Jump to content
VA Disability Community via Hadit.com

 Ask Your VA Claims Question  

 Read Current Posts 

  Read Disability Claims Articles 
View All Forums | Chats and Other Events | Donate | Blogs | New Users |  Search  | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024-2.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

Read First If Getting An Imo

Rate this question


Berta

Question

Tbird has very good info at the hadit Home page on IMOs.

I reworked a topic I posted here some time ago.and maybe it can be found better now:

Independent Medical Opinions can often be the only way a veteran or widow can succeed on a VA claim.

VA plays a war game called the War of the Words. The proper wording of an IMO is critical to VA's acceptance of it, as probative evidence.

Opinions obtained from private treating doctors are often free yet most independent medical opinions are needed from doctors with full expertise in the field of the disability and can be very costly.


However an award can easily absorb this cost with a few comp checks or the increases in comp that the claimant might never obtain without an IMO.


A Valid IMO must contain the following:

The doctor must have all medical records available and refer to them directly in the opinion.

In cases involving an in-service nexus- the doctor needs to read and refer to the SMRs.

Also the doc needs to have all prior SOC decisions from VA ,particularly those referencing any VA medical opinions and a copy of the actual C & P results is even better. The SOC or SSOC could parse or manipulate critical statements in the actual C & P exam.

The IMO doctor should define their medical expertise as to how their background makes their opinion valid.

They should be willing to attach to the IMO their CV (Curriculum Vitae that contains their medical background and any other info pertinent ,such as any symposiums they attended, articles they had published etc etc,if possible, that show their expertise .)

A psychiatrist cannot really opine on a cardiovascular disease.

An internist cannot really opine on a depression claim.

They need to have expertise in the field of the disability you have claimed to make their IMO valid.

They should rule out any other potential etiology if they can-but for service as causing the disability.

They should briefly quote from and cite any established medical principles or treatises that support their opinion.

They should point out any discrepancies in any VA examiner’s opinion-such as the VA doctor not considering pertinent evidence of record in the veteran’s SMRs or Clinical record.

They should fully provide medical rationale to rebutt anything that is not medically sound nor relevant or appropriate in the VA doctor’s opinion.

They should then refer to specific medical evidence to support their conclusion.

They must use these terms: (VA is familiar with these terms)

"Is due to- 100%
More likely than not- Greater than 50%
At least as likely as not- 50% (Benefit of doubt goes to Vet)
Not at least as likely as not- Less than 50%
Is not due to- 0% from an post by carlie “

It helps considerably to identify pertinent documents in your SMRs and medical records with easily seen labels as well as to list and identify these specific documents in a cover letter that requests the medical opinion.



A good IMO doctor reads everything you send but this makes it a little easier for them to prepare the IMO as to referencing specific records.

Send the VA and your vet rep copies of the signed IMO.



And make sure your rep sends them a 21-4138 in support of it- you also- can send this form (available at the VA web site) as a cover letter highlighting this evidence.



PS- Mental disabilities- make sure the doctor states that you are competent to handle your own funds- otherwise, if a big retro award is due-the VA might attempt to declare you incompetent and it takes times to find and have the VA approve of a payee. (unfortunately many PTSD claims these days depend on a VA MH professionals diagnosis of PTSD and an IMO diagnosing PTSD will not be accepted by the VA. See our PTSD forum for the 2010 regs on that.

I need to add here that a secondary condition to an established SC condition wold not need the IMO doctor to read all of the SMRs.
They just have to state with medical rationale why the second claimed disabilty is due to (secondary to) the initial SC disability.

IMO docs must avoid words like 'maybe', 'possibly', 'could ' or 'might' be related to, or any other wording that VA could construe as speculative and then disregard the IMO for that reason.

On the other hand the IMO doc should look for any purely speculative statements in the C & P exam report or in the C & P and overcome those statements by stating they are mere speculation and have no medical basis.


DIC claims IMOs are different and the IMO doctor needs the death certificate and any autopsy findings and any past C & Ps as well as the entire clinical record (to include SMRs in some cases) and copies of any and all private records.

They need the rating info on the vet and what his or her SCs were for.

If the immediate cause of death is NSC but a service connected disability substantially contributes to death, the VA should award DIC.

Often this type of DIC claim definitely needs an IMO to clarify a substantial contribution to a NSC death.

1151 IMOs are different too.

The IMO doctor must identify the exact nature of the negligence with direct referrals to the med recs.

Then the IMO doctor must make a strong medical statement with a full medical rationale that the veteran has a documented disability that is directly due to the VA's negligence and give a full medical rational for that.

It is a good idea for a 1151 IMO doc to also add abstracts or citations from known medical practices in the 'standard medical community' to bolster a 1151 claim.

What I mean is showing the VA proof that non VA doctors (the standard medical community) would have taken different steps to diagnose and treat the veteran and the VA's “omission” of these proper medical steps caused the veteran's additional and documented disability.

Hope this all helps someone.

Link to comment

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I dont know- I posted that reference here 6 years ago.I tried to find it when I saw your question-but couldn't.

And under a  search for IMO, over 14,000 hadit entries popped up.

IMOs and IMEs have been discussed here for many many years.

I think I was the first claimant my so called former vet rep ever had , who also had IMOs from an expert.The state org I dealt with had never even suggested to any claimant that they needed an IMO/IME.

If anyone can, they should add anything they can think of to my IMO criteria here.

Then again Dr. Bash has helped many many veterans succeed based on this same criteria.That is how I was able to prepare it- I followed his statements in what he prepared for me.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
  • 0
On 7/19/2018 at 1:22 PM, Berta said:

It is imperative, to let an IMO/IME doctor see a copy of  whatever  C & P exam resulted in a denial of the claim

and also the decision as to exactly why the VA did not award the claim......was the C & P medically deficient

 or is there another reason for denial?

 

 

i have had a doctor helping with a dianosis of CAPD because the VA doesnt have any audiologist that can test for this disorder where i live. so i paid to see an independent dr. the dinal for my claim is based on no dianosis for this disorder and how i filed the claim (hearing loss) was proven by the VA as not service connected. 

my question is that i have the IMO from the dr giving my diagnosis and using the correct phrasing for nexus to my service. but they did not review my entire medical record, only records pertaining to this specific claim(ie hearing tests done by the VA) and i dont have a copy of my c-file yet as i just requested it a few months ago. is it really necessary to have her review both of these when she is not disputing the VA tests, but that they didnt perform the correct tests? does she need to see my whole record when only audiology is significant to her IMO?

thanks for any help you can give on this!

Link to comment
  • 0

If the test were performed by the VA you should be able to download the test results from My Health Vet. After logging in you can download your VA medical records. The IMO should state that they reviewed all your medical records in making the IMO. If the IMO is new evidence then you should be able to file a Supplemental Claim, if the VA already has it then you can file a Higher Level Review. You also have the option to file with the BVA.

Unfortunately it is very common for the VA not to take our evidence into consideration, that is what happened to me with my SA claim. I finally had to file with the BVA but I did win and had a retro check back to 8/2015. 

Don't give up and make sure you file timely. Good luck!

Link to comment
  • 0
1 hour ago, paulstrgn said:

If the test were performed by the VA you should be able to download the test results from My Health Vet. After logging in you can download your VA medical records. The IMO should state that they reviewed all your medical records in making the IMO. If the IMO is new evidence then you should be able to file a Supplemental Claim, if the VA already has it then you can file a Higher Level Review. You also have the option to file with the BVA.

Unfortunately it is very common for the VA not to take our evidence into consideration, that is what happened to me with my SA claim. I finally had to file with the BVA but I did win and had a retro check back to 8/2015. 

Don't give up and make sure you file timely. Good luck!

do they have to say they "reviewed all records" or can they say they reviewed relevant auiditory records? again i hate to ask her to review my whole record when just the puretone testing done by the va was reviewed. plus she did her own puretone testing. 

as far as the Supplemental, higher level or BVA goes- 

the original claim i put in was for "hearing loss". it is not really hearing loss but i reported symptoms of hearing problems during my C&P exam. you may have seen my posts on this already. so since i incorrectly identified my disability, the VA or the C&P examiner(not sure which), ignored my description of symptoms and rated me based on the puretone hearing test-of which i passed because my ability to hear noise at the proper decibels is fine. so i am worried that they are going to say that even though i am diagnosed properly now, the previous claims i put in for "hearing loss" dont count and i need to submit a new claim for CAPD(not being able to use the effective date of my original claims). 

hope all that makes sense

Link to comment
  • 0

I know there is some recent case law on reviewing SMR's.  I don't have the info here (at work right now) but will look later this evening.   A doctor not reviewing a veterans C-File or SMR's can no longer be grounds for denying a claim.  I am almost positive this is the case.  I will post again in a couple hours once I get the appropriate case law. 

Edited by JKWilliamsSr
Link to comment
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use