Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • Donate Now and Keep Us Helping You

     

  • 0

Going In To The Hospital For Ep Study

Rate this question


Question

Posted

I am scheduled to go into the hospital on Oct 19. I will be having an EP study on my heart arrhythmias and Tachycardia. Depending on what they find they will either do an ablation or an (AICD) Automatic Implantable Cardioverter Defrillator. If they cure my tachycardia with the ablation then that would be great and I will be very happy. If the ablation doesn't work then they will implant the AICD. I am currently SC at 0% for (SVT) Supraventicular Tachycardia and (PAT) Paroxysmal Atrial Tachycardia. The cardiologist thinks I may either have the SVT or (VT) Ventricular Tachycardia. The EP study will determine what exactly I have and the necessary treatment.

One thing that the cardiologist mentioned to me was that whatever condition I have that it "may" be a congenital condition that I have had since birth. The question I have is, what will this mean with the VA as far as my SC claim is concerned? Could this be a certain denial because they will say I was born with this heart condition, therefore I am not eligible for disability? I have been SC for this PSVT for approx. 45 years. My current claim is in the appeal process and is going nowhere fast.

Any help or advice would be appreciated.

Brian

I've waited this long and I'm not giving up....NEVER!!

  • Answers 9
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Posted

Sorry, it should say "defibrillator"

I've waited this long and I'm not giving up....NEVER!!

  • HadIt.com Elder
Posted

When were you first DX'ed with these problems?

Posted

When were you first DX'ed with these problems?

I was diagnosed with PAT while I was in the Navy. That was back in 1966 and they discharged me and gave me 10% for 1 year and then took it away from me. I am trying to get my 10% reinstated.

I've waited this long and I'm not giving up....NEVER!!

Posted

One thing that the cardiologist mentioned to me was that whatever condition I have that it "may" be a congenital condition that I have had since birth. So?

The question I have is, what will this mean with the VA as far as my SC claim is concerned? Nothing.

Could this be a certain denial because they will say I was born with this heart condition, therefore I am not eligible for disability? No. The condition was diagnosed while you were in service. You (apparently) are service connected for SVT and PAT.

There are several threads somewhere on these forums which discuss whether a congenital or inherited (familial) conditions can be service connected or not; the answer is yes. Whether a condition is familial/hereditary/congenital is not an absolute bar to service connection.

Furthermore, whether the condition was granted in error or not, you have been service connected for <far> more than 10 years, so the issue of service connection itself is protected. Unless of course, there was fraud involved in obtaining service connection some 40+ years ago.

My current claim is in the appeal process and is going nowhere fast. Appealed what? If related to PSVT or PAT, what were the reasons given that made you dissatisfied?

Do your symptoms include: " Permanent atrial fibrillation (lone atrial fibrillation), or; one to four episodes per year of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation or other supraventricular tachycardia documented by ECG or Holter monitor", which is required for a 10% evaluation?

I am scheduled to go into the hospital on Oct 19. I will be having an EP study on my heart arrhythmias and Tachycardia. Depending on what they find they will either do an ablation or an (AICD) Automatic Implantable Cardioverter Defrillator. If they cure my tachycardia with the ablation then that would be great and I will be very happy. If the ablation doesn't work then they will implant the AICD. I am currently SC at 0% for (SVT) Supraventicular Tachycardia and (PAT) Paroxysmal Atrial Tachycardia. The cardiologist thinks I may either have the SVT or (VT) Ventricular Tachycardia. The EP study will determine what exactly I have and the necessary treatment.

One thing that the cardiologist mentioned to me was that whatever condition I have that it "may" be a congenital condition that I have had since birth. The question I have is, what will this mean with the VA as far as my SC claim is concerned? Could this be a certain denial because they will say I was born with this heart condition, therefore I am not eligible for disability? I have been SC for this PSVT for approx. 45 years. My current claim is in the appeal process and is going nowhere fast.

Any help or advice would be appreciated.

Brian

Posted

Yes, I am SC for PAT which has been changed to Supraventicular Arrhythmias.

And yes, I have been SC for approx 46 years.

There was no fraud involved when I was diagnosed and service connected.

The reason I am disatisfied is because the VA assigned a 10% rating back in 1966 and then took it away from me after 1 year. The C&P rater said I didn't have the PAT anymore and I was fine now. Well, I still have it and its getting worse over the years. I believe a 10% rating is required mainly because of the need for "continuous medication". The VA cardiologist prescribed medication for my PAT in 2008 and it helped a little bit. Now my private cardiologist is sending me for a EP study to see what they can do to help me.

My claim was denied 3 times by the RO in Oakland over the past 6 years and was then sent to the BVA. The BVA remanded it back to the RO 1 year ago. I am waiting for a new C&P.

I've waited this long and I'm not giving up....NEVER!!

  • HadIt.com Elder
Posted

I agree with others that they should buno your rating.

Good luck on your EP study.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • AFguy1999 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Grey Goose earned a badge
      First Post
    • Matrev earned a badge
      First Post
    • Patrol Agent earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Patrol Agent earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • From CCK-Law.com

      VA Disability Payment Schedule for 2025

      VA Disability Rates 2025
      • 2 replies
    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 1 review
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 reviews
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use