Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Struggling To Decide

Rate this question


GlassRose1500

Question

Looking for your thoughts please. I was very fortunate - I received my Bbe today and the early news I got from my DAV Rep was confirmed, 92% (90) scheduler, paid at 100% for IU, Permanent and Total.

I am so grateful and relieved. A big part of me feels like I should let any remaining issue go because I don't know if I have the strength to tackle them, esp. when the big picture says comp at 100%. AND it would be one more (or several more, depending on how the above would have to be tackled) action for the system to have to grind out. Getting in the way of other claims for folks still fighting for what they need. What they deserve.

Would appreciate your thoughts.

  • Unadjudicated issues
    • Right lower extremity radiculopathy (from 07/11). If adjudicated according to the same evidence present for the right lower extremity would likely be 20% and a bilateral factor. When I asked my VSO about it in 2012 they said it must have been rated at 0% - and I was completely uneducated about it then. I now see that it was not rated - not addressed in any of the award documentation, but clearly addressed as a claim in the original claim.
    • Aid & attendance (from 01/13)). Strong VA Home Health Care evidence. My VSO put in a pension claim in April of 2013 (on top of the claim that just completed), and then promptly retired. The new VSO said hell no get rid of that, so I called and had them withdraw it. In the Bbe today it shows they withdrew pension AND Aid and Attendance. But said I had a year to tell them I would rather have had them adjudicated it.
  • SCM related to
    • aid & attendance and
    • one impairment at 100% (MDD 70% and basis of IU) and the other unrelated impairments adding to greater than 60% - Kind of a big deal if = SMC L or L.5 as the DAV Rep felt it should be
  • An error in the rating for Migraines based on the language in the decision itself (the Bbe Reason for decision described headaches as averaging once per week - which is accurate and well documented - but in the next paragraph rated at 30% due to frequency being not greater than one per month).
  • Reduction in knees bilaterally from pain 10% and instability 10% to pain 10% but instability 0% based soley on C&P but with a large volume of VA records that say the contrary plus a ratable range of motion restriction from the C&P (limited to 45 degrees on left knee)

All of these issues are probably achievable with the potential benefits being a schedular 100, SMC L or higher, and no need to complete the yearly "I'm not working" form. There is some risk that tackling them with anything other than a CUE could open things up again, and as I've seen personally, reductions are possible. Recommendations?

Edited by GlassRose1500
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

GlassRose, First, let me the first to Congratulate you. Job well done. Secondly, If this was me, I would leave things alone lol, with the VA you never know what could happen second time around. When I received my 100 P&T yea there were things that I didn't agree with, but, I didn't want to seem ungrateful, so I decided to live with their decicion. I'm getting a bit to old to spend another year or so with the pressure and stress once again. Anyway once again congrats on your win. Now just relax and enjoy your retirement.

Semper Fi

Aggie

Edited by aggie54
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I would pursue them if it means money. You can hire a lawyer and let them fight the case. The lawyer could advise on CUE chances as well. By pursuing SMC's after I got P&T I got an extra $400 in my paycheck each month. I am pursing a CUE now that may put many thousands in my pocket. I got a lawyer for that one. I think the best defense for your benefits is a sharp offense.

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use