Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • Donate Now and Keep Us Helping You

     

  • 0

C&p Dr. Rec. Hysterectomy

Rate this question


Question

Posted (edited)

Went for my C&P on my deferred claim of Uterus prolapse, cyctocele, rectocele, and incontinence. The Dr. said she was recommending a hysterectomy. Not sure what that means, or if she even saw the cyctocele or rectocele because she didn't put the speculum in sideways. (Placed in normally and openined up would support the top and bottom of the pelvic wall, when placed sideways and opened it will reveal prolapse.) Anyway, she said it's not going to get better until the VA does a hysterectomy. I am 32, but I really can't keep living my life with the pain, and embrarassment this defect causes. Any advice or crystal ball predictions for the outcome of this C&P? BTW, I saw this same Dr. in my initial C&P in April 2011. She did the exact same exam then, but these issues were deferred for further development.

Edited by AFMedic09

1 John 4:9

  • Answers 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

Posted

Rating criteria for cystocele/rectocele are at Diagnostic Code (DC) 7623 at 38 CFR 4.116 http://www.benefits....ART4/S4_116.DOC . Rating criteria for uterine prolapse are at DC 7624 (see the earlier link) . The C&P examiner's recommendation is just that, a recommendation, and is not ratable until the event occurs. .

If a hysterectomy is indicated because of the prolapse, it would be service connected. Rating criteria for a hysterectomy are at DC 7618. SMC-k is an issue. If the hysterectomy is done, I'd suspect that any rating under DC 7624 would be reduced.

If the ovaries are removed as well, there has to be evidence that the ovaries were diseased (and service connectable) and the oopherectomies were not for the convenience of the patient. If service connection for hysterectomy with oopherectomy is indicated, the DC is 7617. SMC-k is an issue.

The traditional repair for a cystocele/rectocele is the Anterior and Posterior colporraphy, or A&P Repair. If the A&P is done, I'd suspect that any rating under DC 7623 would be reduced.

On a rant ... some ladies want the oophers taken out while one is mucking around inside, even though there is no ovarian pathology, "just in case" to prevent a future operation for ovarian CA. After this surgical castration, there is hormone replacement therapy (HRT). While HRT has gotten way better through the years, it does not provide all the same hormones, or in the correct amounts for you, or at the right time for you. At age 32, if you have no ovarian pathology and do not have a family history of ovarian CA, you might want to consider keeping the oophers. Of course, you need to discuss this with your GYN.

Went for my C&P on my deferred claim of Uterus prolapse, cyctocele, rectocele, and incontinence. The Dr. said she was recommending a hysterectomy. Not sure what that means, or if she even saw the cyctocele or rectocele because she didn't put the speculum in sideways. (Placed in normally and openined up would support the top and bottom of the pelvic wall, when placed sideways and opened it will reveal prolapse.) Anyway, she said it's not going to get better until the VA does a hysterectomy. I am 32, but I really can't keep living my life with the pain, and embrarassment this defect causes. Any advice or crystal ball predictions for the outcome of this C&P? BTW, I saw this same Dr. in my initial C&P in April 2011. She did the exact same exam then, but these issues were deferred for further development.

Posted

Thank you for your VERY informative post. I would not opt. to have my ovaries removed. I do not have any issues with them aside from the occasional cyst. I am rated for a TVT I had done while on active duty which lifted my bladder. However, that procedure had its own complications, and is no longer effective. Being that I am only 32, and while I do not plan to have any more children, would your recommendation be to hold off on the hysterectomy? The doctors have always said that would be the ultimate result of my issues, but the time was never discussed. Now the C&P Dr. told me that I need to have this done or else my issues will not be resolved. I am a scared to have this procedure done at 32...but at the same time living with having to wear pads and never knowing when I won't be able to control it is something I would like to move on from. Thank you again for your response.

1 John 4:9

Posted

Being that I am only 32, and while I do not plan to have any more children, would your recommendation be to hold off on the hysterectomy? Generally speaking, I am a big fan of holding on to one's body parts until they have to go ... but that's just me. I know of several women who swore they would never have a child, or would never have another child ... but in their mid-40s aggressively sought a a pregnancy with hormonal shots, IVF, etc., as well as voodoo. Generally speaking, this was associated with a new marriage.

Reversing a tubal ligation/clipping is not unknown, but a hysterectomy is kinda permanent. While I have read of some recently performed uterus transplants, it is not known whether the transplants will take in the long run, whether ovule implantation is possible, whether one could carry the fetus to term.

​ With any surgery, there are attendant dangers. There may be some psychological issues as well, ie., "i am no longer capable of conceiving, so what further use am I?"

So, I am reluctant to advise you either way.

The doctors have always said that would be the ultimate result of my issues, but the time was never discussed. Now the C&P Dr. told me that I need to have this done or else my issues will not be resolved. It was probably somewhat inappropriate for the C&P examiner to make that comment, as they strictly are supposed to evaluate a current condition and not enter into any therapeutic relationship. If any recommendations are to be made, it should be that you need to see you personal physician/PCP.

I am a scared to have this procedure done at 32... That's not an inappropriate feeling.

but at the same time living with having to wear pads and never knowing when I won't be able to control it is something I would like to move on from. It is difficult to recommend what you should do without knowing a lot more, which I should not and do want to do. However, the A&P repair (particularly the 'A' side, might go a long way in solving some incontinence problems. After an A&P, I'd recommend Kegel exercises. But, you really need to speak with your GYN or your urologist about the chances for success (I say GYN as well as a urologist because there is a long-term turf war between the two specialties WRT incontinence treatments).

Thank you again for your response. No problem.

Thank you for your VERY informative post. I would not opt. to have my ovaries removed. I do not have any issues with them aside from the occasional cyst. I am rated for a TVT I had done while on active duty which lifted my bladder. However, that procedure had its own complications, and is no longer effective. Being that I am only 32, and while I do not plan to have any more children, would your recommendation be to hold off on the hysterectomy? The doctors have always said that would be the ultimate result of my issues, but the time was never discussed. Now the C&P Dr. told me that I need to have this done or else my issues will not be resolved. I am a scared to have this procedure done at 32...but at the same time living with having to wear pads and never knowing when I won't be able to control it is something I would like to move on from. Thank you again for your response.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

  • Our picks

    • From CCK-Law.com

      VA Disability Payment Schedule for 2025

      VA Disability Rates 2025
      • 2 replies
    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 1 review
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 reviews
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use