Jump to content
  • Donation Box

    Please donate to support the community.
    We appreciate all donations!
  • Advertisemnt

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims

    questions-001@3x.png

    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
     
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   

    tinnitus-005.pngptsd-005.pnglumbosacral-005.pngscars-005.pnglimitation-flexion-knee-005.pngdiabetes-005.pnglimitation-motion-ankle-005.pngparalysis-005.pngdegenerative-arthitis-spine-005.pngtbi-traumatic-brain-injury-005.png

  • Advertisemnt

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

Sponsored Ads

  •  ad-free-subscription-002.jpeg     fund-the-site.jpg

  • Searches Community Forums, Blog and more

  • 0
KDM

Bva, Amc, Vso, Remand Confused?

Question

I had a remand of an appeal case from 2004 it was remanded 7 30 2013 to AMC, they the AMC then finished the remand collected what the remand asked and sent it back to the BVA. The BVA then sent it to a VLJ who sent it to the VSO for a written argument, before deciding my case. Question 1 the RO told me that there was no SSOC from the AMC is a plus I think they messed up. Question two if the AMC sent it back then isn't the AMC denying my remand by sending it back to the BVA?

Quiestion three I have watched the ebenefits board and it's

Showing me the 7 30 2013 remand from a 2004 appeal is closed and the 10 31 2013 appeal sent back to the BVA from the AMC this is from the 2004 appeal is now a new case hense the VLJ to VSO situation so shouldn't I recieve a letter if the AMC denied me or granted me a partial? Question four can they include a 2007 cnp from the 2004 appeal as well but a secondary condition to the initial appeal residuals from an operation that the AMC refuse to look at but was ordered by the BVA in the 7 30 2013 remand tolook at this 2007 cnp is in my favor

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

Ad

Have you contacted your VSO? If the VLJ sent it back to the VSO for written argument, then the VSO should be able to let you know what is going on with it at the moment.


"Question four can they include a 2007 cnp from the 2004 appeal as well but a secondary condition to the initial appeal residuals from an operation that the AMC refuse to look at but was ordered by the BVA in the 7 30 2013 remand tolook at this 2007 cnp is in my favor "

I am not really understanding exactly what you are asking here.

Edited by free_spirit_etc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I call this the statue of liberty play. The quarterback (BVA) passes the ball to a receiver (AMC) The receiver then passes it back to the Quarterback. Then it starts over again. The only thing good about the AMC is absolutely nothing.

I suggest you obtain an attorney and try to get it out of the AMC.

If a Veteran goes to the BVA without an attorney, They take advantage of that and send you to the AMC. That is one thing that attorneys have a major advantage over VSO's

Basser

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What are you appealing? A rating or a service connection or something else?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also- if it went from AMC to BVA that usually means AMC did not fully grant your appeal. You should get a letter from AMC explaining this with an ssoc. I'm not aware of a situation in which a file would move to BVA from AMC without an soc or ssoc. If the AMC fully grants your appeal it would move from AMC to RO with no ssoc...

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Ads

  • Ad

  • Latest News
  • Our picks

    • I filed for my mitral valve regurgitation heart disease secondary to a service-connected condition on 7-30-18. It was granted on 8-30-18. Since I filed for this heart valve issue and was awarded, can I still file for hypertension ? I have been seeing comments that you should file for hypertension first and file for heart disease as a secondary. Can I file for hypertension as a secondary to my heart disease ? I am alittle confused on this matter.

      Dan
    • How to Change the Theme - Look and Colors
      How to Change the Theme - Look and Colors
      • 5 replies
    • For Calculating Retro

      VA Disability Compensation Rates 2012 | 2011 | 2010-2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999

      Prior to 1999 check here https://www.hadit.com/va-disability-compensation-rates-historic-for-retro-calculation/
      • 0 replies
    • I am a 100% disabled veteran, At first I was super excited to find out I am getting retro pay for back benefits to 2006. But that was over 2 months ago. I been waiting and waiting and calling to ask them wheres my back pay. They first told me "one month" than I call again. The guy started reading a script of basically "we are malingering on paying you" type crap. I was wondering if there is any number I can call besides that 800-827-1000 number to inquire about my status. I don't know why its taken so long when there is specific information telling them from the judge that VA owes. 

      There was a remanded to see if I was eligible for IU (I get it now since 2014 im actually 90% with 10 of that been IU). I been on SS since 2004. Can Someone help me out? Thank you
      • 6 replies
    • You might have a 38 CFR 3.156 situation-

      meaning the VA might have considered your claim in 95/96 as "not well grounded" and failed to even get your STRs.Or they did get your STRs but never considered the specific entry you cited here.

      Lots of discussion under a search, of 38 CFR. 3.156 (a)(b) (c) ---here is a winner:

      https://community.hadit.com/topic/52994-cue-in-failing-to-apply-the-provisions-of-38-cfr-§-3156c-for-effective-date/

      o

       
        • Thanks
×

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines