Jump to content

Sponsored Ads



  • Latest Donations

  • Advertisemnt

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims

    questions-001@3x.png

    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
     
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   

    tinnitus-005.pngptsd-005.pnglumbosacral-005.pngscars-005.pnglimitation-flexion-knee-005.pngdiabetes-005.pnglimitation-motion-ankle-005.pngparalysis-005.pngdegenerative-arthitis-spine-005.pngtbi-traumatic-brain-injury-005.png

  • Advertisemnt

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

Sponsored Ads

  • Searches Community Forums, Blog and more

  • Donation Box

    Please donate to support the community.
    We appreciate all donations!
  • 0
Sign in to follow this  
justrluk

Would This Be A Cue?

Question

If I've had this answered before, please forgive me. If my STRs are missing and the VA made a decision based on their assumption that a condition was pre-existing when it was not (they mention in the decision the lack of STRs) that would have changed the rating at the time, would this be a CUE?

EDIT: I may have answered my own question. After scouring the BVA site, it appears as though most cases are remanded to the RO to have them look (again) for the missing records (mine has done this and stated so in the SOC). I love this part:

"Regrettably, the Board must remand the claims...."

If the continued search for the records would be considered futile, they request another exam (why, I have no idea - if the condition did not pre-exist service) and re-evaluate the claim. Seems like an infinite loop to me...adding years to the process.

What I don't understand: how could an examiner determine if a condition did or did not exist prior to service from 30 years ago? I would think that the RO should see this simple fact - the existence of the initial entry exam - and the proof of service from that date in addition to the admitted lack of STRs as sufficient evidence to prove a CUE was commited.

Lastly, this issue is on appeal (DRO). Can a CUE be claimed on this, or do I have to wait until the appeal is resolved?

Edited by justrluk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

VA cannot commit a CUE, it they do not have the records that a CUE is based on.

However, it amazes me how often 'missing' records can possible turn up.

And I assume they did apparently have some,if not all of your STRs, for your present rating

This is an award for newly discovered service records, that gave the veteran a more favorable EED:

http://www.va.gov/vetapp12/Files2/1212421.txt

If the records are found this is the regulation that can re-open the claim with a possible potential for many years of retro in some cases:

and

“Posted 26 April 2012 - 06:55 AM

We briefly discussed 38 CFR 3.156 on last night's SVR show.”

That show is in the SVR archives here.

But you asked specifically ---

“If my STRs are missing and the VA made a decision based on their assumption that a condition was pre-existing when it was not (they mention in the decision the lack of STRs) that would have changed the rating at the time, would this be a CUE? “

In my opinion, it would be a CUE if the VA failed to demonstrate clear and convincing evidence that the disability pre-existed prior to service.

http://www.va.gov/vetapp12/Files5/1232497.txt

Also please see my next post.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ad

Thanks, Ms. Berta! I'll do that...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry I forgot to post this, if you CUE the decision:

3. Determining Direct and Presumptive Service Connection, Continued

d. Definition: Presumption of Soundness

The presumption of soundness means that Veteran will be considered to have been in sound condition when examined, accepted, and enrolled for service except as to defects, infirmities, or disorders noted at entrance into service.

Notes:


  • The presumption of soundness applies only when the Veteran underwent a physical examination at the time of entry into service on which the claim is based.

  • Only the conditions that are recorded in the examination report are to be considered as noted.



    When no preexisting condition is noted at entrance into service, the burden falls on the VA to rebut the presumption of soundness by clear and unmistakable evidence showing that the disease or injury

    • existed prior to service, and

    • was not aggravated by service.

    Reference: For more information on the presumption of soundness, see

    [*]

    38 U.S.C. 1111

    [*]

    VAOPGCPREC 3-2003, and

    [*]

    Wagner v. Principi, 370 F.3d 1089, 1096 (Fed. Cir. 2004).

    Source : M21-1MR, Part IV, Subpart ii, Chapter 2, Section B

    I suggest to cite 38 USC 1111, and the VA General COunsel Prec 3-2003 (available at their web site_

    and certainly Wagner.

    I am sure Wagner V Principi as been discussed here in the past.

    I have been reading M21-1MR = a miserable boring and time consuming but enlightening task.

    The M21-1MR makes references that can often support a CUE claim.

    I have used print offs from M21 as well as the regs for my CUE claims.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ms. Berta,

Thank you for your valuable info. I noted in blue my particular situation:

Sorry I forgot to post this, if you CUE the decision:

3. Determining Direct and Presumptive Service Connection, Continued

d. Definition: Presumption of Soundness

The presumption of soundness means that Veteran will be considered to have been in sound condition when examined, accepted, and enrolled for service except as to defects, infirmities, or disorders noted at entrance into service.

Notes:


  • The presumption of soundness applies only when the Veteran underwent a physical examination at the time of entry into service on which the claim is based. (I did and provided a document with my NOD to prove it)


  • Only the conditions that are recorded in the examination report are to be considered as noted.


    When no preexisting condition is noted at entrance into service, the burden falls on the VA to rebut the presumption of soundness by clear and unmistakable evidence showing that the disease or injury

    • existed prior to service, and


    • was not aggravated by service. (The condition pre-existed my most recent period of service, but the decision did not include my initial period of service from 8/84 - 10/87. This is the period for which I provided the entrance documents.)

    Reference: For more information on the presumption of soundness, see

    [*]

    38 U.S.C. 1111

    [*]

    VAOPGCPREC 3-2003, and

    [*]

    Wagner v. Principi, 370 F.3d 1089, 1096 (Fed. Cir. 2004).

    Source : M21-1MR, Part IV, Subpart ii, Chapter 2, Section B

    I suggest to cite 38 USC 1111, and the VA General COunsel Prec 3-2003 (available at their web site_

    and certainly Wagner.

    I am sure Wagner V Principi as been discussed here in the past.

    I have been reading M21-1MR = a miserable boring and time consuming but enlightening task.

    The M21-1MR makes references that can often support a CUE claim.

    I have used print offs from M21 as well as the regs for my CUE claims.

    Also, must I wait for the appeal to run its course, or can I file the CUE based on this information before the appeal is finished?

    Thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"Also, must I wait for the appeal to run its course, or can I file the CUE based on this information before the appeal is finished?"

I must have misunderstood this- sorry

A CUE claim can only be filed on a final VA decision.

After reading your reply , I assume your appeal is regarding the exact same matter and the VA did not consider the presumption of soundness regarding your first period of service.

It sounds like your evidence is certainly good enough to get this rectified.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Ads

  • Ad

  • Latest News
  • Our picks

    • OK so I had pancreatectomy in 2003 due to an impacted goldstone 2/3 of my  Pancreas was removed I am type one diabetes with very large scars continued diarrhea stomach problems Constant back and shoulder pain I recently received a Nexus letter from my  endocrinologist related to my service in the gulf war.  Any suggestions or advice from anyone
    • I would like to meet other Hadit members who live in Michigan.  We have at least two major VA Hospitals (Battle Creek, Ann Arbor).  Or maybe you go to the the John Dingell in Detroit.  

      I like Ann Arbor.  I like the fact that most of the doctors there are also at the UM Hospital.  I don't like how uickly they seem to turn over though.  
        • Like
      • 5 replies
    • Really?
      I am confused.  A few days ago I spoke to a person at a VARO who said if I die from something other than service-connected my husband gets zero, zilch, squat.  Hmmmmmm, it seems the rules change willy-nilly...I have been rated 100% P & T for over 10 years, MS is static, and I am 56 years of age.

      Can a fellow Veteran shed a light on this?

      Thank you.
        • Haha
      • 15 replies
    • Fund raising for HadIt.com
      The site is supported through ads and ad free subscriptions, we are also asking for any support you would like to send our way. You can give a $1 or more it all helps. Keep in mind though that it is NOT tax deductible and we are NOT a non profit. As the site grows so do the costs and ads and subscription do not always keep pace with the costs. Any help is appreciated, but not required.
      • 11 replies
    • Carol Ozanecki- Blue Water vet Advocate called me with this news:

      https://www.stripes.com/news/lawmakers-launch-new-effort-to-provide-agent-orange-coverage-for-blue-water-navy-vets-1.525395

      Also there is a article in Pop Culture she sent to me----mentionig Blue Water vets buy I felt it was too political to post here. You can google it if you want to read it.

       

       
      • 10 replies
×

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines