Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • Donate Now and Keep Us Helping You

     

  • 0

Claim Not Certified But Ebenefits Shows Bva Decision

Rate this question


Question

Posted

In January 2010 I submitted a substantive appeal VA form 9. March 2010 the claim was listed as certified to BVA. In February 2012 the claim was no longer certified to BVA and I was told that it was being reviewed by DRO at VA Regional Office (maybe because of the new evidence that was discovered by someone). Scheduled for a C&P in April 2012. On 18 Oct 2012, Ebenefits shows that the BVA (not the DRO at the VA Regional office) has made a decison on my claim and has sent it to the VA Health Center (not the VA Regional office).

Question 1: How did the BVA make a decsion if I was never notified that they (BVA) received my VA form 9 for review?

Question 2: If somehow the VA Regional Office DRO is using this term and has again denied my claim and is sending me a supplemental statement of the case, will I have to submit another VA form 9 and get back in line? And if so, what happens to my January 2010 Subsstantive appeal.

About six months ago, I personally telephoned the BVA to ask when a docket number was assigned to an appeal and the BVA specifically told me, that the docket number is assigned upon the appeal (VA form 9) being received and logged at the BVA.

If an SSOC has in fact been issued then I am in for an additional 2 to 3 years wait (very unfortunate if that is the case!!!).

  • Answers 8
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Posted

In January 2010 I submitted a substantive appeal VA form 9.

March 2010 the claim was listed as certified to BVA.

For starters - I do not see any way the above could remotely

be correct.

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

  • Lead Moderator
Posted

Add

Something similar happened to a Vets advocate friend of mine. His claim went to the BVA nothing, nothing, nothing.

During the long wait, he had recieved an unrelated RO decision which he also appealed.

Years go by. One BVA decision is decided and no decision is sent out. This is because they decided to merge it with the "new appeal" thus further delaying the first decision.

Mine was even worse. The BVA had merged 4 decisions with one appeal. Two of these were never adjuticated at all because the BVA decided they "became moot" when benefits were awarded...this all without due process for me. In other words, they were "deemed denials" that the VA loves.

A deemed denial is the ultimate slap in the face to Vets. What it says is "The VA does not have to decide your claim..we are delaying this forever, and it is up to the Veteran and his advocate to figure out that it was denied. If the Vet can not figure that out, we are banning benefits for him unless he can come up with "new and material evidence". Of course, the VA can ignore that, too.

  • Lead Moderator
Posted

Also, its a mistake to think that ebenefits is accurate. Ebenefits is a politically made up farce that the current administration touts as how he helped Vets. Ebenefits does not help Vets...it is so inaccurate and unreliable as to be unusable. It is updated only when and if the RO decides it should be updated, and often that is not very often. It is also "down" a very high percentage of the time. Hadit, manned by volunteers, is a far more reliable website than ebenefits which cost millions of dollars.

Posted

Each Veterans eBenefits information is influenced by your reagional office to some extent, since they do certain data entry and are responsible for keypunching information about you claim/appeal into the system.

That said, with Detroit VARO, every single appeal I have lists the status as pending BVA decision(3). However, none of these claims have been certified or sent. I have one that is in active DRO review, and until they send me a SOC and I have to file that last form 9 none of them are even close to going to BVA.

I had one DRO review that was a favorable response so I did not file the from 9. When the deadline passed I received an eBenefits entry that indicated that the BVA made a decision on my claim.

I suspect that ADD55P's file has been at the VARO all along and it hasn't been sent to BVA. Did you ever receive a docket number from BVA? That "decision" was that the claim had become final since I had not filled a form 9, for that particular claim.

Sounds like the decision that was reached was that the April 2012 C&P was deficient and needed some questions answered. At least they did this relatively soon for you. I have a DRO C&P in June 2011 and they Decided in July 2012 that it was deficient and needed additional information.

Posted

First let me say that I do not feel bad or stressed out, Just concerned!

My updated situation is as follows:

VA form 9 submitted and claim was subsequently certified to BVA(but remained at VARO). After making VA aware of serious errors that they made, VA pulled the claim from being certified to BVA (still at VARO) and adjudicated the substantive appeal at VARO. VA closed the BVA appeal and awarded (SLAP IN THE FACE) extremely lowball rating. Substantive appeal never reached BVA and is now listed in the Historical Appeal Section.

VA states that another NOD for the new decision must be submitted to start the appeal process over agian. All of the evidence to support a very much higher rating was not mentioned. I was very optimistic when they pulled my substantive appeal out of the BVA stack to adjudicate it at the VARO, but was very disapointed at the results. It appears that my due process (perfected substantive appeal) was simply taken away to save VA embarassment at BVA (the error that VA made was that bad and would have been noticed right away by a BVA Law Judge).

I was under the impression that a Substantive appeal would remain open until it was reviewed by BVA.

The VARO made it appear on Ebenefits that the Decison and claims decision was disptched from a BVA Veterans law judge, but after speaking with a BVA representative, I was informed that my claim was never certified to BVA and decidied at the regional office.

What does any one recommend as a course of action for a situation such as this. Before you ask if I have a VSO, the answer is yes. No answer from the VSO to my inquiry as of yet. I am beginning to get the feeling that I have nothing to lose by informing the VAOIG and sending the subcommittee on veterans affairs a letter explaining how I feel that my claim was not properly adjudicated. VA cannot do anything worse to me than what they have already done.

Thanks in advance and Happy Thanksgiving!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

  • Our picks

    • From CCK-Law.com

      VA Disability Payment Schedule for 2025

      VA Disability Rates 2025
      • 2 replies
    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 1 review
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 reviews
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use