Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Finally Going After Sc Comp For Injuries Rec'd In My 1971 Suicide Attempt

Rate this question


Philip Rogers

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

Well, I'm finally gonna do it!

In the wee morning hours(around 01:00am) of April 26, 1971, I had an "accident" where I proceeded to ride a borrowed Honda, 350cc, motorcycle into a parked car, at a high rate of speed, in an attempt to kill myself. There was/were no alcohol or drugs involved. In 4/1989, I found out I had PTSD and have probably had it since serving as a combat infantryman/paratrooper, w/the 1st Bde(Abn), 1st Cav Div(Airmobile), from 7/1965 - 9/1967, based on a social/behavioral history.

I spent 5 days in ICU, unconscious, 3 wks in the hospital and have had multiple surgeries after and due to that "accident." I filed a claim, for those injuries, w/the VA and was awarded 100% NSC pension w/the injuries rated at 70%, retro to 4/26/71.

In the mid 2000's or so, after many yrs of VA counseling, I realized that the "accident" wasn't just an accident but was "as likely as not"(my words) a suicide attempt.

I've finally decided to file a CUE claim, on my original award. My feeling is that "in those days" a claim for NSC Pension is a claim for SC Compensation and a claim for SC Compensation is a claim for NSC Pension. The VA never considered Service-Connection.

I expect this claim will probably take 10 yrs or more to decide.

pr

Edited by Philip Rogers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 11
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Also keep in mind that if a cue, then the rules in effect at the time would take precedence.

J

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

You know the rules on psychotic and neurotic ratings changed between 1971 and 1973. I filed a CUE for a claim filed in 1972 that was decided in 1973 and it got remanded because of rule change for rating mental disorders that happened between times. That cost me an extra couple of years of wait time. This got by the BVA and was caught at CAVC.

Car wrecks for guys with depression/PTSD is and was one of the most common ways to do a suicide. I wonder if Phil ever talked to a shrink while in VA care. Did anyone do work-up for head injury with psychological tests that might have shown depression. My psychological testing from 1972 disappeared from my file.

Phil, did you ever get a DX of depression from the VA before the PTSD DX in 1989? Did you ever see a shrink in the military for anything to do with sleep problems or alcohol abuse or anything that might have pointed to depression? You know how it is with CUE's. They only deal with what was or should have been of record when original rating was made.

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Nope, never knew I had a problem until 1989. All my friends drank. I had over 40 jobs. I don't remember the accident and was unconscious for 5 days, in ICU. My main thing is getting the residuals rated as SC. They gave me 70% NSC permanent & total, at the time. My contention is that they should have known. We'll see what happens. Should be fun. I realized it was a suicide attempt thru my counseling.

pr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry I just don't see this as being a valid CUE, you indicate your PTSD was diagnosed in 1989. PTSD wasn't in general use as a recognized diagnosis until the early 80's. unless the medical records from the time clearly and explicitly have it noted that you attempted suicide, then you still have to link it to an EXISTING SC diagnosis that was present in 1971.

If you didn't realize it was a suicide attempt until 18 years later(after lots of therapy), how was a decision maker in 1971 supposed to make that conclusion? Were you diagnosed and being treated for any mental health condition at the time?

"My contention is that they should have known" should have, would have, could have. You have to prove they DID know, otherwise it isn't CUE.

I would agree that if your mental health and counseling records (for all years) indicate that the 71 accident was an attempted suicide then the residuals of that crash should be Service Connected on a secondary basis, but your not going to get an effective date of 1971.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Sorry I just don't see this as being a valid CUE, you indicate your PTSD was diagnosed in 1989. PTSD wasn't in general use as a recognized diagnosis until the early 80's. unless the medical records from the time clearly and explicitly have it noted that you attempted suicide, then you still have to link it to an EXISTING SC diagnosis that was present in 1971.

If you didn't realize it was a suicide attempt until 18 years later(after lots of therapy), how was a decision maker in 1971 supposed to make that conclusion? Were you diagnosed and being treated for any mental health condition at the time?

"My contention is that they should have known" should have, would have, could have. You have to prove they DID know, otherwise it isn't CUE.

I would agree that if your mental health and counseling records (for all years) indicate that the 71 accident was an attempted suicide then the residuals of that crash should be Service Connected on a secondary basis, but your not going to get an effective date of 1971.

You are probably right but much like today, the VA knew many VN vets were committing suicide, upon return to the states. I need to research the medical and psyche journals published at the time. I'd done some research previously about scrub typhus and found articles warning civilian medical personnel that some of us would be returning w/scrub typhus and to be aware of it. I'm sure there were articles published about psyche problems in returning vets, also.

I doubt I'd get any retro money but my residual damage should be service-connected. It's worth looking into. jmo

pr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use