Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Dva Private Internet

Rate this question


GuaymasJim

Question

Has anyone ever been able to access information on DVA's private internet?

Here is an example:

http://vaww1.va.gov/CBO/appeals.asp

DVA policies on their various directives are found there, but there does not seem be be a way to access it. I know my way around a computer and the internet, but nothing I've tried has worked.

I am especially interested in the example above. I am attempting to file and administrative healthcare denial straight to the BVA, but am not getting the VAMC to give me a written signed denial on which I can file a NOD.

Any thoughts or ideas"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 11
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

The VA can deny health care if this form is not properly filled out, or the information isnt properly stated in it . It is in Section II:

Section II - Insurance Information: Include information for all health insurance companies that ... if required to do so, will result in denial of VA health care enrollment. ... Section VI - Previous Calendar Year Gross Annual Income of Veteran, ...

http://www.va.gov/VAForms/medical/pdf/vha-10-10ezr-fill.pdf

In other cases the Office of the Inspector General VA ,upon contact from the veteran, will intervene in any denial of what they determine to be a Patient Safety Issue.

We had a vet here that OIG helped right away in that regard.

I didn't find his initial; post.

:

“I am attempting to file and administrative healthcare denial straight to the BVA, but am not getting the VAMC to give me a written signed denial on which I can file a NOD.”

What documented evidence do you have that shows you have been denied healthcare?

I think this would be a matter for the VHA to resolve, and not the BVA.Then again we dont know why they denied the healthcare?

Here are the IG's state by state investigation numbers:

http://www.va.gov/oig/about/investigations-contact-list.asp

I have always faxed or emailed the IG in the past regarding various issues ,but today their email site says this:

Contact the OIG Hotline

The VA OIG Hotline is not currently processing complaints due to a lapse in appropriations for the VA OIG. We will resume normal operations when funding is restored.

Thank you for your interest in the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Other Contact Resources

E-Mail: vaoighotline@va.gov

FAX: (202) 495-5861

Mail:
VA Inspector General Hotline (53E)
810 Vermont Ave., NW
WASHINGTON, DC 20420

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PS, I think I should add......if a veteran is improperly denied VA health care, and that denial leads to a Section 1151 issue,

the 'denial' of health care then becomes an "omission of an act", under Section 1151, 38 USC.

'Omission of an act' means the VA failed (omitted) to do the proper steps medically that led to a veteran getting an additional disability or dying.

Personal example:

Husband (combat SC vet and VA employee) is rushed to the Bath ER while on his job because he had collapsed.

EKG the same day revealed abnormal heart patterns and stated right on top possible or probable ischemic event.

The ER diagnosed him with sinus infection ,sent him home for 3 days, and 'omitted' reading the EKG or treating him with any follow up care ,even though the Med Certificate called for that to be done to "R/O CAD". The VA never followed up on the ER certificate and the EKG until 6 years later and then tried to cover up the earlier incident because I had questioned the doctors about it, not knowing at that time what the ER cert had said.

That ER certificate was my prime piece of initial evidence for my FTCA/1151 claims.

One could say he had received a 'denial' of medical care but that was not really the issue.....the VA did 'treat' him on that day and subsequently until he died for the next 6 years.

but their treatment 'omitted" acts that would have medically saved his life, which is often the main basis of many successful 1151 claims resulting from misdiagnosis.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One more PS on this....it sure gives me flashbacks because Monday is the anniversary of my husband's death....19 years ago.....

When I got smart and got his med recs, and filed under FTCA/1151, I did plenty of research....not easy at all in those days, at the local county law library and at Corning College library.

I found something after sending many days looking through files of VA internal documents.

What I found was that in the VA doctor's M21 , the doctors were supposed to treat employees with the idea to get them back on the VA job ASAP!.

I got a copy of that M21 page and sent it along with my medical evidence.

I had discovered t why he didn't get proper care that day. They treated my husband as an employee and not as a SC veteran.

Things changed radically when I made a stink about that.Most of my friends were VA employees as well as SC veterans.

There was even scuttlebutt in the dept my husband worked in (that held many PTSD Vietnam Vets) that VA might try to kill them all.

because they almost killed another SC vet in the same department and I helped him get 100% P & T under 1151 and the same year a non vet employee sued them and won because they treated her broken leg (an on the VA job accident, and VA was at fault) as an ankle strain. She still walks with a limp.

M21 for VA doctors has been revised since those days.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PR, it never works for me either. I have encountered this before as a drilled down into a particular VHA regulation. Look closely and you will see it is VAWW1.VA.gov When I run across it, the Directive always mentions that policies regarding this Directive can be found at ..... This is a VA only site. Or words to that effect.

A vet can appeal a medical decision like which medication or which procedure within the VAMC, but no higher. A vet can appeal an administrative decision directly to the BVA: NOD--SOC--Form 9 in other words the whole nine yards without going through the VARO. This is what I am struggling to do.

Here is the directive: VHA DIRECTIVE 2008-039 which was recently superseded by VHA DIRECTIVE 1032. You will notice on the last page:

c. Appeals Procedure Guide, found at:
http://vaww1.va.gov/cbo/apps/policyguides/contents.asp?address=VHA_PG_1601G.
NOTE: This is an internal VA Web site and is not available to the public.

First, I have grave reservations about a governmental agency using tax dollars to produce policy information that is restricted from the public. Second, and more to the point, if a vet doesn't know which hoops (s)he has to jump through, then how can they jump through them; and how does the system give the vet due process?

Berta, you are a treasure. I only wish you had acquired your knowledge in a different manner. I have a well founded fear that I am going down the same spiral as your husband.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use