Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

3 Week Progress Report

Rate this question


NavyWife

Question

I've been at this for only 3 weeks, but due to the awesome folks here at Hadit, I have learned an immense amount of information already. I've been glued to my laptop averaging 8 hours per day for the last 3 weeks. I think my eyes are going bad from reading BVA cases, however!!! haha

Here's the rundown on what I've done so far:

#1 Mailed official application form 21-526EZ as a Fully Developed Claim using certified mail, return receipt requested. At this time, I am only requesting an evaluation for 2 issues. Increase for previously service connected seizures currently with a lowball rating of 20%. Also, claiming TBI. There are definitely more issues, but I want to start with the 2 that are affecting him the most. Also, I feel we have good medical evidence and service records to prove service connection for the TBI due to a fall and head injury he sustained while on active duty. I also included a Statement of Support regarding the frequency of seizures. I opted not to include a doctor's report of the frequency at this time, because I had read once epilepsy is service connected, they can accept medical OR lay evidence regarding the frequency. If they want the medical evidence also, then they can schedule a C&P exam.

For the TBI, I had read VA will want to do their own evaluation, nexus and their own diagnosis, so I did not include any medical evidence for that either. However, I had the veteran write up a list of his symptoms that are bothering him that also match what is found in the 38 CFR Schedule for Rating Disabilities guide under TBI (8045).

Additionally, I included the dependency form 21-686c. I filled it out completely, but opted not to include a copy of marriage certificates or birth certificates for the kids. I've heard they are trying to streamline the dependency additions and only need those certificates in certain cases.

We will see if my minimal approach works or not. I figure if they need more documents, they will mail me a letter requesting them.

#2 After about 2 weeks of phone calls, I was finally able to get the logon for the EBenefits Premium account. I am hoping that site will be useful at some point in the future.

#3 I requested his records from NPRC using the online system and followed up with a faxed signature page. https://vetrecs.archives.gov/VeteranRequest/home.html

#4 I sent a written letter to the VARO requesting a copy of his c-file.

#5 Bought this VA claims guidebook on Amazon from Asknod

http://www.amazon.com/s?ie=UTF8&field-author=Asknod&page=1&rh=n%3A283155%2Cp_27%3AAsknod

#6 read and reread until I thoroughly understood the rating guide VA uses for the conditions he is claiming using the Online Code of Federal Regulations

http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?c=ecfr&sid=1fba67e9494507e5b9f58baa3f412824&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title38/38cfr4_main_02.tpl

TO DO NEXT WEEK:

Take him to the VA medical center where he was last treated and attempt to get his personal medical records.

Take him to a VA medical center and do the in-person proofing to get the Premium account for MyHealthE Benefits website.

Start preparing my case for the denial that VA usually hands out. (I don't expect to be denied for the increase in seizures. But I expect they will try to deny the TBI)

Edited by NavyWife
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 12
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Go figure, they want to keep that form top secret!

Carlie,

Since the seizures are already service connected & the ratings guide goes by frequency only, can you think of ANY reasons they would try to deny the increase for seizures?

If they decide to grant the increase, will they start his payments at the higher rate as soon as they decide, while they're still working on the TBI claim?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He is rated for 8910 only.

That's a great idea to search the BVA for TBI after 2008. I will do that.

I'm hoping to have some of his records by next week. I will post asap. The only thing I have is a letter from 1997 saying he is rated at 20% for 8910. It is a single page and does not say how they came to that number.

Edited by NavyWife
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Go figure, they want to keep that form top secret!

Carlie,

Since the seizures are already service connected & the ratings guide goes by frequency only, can you think of ANY reasons they would try to deny the increase for seizures?

If medical or lay evidence is submitted, for an increased evaluation of SC'd seizures due to frequency,

and the decision maker finds this evidence to be credible and probative, then an increase should be warranted.

A new C&P exam might be needed.

If they decide to grant the increase, will they start his payments at the higher rate as soon as they decide, while they're still working on the TBI claim?

It will most likely be processed together.

JMHO - carlie

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He is rated for 8910 only.

That's a great idea to search the BVA for TBI after 2008. I will do that.

I'm hoping to have some of his records by next week. I will post asap. The only thing I have is a letter from 1997 saying he is rated at 20% for 8910. It is a single page and does not say how they came to that number.

NW,

This is my train of thought.

When you get a copy of that actual rating decision, it will either have the reasons and bases

for the decision or a narrative for the decision.

This should show WHY they granted seizures as SC'd.

Hopefully it will state something like - seizures are SC'd due to brain trauma / concussion / head injury / fall.

Hell it might even contain some kind of statement relating to additional symptoms / conditions, etc . . .

So might the SMR's and original copy of the C&P exam used in that rating decision.

That evidence would CLEARLY open the door for an easier chance at TBI - SC.

Something else, I believe I pointed out earlier to you is:

http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?c=ecfr&SID=53e65b731a212b27b244fa7475784ea9&rgn=div8&view=text&node=38:1.0.1.1.5.2.110.67&idno=38

The Epilepsies:

A thorough study of all material in §§ 4.121 and 4.122 of the preface and under the ratings for epilepsy is necessary

prior to any rating action.

http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?c=ecfr&SID=53e65b731a212b27b244fa7475784ea9&rgn=div8&view=text&node=38:1.0.1.1.5.2.110.63&idno=38

§ 4.121 Identification of epilepsy.

When there is doubt as to the true nature of epileptiform attacks, neurological observation in a hospital adequate to make such a study is necessary. To warrant a rating for epilepsy, the seizures must be witnessed or verified at some time by a physician. As to frequency, competent, consistent lay testimony emphasizing convulsive and immediate post-convulsive characteristics may be accepted. The frequency of seizures should be ascertained under the ordinary conditions of life (while not hospitalized).

http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?c=ecfr&SID=53e65b731a212b27b244fa7475784ea9&rgn=div8&view=text&node=38:1.0.1.1.5.2.110.64&idno=38

4.122 Psychomotor epilepsy.

The term psychomotor epilepsy refers to a condition that is characterized by seizures and not uncommonly by a chronic psychiatric disturbance as well.

(a) Psychomotor seizures consist of episodic alterations in conscious control that may be associated with automatic states, generalized convulsions, random motor movements (chewing, lip smacking, fumbling), hallucinatory phenomena (involving taste, smell, sound, vision), perceptual illusions (deja vu, feelings of loneliness, strangeness, macropsia, micropsia, dreamy states), alterations in thinking (not open to reason), alterations in memory, abnormalities of mood or affect (fear, alarm, terror, anger, dread, well-being), and autonomic disturbances (sweating, pallor, flushing of the face, visceral phenomena such as nausea, vomiting, defecation, a rising feeling of warmth in the abdomen).

Automatic states or automatisms are characterized by episodes of irrational, irrelevant, disjointed, unconventional, asocial, purposeless though seemingly coordinated and purposeful, confused or inappropriate activity of one to several minutes (or, infrequently, hours) duration with subsequent amnesia for the seizure.

Examples: A person of high social standing remained seated, muttered angrily, and rubbed the arms of his chair while the National Anthem was being played; an apparently normal person suddenly disrobed in public; a man traded an expensive automobile for an antiquated automobile in poor mechanical condition and after regaining conscious control, discovered that he had signed an agreement to pay an additional sum of money in the trade. The seizure manifestations of psychomotor epilepsy vary from patient to patient and in the same patient from seizure to seizure.

(b) A chronic mental disorder is not uncommon as an interseizure manifestation of psychomotor epilepsy and may include psychiatric disturbances extending from minimal anxiety to severe personality disorder (as distinguished from developmental) or almost complete personality disintegration (psychosis). The manifestations of a chronic mental disorder associated with psychomotor epilepsy, like those of the seizures, are protean in character.

The two regs above are current and were current in his rating decision, but without knowing
the whats and whys of the rating decision, there is no way yet - to know if these things were considered.
Why do I have any concern with this ?
Because, in my mind the original C&P exam and SMR's that were used to grant SC for seizures COULD include
something to the effect, something like,
veteran appears to be having anxiety that relates to his seizure condition, blah, blah,blah . . .
then THAT - would be something that MIGHT be CUE-able, from the prior decision.
Yes - I'm a goof ball and love to rip claims / issues, to shreds -
I approach claims / issues from both sides - the claimants and the VBA decision makers.

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

You sound like you've got your game on. The only other suggestion I have is that you purchase the Veterans Benefits Manual (VBM). It's the only guide you'll ever need for dealing w/VA claims. The new 2013 edition is due out any day, now.

http://www.lexisnexis.com/store/catalog/booktemplate/productdetail.jsp?pageName=relatedProducts&prodId=12734

It's a little pricey but well worth every penny (about $150 paperback)

pr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use