below is what i think is a true injustic this claim is back at the court again after being denied using this as evidence against my claim, i keep asking my self (can they do this) from what i know and read about lay evidence, this is just wrong,the medical opinions never considered the lay evidence either. what do you think ? The mere contentions of the Veteran, no matter how well-meaning, without supporting medical evidence that would etiologically relate his current complaints with a