Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Yea Buddy - Finally Won The Cue I Submitted !

Rate this question


carlie

Question

I've been fighting this dependency issue for 30 YEARS !

Finally resolved under my submission of CUE.

Just got a letter from my VARO, date Oct 16th, (my Mom's B-day).

"What We Decided

Upon review of your files, the Department of Veterans Affairs determined that

an unmistakable error was made in regards to dependency benefits for your child,XXXXXXX.

It was also determined that you had submitted adequate dependency verification

and evidence within 1 year of our original notification letter requesting evidence for your dependents.

Therefore, we have taken action to retroactively add your child,XXXXXXX, to your award

effective XX,XX,1978, the date you became eligible to add dependents.

Your child,XXXXXXX, was retroactively removed from your award on the date your compensation

rating was lowered to 20% service connection and you no longer were eligible to receive

additional dependency benefits.

Evidence Used To Decide Your Claim

In making our decision, we used the following evidence:

Copy of Birth Certificate for XXXXXXX received August 16, 1978.

SSA Share screen print out dated October 9, 2013.

All evidence of record within claims file.

Please let us know whether your child attended a VA certified institution of higher

education and was unmarried between the ages of 18 and 23. We may be able to

retroactively add her to your award if legitimate evidence is provided."

blah - blah - blah !

WA - HOO - sure isn't much cash - but I WON MY CUE.

My daughter is almost 40 years old now and I am giving the rerto money to her.

Zippa - De - Do - Da

Zippity - A

My - Oh - My

It's a Wonderful Day !

Ha - ha - Ha - ha ...... it's a win, a win, a win !

YEA.

Heck, if I would have been paid an hourly minimum wage to fight this

issue for 30 years - I'd be sitting on gold bed-rock by now.

Finally - finally - finally - I can put this issue to bed . . .

although, I do see, that it's 4 months less than it should be.

I think my choice will be to let this battle go.

I still have a fish I'm frying and have to submit that paper-work

prior to Oct 26th.

Y - I - P - E - E ! ! ! ! !

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 24
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

carlie - thank you, thank you, thank you!!!!!!! I just realized the VA never adjusted for my son when I won in 1999. Time to send in another "gross error" claim. Should be somewhere around $3k or more. Thanks again for making me think!!

pr

Just check the facts,write it up, look it over a couple of times and go get em tiger !

Remember - you helped teach me that !

You have the 20 years covered, that body armor's a good feeling !

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

"These throw downs getting VBA benefits can and do, cause real harm and problems in our life's, both emotionally and physically. I say this because for me personally, the more I get upset and out - of - whack emotionally - it has quite a negative impact on me physically."

That is something I am dealing with right now. I see several claims that should have been granted, but have no option to file a CUE in order to get accrued benefits because my husband didn't file a CUE on them during his lifetime. And even if he did, a widow often has to fight to be able to continue that battle. I have read decisions that said a widow couldn't raise a CUE because a veteran didn't raise it during their lifetime. And I see decisions that say that even if a veteran did raise a CUE during their lifetime, that a widow doesn't have the right to prosecute a claim.

It bothers me that though it appears my husband's discharge physical was NEVER associated with his claim file (which appears to be the case as they did not mention it in any decisions) they never tried to obtain it, never informed him it was missing, and never gave him a heightened benefit of the doubt as required by law.

In fact, after I called it to their attention it was missing - and have several IRIS to them back and forth trying to obtain a copy after his death (in which I pointed out that his SMRs state a discharge physical was done and a form was completed) they just told me by IRIS they didn't have it. They didn't make any attempts to obtain it, or officially notify me it was missing, and send me information of other records that might be used, etc. Nor did they mention in either the SOC or SSOC that his discharge physical was missing from his C-file.

So I could ask for them to locate his discharge physical, and readjudicate his claims if it can be located. And there are some claims that I might be able to advance as pending and unadjudicated.

However, as my husband was retired military, the financial gain from the battle would be minimal even if I won them. Concurrent receipt didn't start until 2004, and it was still pretty minimal at that time for Vets with less than 100%.

So I really have to weigh whether the battle would even be worth it, even if I won.

I understand that last statement. Sometimes it's better to let it go and move on, w/life. On the other hand, for some, it's an honor thing. Either way it's your choice.

I can tell you I started w/the VA, again, back in 1989, when I was at their office one day and saw a notice on the bulletin board about recovering some school expenses, that covered a period I was in school, in the late 70's. I won about $2400. Then I won a partial on the big AO settlement, w/Dow Chemical. Then the VA awarded me 30% for PTSD. I quickly joined the DAV, for life, because I didn't want them to realize there was "nothing wrong w/me." I appealed the 30% and did an in house PTSD program, where I realized just how F**ked up my life had been, due to PTSD. I read a pamphlet by Jim Goodwin, http://www.suicidewall.com/ptsd-etiology/ and cried like a baby, as I felt someone was writing about me.

I won TDIU twice, during my appeal process, and eventually won 100% retro, just for TDIU, back to my original claim date. I have an appeal in for housebound ongoing since 1999, that'll should be retro to 1989. I won a CUE for my daughter for Chap 35. I'm working on an appeal for my ex, where they cheated her out of Chap 35. And it goes on and on. The VA uses laypeople so claims are routinely done wrong.

Your chances are way better at winning w/the VA than winning any lottery. jmo

pr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, it is an "honor thing". When I applied in 1989, I was merely cashing in my chit for the promised care I knew was related to my service. Never in my wildest dreams would I have thought my honesty and character (credibility) would be questioned. We Vets had no access to the internet and many of my records were still classified until 1992-96. I had no idea VA would characterize my claims as "contentions" or "allegations'. Those are fighting words to me. I did sign non-disclosure agreements with several agencies but nowhere did I sign off on the rights promised me when I signed up. While I may sound petty and immature, when promises are made and gifts are exchanged, it is expected that the government will not engage in bait and switch tactics. Using artful semantics and legal punji pits is no way to conduct business. Nevertheless, as Veterans, that is what we face daily.

In order to make my point that an honest accounting of all monies due and owing is in order, I will not retreat one month- let alone four. If I give it all to my attorney in the process, so be it. The scales of justice will be balanced- hopefully before I reach room temperature. When you are in the military, it makes no difference if you are "loaned out" to alphabet agencies. Your paycheck is the ultimate determiner of who pays later. I intend to make them keep their bargain-every last dime. Win or Die, ladies and Gentlemen. As someone once said " Leave no one behind...Not on a paper trail. "And my heartfelt congratulations to Carlie on a job well done. Great teaching moment, young lady.

Edited by asknod

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use