Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

C-File Not Complete

Rate this question


63SIERRA

Question

I requested a copy of my c-file several months after rating for kidney removal due to kidney cancer . there was nothing in my c-file at all abt my kidney surgery. why would this be ? the files were in my med recs at the local vamc, which I have copies of.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

OKay, here ya go . . . a lesson in VA. The VA has two sections. The VHA (Veterans Health Administration) or VAMC's and the VBA (Veterans Benefits Administration), also know as the Veterans Service Center or Claims and one has nothing to do w/the other. Your info will never go from the medical side to the claims side until/unless you release it to go there.

It's one of the many systems the VA has set in place to screw the veteran out of benefits.

pr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this is somewhat odd. Since they granted you SC for the removal of your kidney, it sure seems like the records from the surgery that removed it would be in your C-file.

Are the records listed as evidence on the decision where they granted you SC for the kidney removal?

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

no mention of kidney at all, yet I have a stack of records in my medical file that could choke a goat abt it

I just found out something new as well, a few nights ago I was looking thru my medical records, and found a radiological report

dated in 2003 . They were looking at my LIVER after the 48 weeks of hep c treatment. at the bottom of the radiological report, after it described my liver, in a seperate paragraph, it said that there is a 5 centimeter cyst on the top of the right KIDNEY. When I read this a few night ago, I was shocked to say the least. THEY HAD NEVER MENTIONED IT TO ME. I lknew nothing of the growth on my kidney until the girl doing my ultrasound noticed it ,while doing a scan of my kidney with the ultrasound machine, she said, hmm that isnt right, but wouldnt tell me what she saw. well that night 10 pm, a doctor calls me, and told me I need to get in for tests ASAP. They found something on my kidney. It turned out that my adrenal gland, kidney and part of my renal vein was cancerous and were removed. so now I wonder, why did they not tell me abt the finding back in 2003? WHY did they not track it, because it was a big surprise when the ultrasound tech discovered it in 2011. would my whole kidney, adrenal gland and part of my relanl vein have needede removal had they done something at it earlier. I feel like im living in a nightmare that has no end.

A few days ago, I was telling my VSO abt it, and right after I told him, he told me they had called a meeting, and he had to go, and would call me back, well he never did. I called back the next morning and told the secretary we had been cut off and I needed to speak with him asap. So friday, they close at 2,pm. I got a call around 2,30 and wife answered. she said he acted like he couldnt hear her, and hung up; .. SO im abt fed up with this bullshit and am going to start looking into professional legal help. Ive started to learn to trust my gut instinct, and my gut is telling me that im being jerked around. from my understanding its a policy that the vso has to return calls within 24 hours. he returned the call alright, then hung up.

Edited by 63SIERRA
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also the ct scan that is in my file right before they did surgery said the growth on my kidney was 5 centimeters, by 6 centimenters. by 7 centimeters. so how much it grew, from 2003 when they initially found it and ignored it, until 2011 when they removed it, is a mystery to me. But 5 centimeters is no spot, or tiny nodule or calcium ball that they should have dismissed. Im just in awe over this, and dont know what to do, since I have 3 claims pending. furthermore, they didnt pay me 100 for the kidney cancer at all, or the adrenal cancer. which is the same law as kindey., because its part of the endocrine system. 38 cfr says they should have paid me at the 100 percent rate, from the time they found it, till 6 months after treatment was over. I got 30 percent backdated to july 2012. I file my claim for kidney cancer oct 30 2011 had surgery july 31 2011 . it is just out of control. crazy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I recall someone on this site speaking of a 5150 claim or tort claim or something likel that .as I understand it u cant file a suit against the govt without first filing a claim. I just cannot think of any excuse they could give me, as to why they did not inform me of the finding on my kidney in 2003, and never routinely checked it after finding it, or track measurements or whatever. after the did the ct scan on 2011 they said they were quite sure it was cancer. so evidently they can see something with the machines, why couldnt they see it in 2003, or later on before the cancer had infested my adrenal gland and vein. ? Am I overeacting here?

Edited by 63SIERRA
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is an error on vsrs not to pull the records or import them into the new paperless system. On top of that the rvsr does a word search in the vamc system for claimed conditions. So in Essence it is pulled twice. Va RO has access to all vamc records. I can pull evidence from any vamc visited, and again it would be a quality error if I didn't. You'd be surprised how man extra volumes we make for same vamc medical records sent in by the veteran that we can and do pull ourselves.

Also, we submit a va form 7131 request for any medical records not in the electronic system at the vamc.

Also, Capri (vamc electronic system). Now has SOME access from 1989 to Present of dod records that may not be part of strs.

Just my .0000000002 cents

Edited by T8r
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use