Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules
- 0
Ftca ,sec 1151 Offset
Rate this question
-
Tell a friend
-
Recent Achievements
-
Our picks
-
2025 VA Disability Compensation Rates an Pay Dates
Tbird posted a question in VA Disability Claims Research,
From CCK-Law.com
VA Disability Payment Schedule for 2025
VA Disability Rates 2025-
- 2 replies
Picked By
Tbird, -
-
VA Disability Claims: 5 Game-Changing Precedential Decisions You Need to Know
Tbird posted a record in VA Claims and Benefits Information,
These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.
Service Connection
Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected.
Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.
Effective Dates
Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.
Rating Issues
Continue Reading on HadIt.com-
- 1 review
Picked By
Tbird, -
-
Are all military medical records on file at the VA?
RichardZ posted a topic in How to's on filing a Claim,
I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful. We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did. He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims. He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file. It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to 1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015. It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me. He didn't want my copies. Anyone have any information on this. Much thanks in advance.-
- 4 replies
Picked By
RichardZ, -
-
Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
Tbird posted a record in VA Claims and Benefits Information,
Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL
This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:
Current Diagnosis. (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)
In-Service Event or Aggravation.
Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”-
- 0 reviews
Picked By
Tbird, -
-
Post in ICD Codes and SCT CODES?WHAT THEY MEAN?
Timothy cawthorn posted an answer to a question,
Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability ratingPicked By
yellowrose, -
-
Question
Berta
I recently had to explain the offset provisions of Section 1151 and FTCA to a local veteran-
and maybe this BVA case that I used for him will help any one here similiarly situated:
http://www.va.gov/vetapp01/files01/0101466.txt
"FINDINGS OF FACT
1. In May 1996, the veteran was granted compensation under
38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 for interdigital nerve neuropathy between
the third and fourth fingers, right hand, as residuals of
January 1995 surgery at a VA facility.
2. In May 1998, a settlement was negotiated in a claim under
the Federal Tort Claims Act and monetary damages totally
$70,000 were awarded to the veteran.
3. Effective retroactively to June 1, 1998, the veteran's
compensation benefits were reduced as a result of an offset
of $70,000 against the FTCA settlement award. "
(This is NOT a direct SC injury-solely a 1151 one- but a good example of why I said in past posts that a veteran, with a Section 1151 claim,should weigh the potential of succeeding in an FTCA- yet incurring an offset.)
Lump sum FTCA awards, if invested well, can help overcome any lack of Sec 1151 compensation lost by the offset.
Also- an offset amount can be determined by General Counsel.
If the claimant asks that to be specified by counsel-and it is agreed to in the settlement then that is the offset-it cannot change.
I cued an offset wrongful death FTCA matter years ago and lost the CUE at the BVA, BUT years later VA counsel cued the VARO on the same thing-
I was right all along-and had even sent them the settlement papers but in those days I actually believed some of the stuff VA said.
My point is that VA Counsel in DC can determine the offset amount, as less then the full settlement amount. They might not want to but try to negotiate this with them.
"The facts show that the FTCA settlement was distributed to
the veteran in his individual capacity. As such, the Board
finds the compensation benefits awarded to the veteran under
38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 are subject to the offset in the amount of
$70,000 against his FTCA settlement award"
GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !
When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief
Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was
simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."
Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.
Top Posters For This Question
1
1
Popular Days
Jul 22
2
Top Posters For This Question
Pete53 1 post
Berta 1 post
Popular Days
Jul 22 2006
2 posts
1 answer to this question
Recommended Posts