Jump to content

  • veteranscrisisline-badge-chat-1.gif

  • Advertisemnt

  • Trouble Remembering? This helped me.

    I have memory problems and as some of you may know I highly recommend Evernote and have for years. Though I've found that writing helps me remember more. I ran across Tom's videos on youtube, I'm a bit geeky and I also use an IPad so if you take notes on your IPad or you are thinking of going paperless check it out. I'm really happy with it, I use it with a program called Noteshelf 2.

    Click here to purchase your digital journal. HadIt.com receives a commission on each purchase.

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims


    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   


  • Advertisemnt

  • VA Watchdog

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

Sign in to follow this  

Not Recommended: Bosley & Bratch

Recommended Posts

I do not recommend Bosley and Bratch.

When I first contacted them, I had to send in all information I had.

I am on SSD, and had received an award at 60%, which as many who would read the award letter was the bare minimum on all issues.

They told me that since their was an paperwork stating that they (VA) was considering 100 percent that they did not want to intervene till that was resolved.

I have since then been to the RO office in Indy and have talked to them (VA) 800# and their is no paperwork that they have stating that they was considering 100% especially since I did not have a single issue at or above 40%.

I called Bosley and Bratch at the Indy location and after several phone calls they said they would not represent me because none of my issues was VA service connected and I was not disabled.


I am on SSD so yes I am disabled, and every issue that got me SSD is also on my VA claims and the combination of those got me too 60%.

The only thing I needed them to do is dot my I's and cross my T's to get what I should be getting for each of those issues.. which ultimately would get me very close to 100%

They told me before I hanged up on them, was that the only way they would represent me was if I was service connected by a VA doctor stating so.

Sounds like they want me to do the work....

Anyway, sounds like they are just lazy and don't want to take any risk.. not that there would be any really.

Edited by kevin4998

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is lucky you found out now that they are incompetent and not down the road at the BVA. I had to shop my case around to a number of lawyers. They were just lazy and wanted a quick buck. The lawyer I got was and is willing to go all the way so far. Every time we came into contact with the VA he got more outraged since he had done SSD claims for years. When he saw my C-File he could not believe the state it was in compared to SSD files.


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many competent VA lawyers turn down more cases than they take. They "skim the cream" and only take those they know they can win, and I dont blame them. The VA makes lawyers wait 5 years for their money also. How many people do you know who would work, and only maybe get paid in 5 years? The delays get to attorneys, too, and I met one who no longer takes VA cases as they just take too long to get their money.

Yes, you are going to have to have a doctors nexus statement, the lawyer can not do that for you. If you dont have a statement close to "The Veterans xxx condition is at least as likely as not related to xxxx that happened in military service, you are very unlikely to get service connected unless you are willing to get an IMO saying the same. This is not the lawyers fault, its a VA requirement.

When shopping for a lawyer, often you get turned down 2 or 3 times before you find one who likes your case. Many lawyers have a "market niche" and like certain kinds of cases, likely because they won those before, and yours may or may not fit in their criteria. Yes, they have criteria, too.

I have had at least 3 lawyers not return my calls...they are just to busy to take on new cases. Case in point: Mr. Carpenter in Kansas. He has won many and carefully screens new cases to meet his criteria. Another example: NVLSP. They win about 90% of their cases, in no small part by screening out the ones they think they cant win.

Edited by broncovet

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

And if they did charge you money, or try to, contact the Bar Association in your state.

I did that once, had a lawyer who snookered me.....he tried to cut me off the phone after he got my money ,when I complained at his lack of expertise , but I managed to get him to hear me clearly say that my next phone call would be to the NJ Bar Association.

Within hours that same day my money was refunded to me in person by a courier.

(which is really funny because his office was directly diagonal to my backyard when I lived in a city.He could have made the check into a paper airplane and thrown it into my backyard and called me to tell me to pick it up.)

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand fully what your saying, that being said this wasn't a case of proving SC. That has already been done by the VA and I am at 60% for that. All I need to do was get the current rating percentage to what is more inline with what I believe they should be. I know what I think they should be and what they will end up to be are two different things. I believe fully that the first rating decision was a low-ball and just to clear their back-log.

I have been looking for specialty doctors for each of my issues. I want to make sure I get the right doc for each issue and ones that are familiar with what I need done.

Easier said then done.

This particular lawyer's office advertises that they would send people to those kind of doctors. And, I have dual insurance at the moment to help with those doctor fees if need be. Figured hiring them was my best to way too find those kind of doctors. I don't really care about ANY retro I could possibly get. I just want to get too the point where my ratings reflect what they should appropriately should be.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By saltynurse
      My husband is in need of a criminal lawyer who helps veterans asap. He did something while ptsd symptoms were high and now needs criminal help. Before these charges were given we were working on getting him help with his ptsd, which I told him he should go get help as this will show he is trying to not make this mistake again. The VA referred me to VSO who could only refer for help with claims, not criminal. I've contacted my caregiver coordinator, social worker and the primary, with no answer. I need to get on this asap and I know there are lawyers who only work with veterans but have hit a dead end. Any help, is greatly appreciated! 
    • By humiliari
      My brother served at Tyndall Airforce Base in the United States Airforce. He now has Young Onset Parkinsons Disease. We have no family history of this in our family. I started to research causes of his condition, this led me to finding out about environmental contaminates and Parkinsons. I came across disturbing information about Tyndall AFB and contaminates of concern noted by the EPA at this post. It is a Superfund site. I was sickened by what I found. Numerous contaminates, complete negligence and disregard by Tyndall AFB, etc. I am now helping my brother to file for service connection. I have compiled overwhelming evidence (pictures, test results, letters to Tyndall from EPA, news reports, scholarly articles, known medical opines on the matter, etc.) from reputable sources. I am continuing this effort by going on sites, such as this one, trying to get firsthand accounts and knowledge from anyone who has served at this instillation, and mainly, has acquired motor system disorders, due to environmental contaminates. But I am open to any knowledge about any disorder acquired from environmental contaminates at this instillation. I would greatly appreciate any thoughts about this topic as well. Thank you for your time and effort in regards to this matter.

    • By ShuMan
      Any one ever used Law Offices of Gordon & Doner (injuredveterans.com). Everyone I have spoke too so far there has been great and they agreed to take my case. 
      I just wanted to see if anyone else has used them in the past?
    • By kevin4998
      AND she makes 70k a year to make light of Veterans issues.. now that's the joke.


    • By deville905
      My claimed was shut down and closed July 4, 2014, but haven't received my BBE yet which should come any day. I'm tired of dealing with VSO's who has no Idea of whats going on beside lunch. Anyone heard of a good attorney in Memphis, Jackson TNor w Memphis AR.
  • Ads

  • Our picks

    • Enough has been said on this topic. This forum is not the proper forum for an attorney and former client to hash out their problems. Please take this offline
    • Peggy toll free 1000 last week, told me that, my claim or case BVA Granted is at the RO waiting on someone to sign off ,She said your in step 5 going into step 6 . That's good, right.?
      • 7 replies
    • I took a look at your documents and am trying to interpret what happened. A summary of what happened would have helped, but I hope I am interpreting your intentions correctly:

      2003 asthma denied because they said you didn't have 'chronic' asthma diagnosis

      2018 Asthma/COPD granted 30% effective Feb 2015 based on FEV-1 of 60% and inhalational anti-inflamatory medication.

      "...granted SC for your asthma with COPD w/dypsnea because your STRs show you were diagnosed with asthma during your military service in 1995.

      First, check the date of your 2018 award letter. If it is WITHIN one year, file a notice of disagreement about the effective date. 

      If it is AFTER one year, that means your claim has became final. If you would like to try to get an earlier effective date, then CUE or new and material evidence are possible avenues. 


      I assume your 2003 denial was due to not finding "chronic" or continued symptoms noted per 38 CFR 3.303(b). In 2013, the Federal Circuit court (Walker v. Shinseki) changed they way they use the term "chronic" and requires the VA to use 3.303(a) for anything not listed under 3.307 and 3.309. You probably had a nexus and benefit of the doubt on your side when you won SC.

      It might be possible for you to CUE the effective date back to 2003 or earlier. You'll need to familiarize yourself with the restrictions of CUE. It has to be based on the evidence in the record and laws in effect at the time the decision was made. Avoid trying to argue on how they weighed a decision, but instead focus on the evidence/laws to prove they were not followed or the evidence was never considered. It's an uphill fight. I would start by recommending you look carefully at your service treatment records and locate every instance where you reported breathing issues, asthma diagnosis, or respiratory treatment (albuterol, steroids, etc...). CUE is not easy and it helps to do your homework before you file.

      Another option would be to file for an increased rating, but to do that you would need to meet the criteria for 60%. If you don't meet criteria for a 60% rating, just ensure you still meet the criteria for 30% (using daily inhaled steroid inhalers is adequate) because they are likely to deny your request for increase. You could attempt to request an earlier effective date that way.


      Does this help?
    • Thanks for that. So do you have a specific answer or experience with it bouncing between the two?
    • Tinnitus comes in two forms: subjective and objective. In subjective tinnitus, only the sufferer will hear the ringing in their own ears. In objective tinnitus, the sound can be heard by a doctor who is examining the ear canals. Objective tinnitus is extremely rare, while subjective tinnitus is by far the most common form of the disorder.

      The sounds of tinnitus may vary with the person experiencing it. Some will hear a ringing, while others will hear a buzzing. At times people may hear a chirping or whistling sound. These sounds may be constant or intermittent. They may also vary in volume and are generally more obtrusive when the sufferer is in a quiet environment. Many tinnitus sufferers find their symptoms are at their worst when they’re trying to fall asleep.

        • Like
  • Ads

  • Popular Contributors

  • Ad

  • Latest News
  • Create New...

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines