-
-
Get Your HadIt.com Merch! Check them out here
-
Who's Online 0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 13 Guests (See full list)
- There are no registered users currently online
Get Your HadIt.com Merch! Check them out here
{terms] and Guidelines
Question
broncovet
The CAVC case, Jones vs Shinseki, is instructive.
http://www.veteranslawlibrary.com/files/CAVC_cases/2012/Jones_11-2704.pdf
This Veteran complained that the Board did not rate him strictly by the criteria. The CAVC stated it plainly:
As this Court has made clear, "[t]he Board's consideration of factors which arewhollyoutside
the rating criteria provided by the regulations is error as a matter of law."
This comes very close to saying that, when the VA rates the Veteran OTHER than by the specified criteria, it is CUE.
In this case, the Veteran won a remand, because the VA considered the effects of the meds he was on, when the rating criteria did not specify whether the Veteran should be rated on symptoms with OR without medication.
If you have been recently denied, then you might look over the rating criteria, and then re read your decision to see if the VA used non criteria.
I know for a fact the VA does just that. They denied my hearing loss ten years ago because it had been a long time since I was in service. The length of time since service is not one of the criteria for rating hearing impairments.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
1
Popular Days
Nov 7
1
Top Posters For This Question
broncovet 1 post
Popular Days
Nov 7 2012
1 post
0 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.