Jump to content
VA Disability Community via Hadit.com

 Ask Your VA Claims Question  

 Read Current Posts 

  Read Disability Claims Articles 
View All Forums | Chats and Other Events | Donate | Blogs | New Users |  Search  | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024-2.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

They Sure Like To F*** W/ Me!

Rate this topic


Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Phil

Who paid B&M? Since you don't have an award I guess you did not sign on for a 20% cut to them. I don't understand why they would not get you to sign a contract and stay with you until the end if they believe in your claim?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 20
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • HadIt.com Elder

John - they were paid by the EAJA, a total of $7996 and change, for about 43hrs work, over a period of 9 months. They told me that they felt they weren't needed anymore, as it was headed back to the AMC & BVA, but to contact them should I decide different. And yes, I did sign a contract.

So far it's cost the VA/EAJA about what they'd have paid me, if they awarded the claim. And some wonder why our Gov'ts in trouble! Just sayin'

pr

Edited by Philip Rogers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

John - they were paid by the EAJA, a total of $7996 and change, for about 43hrs work, over a period of 9 months. They told me that they felt they weren't needed anymore, as it was headed back to the AMC & BVA, but to contact them should I decide different. And yes, I did sign a contract.

So far it's cost the VA/EAJA about what they'd have paid me, if they awarded the claim. And some wonder why our Gov'ts in trouble! Just sayin'

pr

pr,

I thought there was a whole lot more riding on this than 8 K :-(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

pr,

I thought there was a whole lot more riding on this than 8 K :-(

Carlie - they would owe an SMC "s" award from 4/89, which I guesstimate would be around $50-$60k. The first time it went to the CAVC I think EAJA paid about $20k and the attys won a remand then. So maybe it's only cost them about half but it should have won from the get go. The evidence is there and that's just based on the 100% inferred "s" award issue. In 2010, I had ratings of 100+20+10+10+10+10, w/a 1.9 bilateral factor, which should have automatically awarded the "s" award, using simple addition, not the combined ratings table (CRT), which is illegal because it's punishing a veteran who's already 100% disabled and has a zero ability worth by saying he's whole again and using the CRT. jmo

pr

Edited by Philip Rogers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dang. You one fart smeller, PR. That's a high art form in the VA litigation scheme of things. Call B&M pronto. Sweet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use