payment for prescription drugs to $15.

Craig has been one of the few members of Congress to support the fee increases. Fees make good fiscal sense, he said, but are being rejected “for political reasons.”

‘I really do find it important as chairman of the authorizing committee to plant my feet firmly and say no,” he said.

However, Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison, R-Texas, chairman of the military construction and veterans affairs and related agencies subcommittee that passed the funding bill said she doesn’t think the Bush administration plan is reasonable. “I would never support a fee for someone making $27,000, not ever,” she said.

Hutchison called this a “back-door fee scheme” because the Bush administration cut the veterans’ health care budget on the assumption the fee increases would be approved, forcing Congress to either go along or find money to avoid the cuts. The bill will include language preventing the VA from doing the same thing again, she said.

If the Bush administration proposed applying the higher fees to someone making $100,000 or $150,000 in annual income, Hutchison said she might be willing to discuss it but “I think it is outrageous for us to ask” someone making $27,000 “to pay more.”The $795 million in diverted money comes from the account to cover costs related to base closing and realignment. Hutchison said the money was for supplies, not for construction, although Craig said any cut in the construction budget is unfair.

“We have got military members operating in condemned facilities, and we are going to allow that to continue,” he said.

The diverted money isn’t the only dispute. Craig, who also serves on the appropriations subcommittee, is in a turf war over approval of hospital construction. He agreed to include money in the funding bill for a new veterans’ hospital in New Orleans to replace the one severely damaged last year by Hurricane Katrina, but opposed other hospital projects because the Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committee has not provided authorization.

That leaves other projects in limbo, but Craig said he is still trying to make sense out of the complicated mess of projects authorized but not funded, funded but not authorized and those fully authorized and fully funded but unbuilt because the VA has not released the money. Craig said he was “more frustrated than I have been in years for conflicts at hand and the inability to solve them.”

The bill includes $16.3 billion for construction, including about $4 billion for family housing that is equally split between new construction and operating expenses for existing housing. There is $5.4 billion for construction of active-duty projects, including $2 billion for the Army, $1.2 billion each for the Navy and Air Force and $1 billion for defense agencies. There is $1 billion for reserve components, about $215 million more than the Bush administration request.


Edited by jessejames

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites


This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

  • Ads

  • Ad

  • Latest News
  • Our picks

    • I filed for my mitral valve regurgitation heart disease secondary to a service-connected condition on 7-30-18. It was granted on 8-30-18. Since I filed for this heart valve issue and was awarded, can I still file for hypertension ? I have been seeing comments that you should file for hypertension first and file for heart disease as a secondary. Can I file for hypertension as a secondary to my heart disease ? I am alittle confused on this matter.

    • How to Change the Theme - Look and Colors
      How to Change the Theme - Look and Colors
      • 5 replies
    • For Calculating Retro

      VA Disability Compensation Rates 2012 | 2011 | 2010-2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999

      Prior to 1999 check here https://www.hadit.com/va-disability-compensation-rates-historic-for-retro-calculation/
      • 0 replies
    • I am a 100% disabled veteran, At first I was super excited to find out I am getting retro pay for back benefits to 2006. But that was over 2 months ago. I been waiting and waiting and calling to ask them wheres my back pay. They first told me "one month" than I call again. The guy started reading a script of basically "we are malingering on paying you" type crap. I was wondering if there is any number I can call besides that 800-827-1000 number to inquire about my status. I don't know why its taken so long when there is specific information telling them from the judge that VA owes. 

      There was a remanded to see if I was eligible for IU (I get it now since 2014 im actually 90% with 10 of that been IU). I been on SS since 2004. Can Someone help me out? Thank you
      • 6 replies
    • You might have a 38 CFR 3.156 situation-

      meaning the VA might have considered your claim in 95/96 as "not well grounded" and failed to even get your STRs.Or they did get your STRs but never considered the specific entry you cited here.

      Lots of discussion under a search, of 38 CFR. 3.156 (a)(b) (c) ---here is a winner:



        • Thanks

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines