Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Denied Bronchitis 2004 Approved Asthma 2012

Rate this question


SigBnSoldier

Question

Two months ago I received my rating decision for PTSD and Asthma. Was awarded 70% PTSD/Bipolar and 30% Asthma, IU/P&T.

In October 2003 I submitted a 7 contention claim that included "bronchitis". The claim was denied one year later without ever having been called to any c&p exams. In the denial for "bronchitis" the reasons says there is no evidence in my service medical records or mention of bronchitis, that my symptoms are asthma and respiratory difficulties from flu like symptoms in my SMR's.

In April 2012 I submitted a claim for PTSD and Asthma, ordered a copy of my C-File for the first time, and there plain as day in my medical records are numerous treatments in service for bronchitis and asthma.

Had a C&P exam in April 2013 for asthma, the c&p doc scratched his head, it was a no brainer to him, the evidence was plain as day in my SMR's and I definitely had continuity evidence in my file as well as current diagnosis.

The ONLY new evidence I submitted with this claim was updated continuity evidence, as well as a single treatment record for an asthma attack at a German hospital which happened a year after I discharged. That being said, the VA treated this claim as a "reopen" claim and approved it easily, but under the diagnosis of Asthma.

My question-

Shouldn't the VA have re characterized the bronchitis claim as Asthma? Do I have grounds for an earlier effective date? The evidence was clear in my SMR's, which the VA did have at the time of the initial denial. Should I file for CUE?

And what will be the repercussions of filing such a CUE on my PTSD rating, will I be reevaluated and possibly lose my P&T even though I was just rated two months ago?

Thank you in advance, hope this post isn't too confusing.

80% IU/P&T

70% PTSD with Bipolar Disorder

30% Asthma

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Thank you, I've updated my profile and will start researching what I need to write.

Can anybody kindly point me to the CFR that covers disability recharacterization?

80% IU/P&T

70% PTSD with Bipolar Disorder

30% Asthma

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

This happen to me.my claim was the opposite. I file for Asthma and they said it was not in my file,but they said I had bronchitis in my record. So I filed for bronchittis and they denied it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Thank you, I've updated my profile and will start researching what I need to write.

Can anybody kindly point me to the CFR that covers disability recharacterization?

These may,or may not be what your looking for.

Hope it helps.

http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=9a81b41a0fa8da7da06ddf1f41d21da6&node=38:1.0.1.1.5.1.98.2&rgn=div8§4.2 Interpretation of examination reports.

Different examiners, at different times, will not describe the same disability in the same language.

Features of the disability which must have persisted unchanged may be overlooked or a change for the better or worse

may not be accurately appreciated or described.

It is the responsibility of the rating specialist to interpret reports of examination in the light of the whole recorded history,

reconciling the various reports into a consistent picture so that the current rating may accurately reflect the elements of disability present. Each disability must be considered from the point of view of the veteran working or seeking work.

If a diagnosis is not supported by the findings on the examination report or if the report does not contain sufficient detail,

it is incumbent upon the rating board to return the report as inadequate for evaluation purposes.

[41 FR 11292, Mar. 18, 1976]

http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=9a81b41a0fa8da7da06ddf1f41d21da6&node=38:1.0.1.1.5.1.98.8&rgn=div8

§4.13 Effect of change of diagnosis.

The repercussion upon a current rating of service connection when change is made of a previously assigned diagnosis or etiology must be kept in mind.

The aim should be the reconciliation and continuance of the diagnosis or etiology upon which service connection for the disability had been granted.

The relevant principle enunciated in §4.125, entitled “Diagnosis of mental disorders,” should have careful attention in this connection.

When any change in evaluation is to be made, the rating agency should assure itself that there has been an actual change in the conditions, for better or worse, and not merely a difference in thoroughness of the examination or in use of descriptive terms.

This will not, of course, preclude the correction of erroneous ratings, nor will it preclude assignment of a rating in conformity with §4.7.

[29 FR 6718, May 22, 1964, as amended at 61 FR 52700, Oct. 8, 1996]

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

In your original decision, what did they rate in the decision?? Generally the last page lists the SC ratings and the NSC ratings. Did they rate the asthma as NSC??

Try to understand that what you call CUE and what the VA calls CUE are two different things. A CUE can only be made one year or more after a final decision.

pr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Thank you for your responses, hope you all had a happy Thanksgiving.

I'm not so sure this is a CUE as much as I should file a NOD on my recent Asthma approval for an earlier effective date. In 2004 the rater writes in black and white that I have asthma. I also have solid continuity evidence from time in service to today. The evidence in the 2004 claim surely should have triggered VA's duty to assist and schedule a C&P exam for respiratory conditions, whether asthma or bronchitis.

I am terribly conflicted on whether to proceed with this, opening myself up to a complete re eval from the VA is a bit scary. My conditions haven't improved, that's not the fear, the fear is that my PTSD award was awarded under the benefit of the doubt, the stressor was not confirmed, but I had so many statements from guys in my unit and newspaper articles they accepted my statement. This is what I'm worried about, some new rater looking it over and claiming I need more proof. Which, I'm not sure I could find more. That is what I feel I'm risking.

80% IU/P&T

70% PTSD with Bipolar Disorder

30% Asthma

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use