Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • Donate Now and Keep Us Helping You

     

  • 0

Va Proposal To Add Five Tbi Related Illnesses

Rate this question


Question

Posted

VA to Add Five TBI Related Illnesses

Week of December 17, 2012

The Department of Veterans Affairs is publishing a proposed regulation in the Federal Register that would change its rules to add five diagnosable illnesses which are secondary to service-connected Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI). Comments on the proposed rule will be accepted over the next 60 days. A final regulation will be published after consideration of all comments received. The proposed rule and information on how to comment is available on the Federal Register website. Specific information about the Defense and Veteran Brain Injury Center is available at www.dvbic.org. Information about Gulf War and VA's services and programs are available at VA's Gulf War Exposures webpage at www.publichealth.va.gov/exposures/gulfwar/hazardous_exposures.asp.

“A nation reveals itself not only by the men it produces, but also by the men it honors, the men it remembers.” - John F. Kennedy

  • Answers 1
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

1 answer to this question

Recommended Posts

Posted

I just entered my comment -

It won't show on the register just yet.

Thank you for submitting a comment on the following Public Submission:

Comment on AN89-Proposed Rule-Ford, Glenn M.

Agency: VA

Document ID: VA-2012-VBA-0029-0002

When will my comment appear online?

After submitting your comment, you will not be able to view your comment until the appropriate agency reviews and publishes it on Regulations.gov. Given certain regulations may have thousands of comments, processing may take several weeks before it is viewed online. To obtain further information, please follow-up with the agency contact listed in the document soliciting your input. To view this document click the link above.

How do I find my comment in the future?

The best way to find your comment in the future is to enter your Comment Tracking Number in the search field on the homepage. You can also search by keyword or submitter name.

Below is my 20 bucks worth.

"I am glad to see some additional clarifying changes being

proposed in the register to help revamp and upgrade the

CFR criteria for TBI, whether it be mild, moderate or severe.

I was honorably discharged in 1978 and had experienced

three separate head traumas during active duty,all resulted in multiple profiles.

Just prior to ETS I began to experience clonic/tonic seizures.

Shortly after separation I was hospitalized at VAMC expense several times for this.

My driver's license was revoked due this.

A VSO helped me file a claim for seizures and headaches along with a couple of additional issues. My VARO denied the issue of seizures and headaches for several years.

On appeal before a panel of VA and Medical Professionals, my claim issue for seizures was finally granted as service connected, with an effective date of day following separation, headaches remained denied for decades.

In October 2008, the first CFR regs went into effect to specifically address TBI's.

I re-opened the claim issue of headaches, low and behold it was granted under the new and revised DC- 8045 for TBI.

I continue to have health difficulties that impact my daily life,

residuals from the head injuries that happened on active duty.

Hopefully this update to the Federal Register will help empower veterans (that have experienced head traumas

while on active duty), obtain the medical care and benefits

that are SUPPOSED to be provided to them, in a timely manner.Personally, way back then in 1978 - action on the part of the VA claim adjudication process and medical professionals at some VAMC's, was in my opinion intolerable and attacking towards a veteran that was a seizure patient.

I am in great hopes that this is changing and no current or future veterans will be treated poorly or denied benefits.

I fully concur with the prior comment in relation to multiple head injuries, this also must be addressed.

Thank you for providing me an opportunity to comment and your consideration of my opinion."

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • AFguy1999 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Grey Goose earned a badge
      First Post
    • Matrev earned a badge
      First Post
    • Patrol Agent earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Patrol Agent earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • From CCK-Law.com

      VA Disability Payment Schedule for 2025

      VA Disability Rates 2025
      • 2 replies
    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 1 review
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 reviews
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use