Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

*** All Members - Please Read ***

Rate this question


carlie

Question

I am posting this issue, in this forum because I feel it is

the most widely viewed forum.

Lately we are having quite a bit of hijacking on topics / threads.

This is an issue we all need to pay a bit more attention to as it detracts

from helping one another and just starts a bunch of confusion.

What is hijacking ?

"Thread hijacking is the process of replying to an existing thread with a different topic.

This is generally discouraged.

It is better to start a new thread if you have a problem that is related to an existing posted issue but clearly different. Posts that hijack a thread with off-topic discussion are also discouraged."

How about we all try to be a bit more courteous and if what you are going to post

into the OP's topic does not relate to their topic - start a new topic of your own.

Here's an example of topic / thread hijacking from Urban Dictionary.

"Below is a thread, consisting of an original posting and commentson that original posting. They illustrate a thread hijacking.

original posting: I'm so excited that my cat has learned to use the toilet with City Kitty! The training seemed like it took forever, but it's so worth it to not have to deal with a litter box any more! Has anyone else done this?

comment 1: Ugh! I just started training my cat, but he can't seem to move beyond the orange stage. How'd you get through that?

comment 2: I'm training my dog at PetCo classes.

She's very smart. She learns the commands faster than the other dogs.

comment 3: I'm training my dog in PetCo classes too.

They have great trainers. They're patient with the dogs and the people.

Comments 2 and 3 are off topic and are hijacking this thread.

The person who made comment 2 should have started their own thread.

The person who made comment 3 is guilty of continuing the hijacking."

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 12
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Thanks for clarifying that. But an outright h*jack is easier to notice than a gradual shift. And I think the drifts happen a lot; where there is some content about the original post, but additional content also, and the thread starts following the direction of the additional content, until it changes directions again. It is sometimes harder to know what to do in those situations . I think because sometimes issues overlay each other and what started out being one issue becomes another issue. It is sometimes hard to get issues to fit into well drawn lines. And I am not talking about just outright h*jacking. But it is kind of like even in normal conversation, the topic seems to flow from where it started. So it is kind of human tendency to follow the flow rather than stay very restricted and limited to one topic.

But I do understand that you would like us to stay on point as much as possible, and certainly not just h*jack a thread.

But this topic (including starting new threads) raises another question. What is the appropriate way to do that? If you want to respond to someone in the drifted thread, it is kind of hard to start a new thread, because you are responding; not asking a question. Do you just start a new thread and post a link and hope they follow you over to the new thread?

Also -- Is it okay for the OP to move the thread in a different direction? Sometimes with one issue answered, there are more, and very different questions. So the thread can shift then. But if they start a new thread, with the new issue, they have to move relevant info over from the other thread, or people have to go over and check. Or people are responding with limited information, because they weren't following the other thread. Sometimes that aggravates people and they admonish the poster for starting a different thread. Or sometimes a poster has several issues and post several different threads and they are told to put it all in one thread.

I am really not trying to be difficult. But I am not always sure of the protocol - even on the threads I have started -- wondering if the topic has changed from the original topic enough that I should start a different thread as a starting point, or if I should just keep moving in a different direction in the ongoing thread. Sometimes it seems like either way you go, someone might get aggravated.

Again, I am not trying to be difficult.... It just isn't always clear cut what is the best choice.

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's a raccoon been coming on my porch lately- any ideas on humane way to drive him off?

Another good example of off topic hi-jacking : - )

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic was started on a serious note to try and help the

flow of information.

Obviously - it has been hi-jacked - so now it's closed.

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use