Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

New Va Pain Medication Policy

Rate this topic


Recommended Posts

On August 27, 2014 at 8:10 PM, Vync said:

The VA sometimes requires opiate pain medicine contracts to be signed by patients. The plan restricts pain meds to being given by a single VA physician. If you get any type of opiate pain medicine, in any form, from a non VA doc, they cut you off. It's a clear cut violation of the patient's bill of rights and makes you feel like you are a criminal, even if you do not violate the rules.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I'm going to kinda change the subject here but it has to do with pain meds. Pain medications only work for so long before they actually quit working. No matter how much they increase, and the more they increase, the less they will work on you. Remember they only work in the brain at the nerve endings. Most people's best bet is to do what I did, I was first on Oxycodone and then PM switched me over to Morphine SR and MOrphine IR. A week ago I asked my PM doctor to please take me off the MorphineS because they just were not working anymore because the VA has kept me on the lowest dose now for 3 years. See once a year they should increase the dosages but they haven't been doing this. So I asked to go back to Tramadol 100mgs 3 times a day so what he did is keeping me on the Morphine SR and prescribed Tramadol 50mgs 4 times a day. I am doing this to DETOX my body as I feel its toxicity levels are high because of the pain and other meds I take. You have to do this, its a must.

I am a bit time Christian but I do believe in cannabis as a natural pain reliever and whenever they get it squared away here in Florida I am switching over to that. First I will try the Charlotte's strain which has very, very low THC but normal levels of cannabis which is what we need to relieve our pain. If I have to fly to Denver to test it out for a weekend I will just to see if the Charlotte's strain does what they say its doing for people in pain. No smoking it just eat a little bit of it as you get more in digestion than smoking it. I watched a ex-police officer taking this as he has some type of disease that causes pain in his legs. He said it works. I believe the FEDS are in fact hiding the truth from people about cannabis because they have Patent on it for Neurological reasons!!! Think about it, why would they have a Patent on it? Secondly how can a government put a patent on something they didn't create?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I take OPANA and OXYCODONE every day of my life for low back pain...I had to go to a PAIN Managment  clinic: NOT THE VA....I don't trust them

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am VA Pension Housebound Aid & Attendance YET the VA Medical Center is demanding I go to VA for face to face with pain meds PN, his is 100% bullshit I have 8" of plating in my spine 6 back operations and pain 24/7 how can they violate my Housebound status like that?  When my Home Team PN comes to my home isn't that a face to face? The VA now rents an ambulance to take me to VA see a idiot PN and take me home what a bunch of bull. How do I get out of this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vets:

There's no question that the VA is in the midst of both a formal and informal change of policy regarding narcotic pain meds driven by the news media  and congress. It's unfortunate because the media says that we are in the midst of a so called "narcotics epidemic"? As a result, many Vets that legitimately need their narcotic meds are being taken off or scaled back significantly to appease politicians and the news media it appears? I'm sure a lot of VA Doctors disagree with this policy but their hands are probably tied? It's been reported in the media that there are some Vets that have abused or diverted their VA prescribed meds? However,  that's all that is being focused on now and there will always be a small percentage of misuse in any large system--despite what the authorities do? Frankly, most Vets don't want to screw things up with their  Doctors and guard against any wrong doing. I've heard that most doctors now are very intimidated by the DEA  and feel threatened concerning the potential of loss of  their medical license about prescribing narcotics even if it's necessary for the patients health and well-being. So, it's easier to deny a patient what they really need to control their pain rather then dealing with the DEA? Also, the DEA is trying to do a good job are not the "bad guys"  here and I don't fault them for trying to save Veteran lives? Frankly, I think this is an aspect of the issue of the so called "drug epidemic" that must be addressed to show what happens to Veterans with long-term chronic pain issues that have been suddenly been pulled off of narcotics? I heard one politician say recently with no medial degree or experience that "only VA patients with terminal cancer"  should receive narcotics from the VA?  Veterans are now suffering from this policy and this "overreach" is increasing the suffering of numerous  Vets who were injured defending their country. Clearly, the media needs to tell the "unbiased" side of the story. However, that does not sell newspapers and magazines and run well with the cable talking political heads at night, many of whom have never served a day in the military? For every death that occurs from narcotics abuse, there are probably a 1000 other Vets being pulled off of their pains meds without cause or a formal review in which a Vet can have a say-so with regard to their pain meds and the abrupt changes at how they are being prescribed? Consequently, if a Vet argues for his/her rights, in many cases they are often labeled as a "drug seeker" and discredited which seems unfair?

Frankly, whenever  there is a  mix of government policy with politics there are going to be significant problems and losers. A patient's injuries  and the doctor/ patient relationship used to best determine the types and kinds of pain meds  that a Vet required and took? Unfortunately, many vets have been injured severely and have been on narcotic pain meds north of 10-20-30  years. But I've been hearing of vets lately being abruptly pulled off of their narcotics which seems to be a violation of medical rights and/or care protocols? Some vets have called to get their narcotic meds renewed ( in the hadit.com forum) which they have done so for years, and suddenly there are such long delays in which some vets have reported going into withdrawals because the new prescription coordination does not happen in time?  It appears to be a policy "overreach" in many cases and nobody seems to understand the rules and/or what the DEA actually wants and expects of the VA? Another, amazing  irony is that today I saw that the latest Defense Appropriations Bill has a provision in which states that have legalized marijuana, that Vets in those states can use marijuana on a recreational basis without getting in trouble at their local VA's? I live in the Seattle Area and was really apposed to legalizing marijuana for recreational use, but medical use is a different story if it actually help vets with something like cancer? So, it's just odd to me that the VA is doing this while they are pulling Vets off their narcotic  meds that they need? So, it shows that politics are playing a major role in what is going on across the country with narcotic pain meds and the news media needs to be convinced just how this policy is actually hurting and not helping Vets -so the balanced side of the story can be told.

Anyway, Take Care and Godspeed....Rootbeer22

 

 

Edited by rootbeer22
typos
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎5‎/‎20‎/‎2016 at 7:03 PM, rootbeer22 said:

Vets:

There's no question that the VA is in the midst of both a formal and informal change of policy regarding narcotic pain meds driven by the news media  and congress. It's unfortunate because the media says that we are in the midst of a so called "narcotics epidemic"? As a result, many Vets that legitimately need their narcotic meds are being taken off or scaled back significantly to appease politicians and the news media it appears? I'm sure a lot of VA Doctors disagree with this policy but their hands are probably tied? It's been reported in the media that there are some Vets that have abused or diverted their VA prescribed meds? However,  that's all that is being focused on now and there will always be a small percentage of misuse in any large system--despite what the authorities do? Frankly, most Vets don't want to screw things up with their  Doctors and guard against any wrong doing. I've heard that most doctors now are very intimidated by the DEA  and feel threatened concerning the potential of loss of  their medical license about prescribing narcotics even if it's necessary for the patients health and well-being. So, it's easier to deny a patient what they really need to control their pain rather then dealing with the DEA? Also, the DEA is trying to do a good job are not the "bad guys"  here and I don't fault them for trying to save Veteran lives? Frankly, I think this is an aspect of the issue of the so called "drug epidemic" that must be addressed to show what happens to Veterans with long-term chronic pain issues that have been suddenly been pulled off of narcotics? I heard one politician say recently with no medial degree or experience that "only VA patients with terminal cancer"  should receive narcotics from the VA?  Veterans are now suffering from this policy and this "overreach" is increasing the suffering of numerous  Vets who were injured defending their country. Clearly, the media needs to tell the "unbiased" side of the story. However, that does not sell newspapers and magazines and run well with the cable talking political heads at night, many of whom have never served a day in the military? For every death that occurs from narcotics abuse, there are probably a 1000 other Vets being pulled off of their pains meds without cause or a formal review in which a Vet can have a say-so with regard to their pain meds and the abrupt changes at how they are being prescribed? Consequently, if a Vet argues for his/her rights, in many cases they are often labeled as a "drug seeker" and discredited which seems unfair?

Frankly, whenever  there is a  mix of government policy with politics there are going to be significant problems and losers. A patient's injuries  and the doctor/ patient relationship used to best determine the types and kinds of pain meds  that a Vet required and took? Unfortunately, many vets have been injured severely and have been on narcotic pain meds north of 10-20-30  years. But I've been hearing of vets lately being abruptly pulled off of their narcotics which seems to be a violation of medical rights and/or care protocols? Some vets have called to get their narcotic meds renewed ( in the hadit.com forum) which they have done so for years, and suddenly there are such long delays in which some vets have reported going into withdrawals because the new prescription coordination does not happen in time?  It appears to be a policy "overreach" in many cases and nobody seems to understand the rules and/or what the DEA actually wants and expects of the VA? Another, amazing  irony is that today I saw that the latest Defense Appropriations Bill has a provision in which states that have legalized marijuana, that Vets in those states can use marijuana on a recreational basis without getting in trouble at their local VA's? I live in the Seattle Area and was really apposed to legalizing marijuana for recreational use, but medical use is a different story if it actually help vets with something like cancer? So, it's just odd to me that the VA is doing this while they are pulling Vets off their narcotic  meds that they need? So, it shows that politics are playing a major role in what is going on across the country with narcotic pain meds and the news media needs to be convinced just how this policy is actually hurting and not helping Vets -so the balanced side of the story can be told.

Anyway, Take Care and Godspeed....Rootbeer22

 

 

 

 

It all depends on can you pass a drug test or not you don't pass you are cut off.

They can't just cut you off your meds. Me I wish my state let me smoke marry jane

It helps more than them pills you need. The thing is vets are hooked and most don't

Even know when they're  are hook because they have a habit which is they have to have narcotics

just to live an everyday life. I been off narcotic pills three years now with no regret and no drug test

to get my meds. Get off pills if you can you are still using drugs whether its pills or Maryjane. narcotic

is just that. You should try something different pills kill. jmho

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use