Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

The 2013 Vbm Is Out!

Rate this question


Berta

Question

YUM YUM 2204 pages Mine just came.

If you already have an account with Lexis Nexus you will probably get it in the mail if you on on automatic delivery.

Many wonder why they get a new VBM that has so much of the older stuff in it as well as new stuff.

For 7 years I worked for a law firm and we got updated supplements all the time.

It was miserable to deal with laws and then have to go to the most recent citations and supplements in order to have the most current info.

VBM contains updates ,within each chapter that prevents the need for publishing supplements.

They did publish a supplement once in 1991 or 1992 and I found it was very difficult to keep cross referencing to the actual VBM they sent out that same year.

The VBM has helped me succeed in all of my claims.

It is imperative in my opinion for vet reps to use the VBM but they usually dont..

And I feel it is imperative that us hardcore advocates have it.

150 plus S&H, and tax , and 120 plus S&H and tax for Advocates.

It might be at amazon too by now.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

I have had a relationship with NVLSP since 1991, when I purchased their very first VBM and felt comfortable calling Ron Abrams about a few things in it and I took their Basic Training Course many years ago.

NVLSP knows I have done advocacy for veterans for a very long time. Also I have sent donations to them.over the years.

Also their head Nehmer attorney and I have discussed the 2010 Nehmer Training Guide at length and he was very helpful in explaining nuances of Nehmer to me for anyone here at hadit who needed info (from the horses mouth so to speak, as NVLSP won the Nehmer case)

and I even posted here excerpts from some of his emails regarding the 2010 Nehmer AO presumptives.

They were very glad I kept posted their Agent Orange email addy here too as many contacted them via that addy at hadit.

If you have done a lot of advocacy work for veterans, you could call NVLSP and ask them if you could receive an advocates discount.

I have donated to them much more than the discount amount I got over the years. The last donation I made got me a surprise conference call with 3 or 4 lawyers at NVLSP I know, because it helped them get a new PC program developed.

Since this is a non profit Pro Bono law firm, dedicated solely to helping veterans, they were very happy to get that program going.I think it had something to do with the VBM CD

Every AO Nehmer veteran or survivor who has succeeded in their AO claim with a favorable retro EED has NVLSP to thank for that.

And the annual VBM is a fabulous investment to make (buying their new CD as well).

I have won every claim I have had ( and have been a claimant over over 20 years)

(except one was denied because it was awarded on a different basis)

and I cant wait to succeed in my pending issues, so I can again write a good sized check to NVLSP.

The history of NVLSP and what they have done for veterans (in addition to the monumental Nehmer decision) is within the VBM.

If all vet reps purchased the VBM or their orgs did that for them, we would have by far more reps educated in 38 CFR, and certainly more vets they represent would be able to succeed in their claims.

Their information on CUE alone is worth the price of the VBM and helped me win my SMC CUE claim .......for which my former vet reps said I didn't have a chance on that.

Many of us do volunteer work for vets orgs, also many of us have commented on Fed Register VA regulation changes and are on many of the vet sites, easily googable, so internet claims help we give is memorialized and can prove an advocate is,in fact an active veteran's advocate.

I will find NVLSP's phone number for you, in DC and I suggest you call them and ask for the discount as an advocate......Lexis Nexis doesn't give the discount. It is approved by NVLSP.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ms. Berta,

I hope you had a very happy Holliday week with another to come! Given your experience (as always), I have a question: would you suggest using the NVLSP as your power of attourney over a state organization? The reason I ask is because I have claims at various levels (initial claims for dependency, post-BVA/post-AMC actions) but cannot get traction for any of these to move forward. Or, is the NVLSP an organization from which you should request help when you go to the CAVC (if any claim needs to go to this level)?

Limbo is status quo for the VARO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Justrluk, NVLSP handles AO claims under Nehmer but aside from that they also get involved in certain CAVC cases.

I dont know how they do get involved with them....

Beverly Nehmer was the widow of a veteran who was incountry Vietnam and in that case, they repped her on long ago.....and since AO is the weapon of mass destruction that keeps on 'giving' , they sure had their hands full getting Nehmer 2010 squared away.

I think they might seek cases at the court that might become precedent setting cases that would, like Nehmer, affect MANY instead of the specific CAVC claimant.

http://www.nvlsp.org/what-we-do/individual-representation/

And they have been involved in other class actions , in addition to Nehmer:

http://www.nvlsp.org/what-we-do/class-actions/ and the consortium program:

http://www.vetsprobono.org/

Also they have an extensive LawyersServing Wqarriors program as well for VA claims help:

http://www.nvlsp.org/what-we-do/lawyers-serving-warriors/

They did rep us Nehmerinos after the 2010 regs, as long as VA had sent them our names and addresses on a potential Nehmer list (many of us did not get on those RO lists....another case whereby VA itself hindered vets and widows of AO vets from even filing a claim under the new presumptives)

and they certainly represented anyone here who contacted their email addy with a Nehmer claim.

"I have a question: would you suggest using the NVLSP as your power of attourney over a state organization?"

I would use a ham sandwich to hold my POA over a state vet org.

But that is a good question..... I dont think they hold POA except for certain specific situations mentioned above but they are user friendly and here is their phone number if anyone needs. 1- 202-265-8305.

Iraqvet ,I dont have that CD, but they just sent me the new concise one .$218.26... with advocates discount.

I think these forms are easily accessible here at hadit or at the VA web site.,and would be invaluable on a CD for a vet rep to have.

Also for anyone who expects the VBM but has not received it yet, Lexis Nexis sent out letters this past summer to anyone with an account with them ,which made very little sense so I called them up... the letters were to confirm if you still wanted automatic receipt of the VBM.

Lexis Nexis can be reached at 11-202-340-9721

And Ron Abrams gave me the advocate discount in around 1995..??? I think it was.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use