Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

83-Year-Old Pleads Not Guilty To Falsifying Veterans Affairs Travel Vouchers

Rate this question


carlie

Question

" BANGOR, Maine — An 83-year-old Lincoln man pleaded not guilty Wednesday in U.S. District Court to falsifying travel vouchers submitted to Veterans Affairs.

William D. Brundage admitted that he received more than $6,700 in reimbursements for travel from Lincoln to Augusta when in fact he received a ride from a fellow veteran to the Togus Veterans Affairs Medical Center, according to the complaint.

U.S. Magistrate Judge Margaret Kravchuk released Brundage on $5,000 unsecured bail with conditions that he not travel outside the U.S., and he remove a firearm from his home. Brundage’s travel was restricted to Maine, New York and the states in between, so he may continue visiting his son once a month. He also was ordered to abstain from drinking alcohol.

The Korean War veteran allegedly received reimbursements illegally between Jan. 20, 2011, and Feb. 15, 2013. He received $6,754, and the person who drove him to the facility received $5,915 during the same time period, the complaint said.

The Bangor Daily News is not naming the person who drove Brundage to Augusta because he has not been charged with a crime.

Brundage has a permit that only allows him to drive a vehicle if a licensed driver is in the car with him, according to the complaint.

Matthew Erickson, the Brewer attorney appointed to represent Brundage, said after the arraignment that his client “does not want to get benefits he is not entitled to receive. I think there’s more to the story.”

Full article : http://bangordailynews.com/2013/08/28/news/penobscot/83-year-old-pleads-not-guilty-to-falsifying-va-travel-vouchers/

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

Actually there aren't enough parking spaces at our RO. We do carpool to get one of 37 parking spaces for almost two hundred employees. Others pay for parking year round on average 10 dollars a day until they come up in a rotation to get into a parking place for a year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

This is BS.......I really do not know the rules on travel, I think I got a buck twenty five one time, but what struck the nerve was the gun removal. While I understand this might fall under a "Felony" charge I think this should not be an issue until such charge is actualy awarded under a conviction.

I also think there is more to this than reported.

Do yourself a favor.....buy some gold and silver! The printing presses are in overdrive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Long and the Short of it.

If you are riding with someone else in their car you souldn't be filling out a travel claim. There could be exceptions, but if you arn't willing to describe the entire arrangement to the clerk at the window or an investigator (if when they come calling) then you shouldn't be suprised when your charged. As for the gun removal, I don't find that such an oudious requirement for bail.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use