Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Accrued Benefits - Reopening - Missing Service Records


free_spirit_etc

Question

As my husband's discharge physical is not in his C-file, and there is not any indication it was ever in the C-file - if I can ever obtain a copy, does that mean I can use it as new and material evidence to reopen any and all claims that were denied because the SMRs didn't show X (as long as the claimed condition / symptom was mentioned on discharge physical)?

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

sorry for quadruples........satelitle problems cant del;ete

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Berta!

"I just meant that VA will look for a smoking history to try to deny asbestos claims."

That was one thing that really threw me for a loop at my hearing. I mean there is no reason to hide the fact my husband smoked.... but there was no reason to highlight it either - unless it tied directly to proving the claim. I took my IMOs to show my husband's cancer started in service (so what caused it is not totally relevant).

What was one of the first things the VSO asked me?

Is it true your husband started smoking before he joined the service?

Huh??? Why in the world would MY representative be asking me that???

I said I don't know. He rolled his eyes. I said I didn't know for a fact when he started smoking. I didn't know him back then.

So he asked how much my husband smoked.

But again - why in the world would your OWN representative even be asking those questions.

It seemed like he was working on getting the claim denied.

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Something very interesting is reading some of the decisions for the brief period of time that the VA covered smoking related illnesses and the veterans had to prove it was more likely than not that smoking caused their COPD, cancer, etc. The VA examiners were pulling all kinds of reasoning out of their hats to explain that they didn't know for sure that smoking caused anything.

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"If you have submitted 2 additional independent medical opinions, since the SSOC was issued, that fully conform to the IMO criteria in our IMO forum,

and if these opinions support your claim with a full medical rationale for SC death (which of course would support the accrued benefits claim for the same disability) than you should succeed."

This was the part I had been puzzled about because the IMOs were not in the record on the date of death. So I didn't know IMOs could be submitted for accrued benefits. But then I started noticing the BVA sought medical opinions for accrued benefits claims. So I guess that means I can't submit more medical records, etc. - but since medical opinions are needed to actually decide the claim - then medical opinions that are written based on the evidence that was in the file would count.

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It isnt an unusual question......the rep was looking to see if there was potential to claim, since the cigs were possibly Gov issued and in his C rats, that he began smoking in the Mil.

Also..years ago I was asked by my former rep to help an asbestos vet.

I met the vet and he gave me permissions to review his records and ask questions.

The first question I asked him was if he had ever smoked a thousand cigarettes while on board his ship.No? how about a hundred? or 5 packs?

He laughed and said he never smoked at all.

Then I said, you sailors never played any card games on board ,did you ...he really laughed at that one.

I whipped out a picture I downloaded of his ship.....she was a beauty and he really started talking about his service ( he slept under the asbestos laden pipes) and his MOS,I had already checked and found was listed at "highly probable" on the VA PIES list.for asbestos exposure.

I then gave him a print out that showed our Navy had to send his ship to Iran as be dumped as salvage ,because they could not possibly remove all of the asbestos it contained.

He had a form of colon cancer that I had done considerable research on.and that was as likely as not due to his asbestos exposure.

ll he needed was an IMO to support the info I found.

But he died suddenly, with no dependents ,who could continue the claim. This work can be heartbreaking.He was a lovely man and also I helped with his 1151 claim. The VA really buggered him up but good .

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"It isnt an unusual question......the rep was looking to see if there was potential to claim, since the cigs were possibly Gov issued and in his C rats, that he began smoking in the Mil."

I thought that claims based on tobacco use were no longer covered. I know for a time, they did cover them on the basis that the veteran's tobacco dependence started in the military. But they don't cover that anymore (unless another service connected condition, like PTSD, causes you to smoke.)

I guess it was okay that he asked the question. It just surprised me it was the first thing he asked in the hearing.

That is so touching - your story about the Vet. I remember when I was doing training for massage therapy, one of my clients in clinicals was a man in his 90's. He always told me not to massage him like an old man - to really give him some PRESSURE! He had some significant back pain - poor guy. But I remember he was gone for a couple weeks. His wife and him went to Hawaii. When he returned - I asked if he had seen Pearl Harbor. "Seen it???" He said, "Hell! I was there when they BOMBED it!!!"

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use