Read Disability Claims Articles
View All Forums | Chats and Other Events | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Search | Rules
- 0
Dro Review Question
Rate this question
Read Disability Claims Articles
View All Forums | Chats and Other Events | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Search | Rules
Rate this question
Question
Berta
My POA's head bigwig claims there is no record of a meeting my vet rep had with my DRO.
The vet rep told me he specifically called her The DRO)'s attention to my two IMOS (Dr. Bash and Dr. Rabiee).
The SSOC they sent me stated there had been an informal meeting between the DRO and my vet rep.
NADA mentioned in the SSOC on the IMO evidence which cost me 2 thousand bucks-
NADA on the other medical evidence I sent in numerous submissions-
and of course none of the medical evidence or IMOs were listed as evidence.
MY vet rep called me to tell me the he discussed the IMOs with the DRO.
I hate phone calls because they are not hard copy.
Yet my POA has no proof even of the meeting- let alone the presentation of my IMOs.
But the SSOC says the meeting did occur.
Question- in a DRO conference with a vet rep doesn't someone have to document what was discussed?
Dont get me wrong- I have known this vet rep for 20 years and dont want to doubt him as to what he told me by phone but still the evidence (SSOC) clearly shows my 2,000 buck stuff was not even mentioned.
Am I Nuts? or should the IMOs have been reviewed and considered-
especially if a high level vet rep presented them to the DRO because VARO had already ignored them in a prior decision?
and should this critical type of evidence been documented during this DRO informal conference?
Thanks, Berta
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
4
2
1
1
Popular Days
Aug 23
8
Top Posters For This Question
Berta 4 posts
carlie 2 posts
admiral7 1 post
olenavygoat 1 post
Popular Days
Aug 23 2006
8 posts
7 answers to this question
Recommended Posts