Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Tdiu

Rate this question


UsmcSGTVet

Question

This is my first time posting on this sight so if I'm doing it wrong just let me know.

I am in need of a little insight and guidence. My claim for TDIU was submitted in on October 6, 2010 to the Pittsburgh RO. (16-1/2 months and counting) As of September 23, 2011 it has been with the rating activity. At my Comp exam for TDIU the doctor stated that my PTSD, Shoulder dislocations, and Buldging disks are "At least as likely as not render him unable to secure and maintain gainful employment." Has anyone had similar wording or anything they can tell me about the outcome of such wording? Also is almost 17 months normal for TDIU claims in Pittsburgh?

PTSD- 50%

Right shoulder dislocations- 20%

L4-L5, L5-S1 - Buldging disks- 10%

Neurologic involvement lefter lower extremity- 10%

Hiatel hernia- 10%

70% Total

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 18
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

​I'm not familiar with the "the blue sheet". What exactly does this consist of?

Coot

!!!BROKEN ARROW!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

​I'm not familiar with the "the blue sheet". What exactly does this consist of?

Coot

To my knowledge it is or was an internal VA codesheet.

Somehow someone didn't notice and sent me copies.

M21-1MR, Part III, Subpart iv, Chapter 7, Section A

Topic

Topic Name

See Page

1

Printing and Distributing the Rating Decision

7-A-2

2

Providing Copies of the Rating Decision

7-A-4

b. Printing the Rating Decision

Print the rating decision as listed below.

  • Print the signed file copy of rating decisions on blue paper, except as specifically provided for overprint rating decisions.
  • Print the decision on both sides of the paper, called duplex printing, provided that the reverse side is printed head to foot, that is, the short edge as opposed to the long edge.

Note: Copies of rating decisions do not have to be on blue paper.

e. Distributing the Narrative Portion of the Rating Decision

Copy and send the narrative portion of the rating decision to the claimant with notification of the decision.

f. Distributing the Codesheet

The codesheet of the rating decision is intended for internal processing and not routinely distributed to the claimant.

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's funny! Did it state anything other than what was written on your decision letter?..Like something between the raters and not for your eyes to see..lol

Coot

!!!BROKEN ARROW!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's funny! Did it state anything other than what was written on your decision letter?..Like something between the raters and not for your eyes to see..lol

Coot

Well, not necessarily just between "the raters" but anyone that had access to either OR BOTH my c-file

and my VAMC file.

Some of the parts of my c-file they DID NOT want to provide me copies of were

a decision makers request for an additional C&P that stated the veteran appears to have

some psychogenic components in relation to her continuous claims for physical injuries.

(((psychogenic

[sī′kōjen′ik]

Etymology: Gk, psyche + genein, to produce

1 originating within the mind.

2 referring to any physical symptom, disease process, or emotional state that is of psychologic rather than physical origin. Also called psychogenetic. See also psychosomatic.))))

Another thing they DID NOT want to provide a copy of was a form completed by a decision maker that stated

It is of record that the veteran has stalked in waiting, a VAMC ENT MD, with a loaded weapon, on VAMC Federal Property.

This was during a time when I filed a FTC against the Feds for this same ENT azz physically, sexually assaulting me

at the VAMC and several and local newspaper articles had been published with the ENT calling me a liar -

this was settled through Court Ordered Mediation, with an undisclosed sum paid to me - the jerk loosing his medical

license and any further employment in any capacity with the VA.

For some reason the VAMC maintained a full copy of the FTC and mediation agreement through the Court

in my VAMC medical file. Another huge fiasco to get this removed

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Update:

Recieved this IRIS April 25, 2012:

Thank you for your inquiry to the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) dated April 5, 2012. The information you have requested is not available through our electronic system, as the Congressman’s correspondence is Special Controlled Correspondence. We do not know what the Congressman requested. We do show, however, that your claim, received on October 6, 2010 is currently awaiting a decision by our rating activity. A rating specialist will review it to make sure we have everything we need. If we determine additional information is needed, we will contact you. If we have everything we need, we will prepare a decision on your claim.

The Decision Phase is completed on most claims onaverage in 70 days. Your claim’s Decision Phase began April 24, 2012. The length of time it takes to complete the Decision Phase depends on several factors, such as the type of claim filed, the number of disabilities you claimed, and VA’s pending workload. A claim may take longer in this phase based on the specifics of your claim.

Your claim file was sent to St Louis Regional Office for completion. Thank you for contacting us. If you have questions or need additional help with the information in our reply, please respond to this message or see our other contact information below.

Sincerely yours,

Donovan W. Thompson

National IRIS Response Center Manager

ogm

Does anyone one have any input on this change of events?

How is the St. Louis RO on getting claims through in a timely matter?

Does sending my claim from Pittsburgh RO to St. Louis mean bad things or are they actually trying to decide this claim?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Update:

Recieved this IRIS April 25, 2012:

Thank you for your inquiry to the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) dated April 5, 2012. The information you have requested is not available through our electronic system, as the Congressman’s correspondence is Special Controlled Correspondence. We do not know what the Congressman requested. We do show, however, that your claim, received on October 6, 2010 is currently awaiting a decision by our rating activity. A rating specialist will review it to make sure we have everything we need. If we determine additional information is needed, we will contact you. If we have everything we need, we will prepare a decision on your claim.

The Decision Phase is completed on most claims onaverage in 70 days. Your claim’s Decision Phase began April 24, 2012. The length of time it takes to complete the Decision Phase depends on several factors, such as the type of claim filed, the number of disabilities you claimed, and VA’s pending workload. A claim may take longer in this phase based on the specifics of your claim.

Your claim file was sent to St Louis Regional Office for completion. Thank you for contacting us. If you have questions or need additional help with the information in our reply, please respond to this message or see our other contact information below.

Sincerely yours,

Donovan W. Thompson

National IRIS Response Center Manager

ogm

Does anyone one have any input on this change of events?

How is the St. Louis RO on getting claims through in a timely matter?

Does sending my claim from Pittsburgh RO to St. Louis mean bad things or are they actually trying to decide this claim?

my claims are usally rated by the st petersburg varo but had one rated in jackson, missippi last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use