Jump to content

Sponsored Ads



  • Latest Donations

  • Advertisemnt

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims

    questions-001@3x.png

    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
     
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   

    tinnitus-005.pngptsd-005.pnglumbosacral-005.pngscars-005.pnglimitation-flexion-knee-005.pngdiabetes-005.pnglimitation-motion-ankle-005.pngparalysis-005.pngdegenerative-arthitis-spine-005.pngtbi-traumatic-brain-injury-005.png

  • Advertisemnt

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

Sponsored Ads

  • Searches Community Forums, Blog and more

  • Donation Box

    Please donate to support the community.
    We appreciate all donations!
  • 0
shotkawla

Cue Advice

Question

When I filed for VA disability 8/1996 I was only rated for one condition, pulmonary vascular disease with a 60% rating. Fast forwarding 2011 – I submitted a claim and was granted 40% bilateral disability for VA code 7121. Here’s my question: Why wouldn’t VA rate me back in 1996 for VA code 7121 when it was in the clearly stated in my PEB decision from the navy. However, they rated me for it in 2011. I think the VA failed to properly adjudicate my disability back given the medical documents and PEB decision. Does this falls in the line of a CUE? Below is a synopsis of the Navy’s and VA’s decision.

NAVY

Category I: All Unfitting Conditions:

Diagnosis and ICD9 Date VA Code/Percent

Chronic Recurrent Pulmonary Embolization, 4151 05/28/1996 7199-6603 10%

Chronic Recurrent Deep Venous Thrombosis, 4538 05/28/1996 7121 30%

Category II: Those conditions that are contributing to the unfitting condition (s):

  • Hypercoagulable state, not further defined because of the patient being on anticoagulant, 2898
  • Tricuspid Regurgitation, 3970
  • Mild Chronic Leg Edema, 7823
  • S/P Pulmonary Thrombectomy, 74749
  • S/P Greenfield filter placement into the inferior vena cava, 433

VA DISABILITY AWARD

DATE FILED DATE AWARDED VA CODE PERCENT

8/1996 11/27/1996 6817 60%

8/2011 04/18/2013 7121 40% Bilateral legs

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

When I filed for VA disability 8/1996 I was only rated for one condition, pulmonary vascular disease with a 60% rating. Fast forwarding 2011 – I submitted a claim and was granted 40% bilateral disability for VA code 7121. Here’s my question: Why wouldn’t VA rate me back in 1996 for VA code 7121 when it was in the clearly stated in my PEB decision from the navy. However, they rated me for it in 2011. I think the VA failed to properly adjudicate my disability back given the medical documents and PEB decision. Does this falls in the line of a CUE? Below is a synopsis of the Navy’s and VA’s decision.

NAVY

Category I: All Unfitting Conditions:

Diagnosis and ICD9 Date VA Code/Percent

Chronic Recurrent Pulmonary Embolization, 4151 05/28/1996 7199-6603 10%

Chronic Recurrent Deep Venous Thrombosis, 4538 05/28/1996 7121 30%

Category II: Those conditions that are contributing to the unfitting condition (s):

  • Hypercoagulable state, not further defined because of the patient being on anticoagulant, 2898
  • Tricuspid Regurgitation, 3970
  • Mild Chronic Leg Edema, 7823
  • S/P Pulmonary Thrombectomy, 74749
  • S/P Greenfield filter placement into the inferior vena cava, 433

VA DISABILITY AWARD

DATE FILED DATE AWARDED VA CODE PERCENT

8/1996 11/27/1996 6817 60%

8/2011 04/18/2013 7121 40% Bilateral legs

This is not a CUE.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ad

I would still pursue it. I'd write that they made a grave error, possibly a CUE and then explain why. I feel you should have appealed their original decision, then. jmo

pr

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"When I filed for VA disability 8/1996 I was only rated for one condition,"

Did you formally claim the DC 7121 bilateral leg condition in 1996?

Do you still have that older decision and if so, can you scan and attach it here? (Cover the personal stuff...name,address, C file number)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If the VA failed to adjuticate your claim for DC 7121 in 1996, then it is highly likely your preferred remedy is not to file a CUE, but to look into 38 CFR 3.156 instead to earn an Earlier effective date.

Since your decision is within a year, you can appeal the effective date, with an "ordinary" NOD, and you need not make the bar higher to jump over by unnecessarily asking for a CUE.

You see, to win a CUE, it must be "undebateable", while you can be granted benefits with a NOD if you can meet the "doctrine of equipose" standard, asking for the benefit of the doubt. Benefit of the doubt goes out the window with CUE, and is replaced by "undebateable". Dont raise the standard of review for yourself unnecessarily so.

There is also the "pending claim doctrine", where you can allege the VA did not adjuticate your 7121 claim in 1996, but instead waited until 2013. While the VA can "deemed deny" your claim, newer case law says that you have to be reasonably expected to know your 7121 claim was denied. You likely should consider a lawyer to see if he sees an eed for your claim.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was able to find my copy of the Veteran's application for compensation or pension (21-526) that I filed when I got out of the navy and in block 17 here's what is listed:

17. Nature of sickness, disease or injuries for which this claim is made and date each began

USN TDRL 40% Pulmonary embolization; deep venous thrombosis w/ permanent requirement for -- coumadin -- tricuspid reguguritation, -- mild leg edema --- S/P pulmonary

thrombectomy---S/P greenfield filter placement into the inferior vena cava.

Now, since it was listed and VA failed to rate or provide a C&P exam for leg edema, is this grounds for a CUE?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Ads

  • Ad

  • Latest News
  • Our picks

    • OK so I had pancreatectomy in 2003 due to an impacted goldstone 2/3 of my  Pancreas was removed I am type one diabetes with very large scars continued diarrhea stomach problems Constant back and shoulder pain I recently received a Nexus letter from my  endocrinologist related to my service in the gulf war.  Any suggestions or advice from anyone
    • I would like to meet other Hadit members who live in Michigan.  We have at least two major VA Hospitals (Battle Creek, Ann Arbor).  Or maybe you go to the the John Dingell in Detroit.  

      I like Ann Arbor.  I like the fact that most of the doctors there are also at the UM Hospital.  I don't like how uickly they seem to turn over though.  
        • Like
      • 5 replies
    • Really?
      I am confused.  A few days ago I spoke to a person at a VARO who said if I die from something other than service-connected my husband gets zero, zilch, squat.  Hmmmmmm, it seems the rules change willy-nilly...I have been rated 100% P & T for over 10 years, MS is static, and I am 56 years of age.

      Can a fellow Veteran shed a light on this?

      Thank you.
        • Haha
      • 15 replies
    • Fund raising for HadIt.com
      The site is supported through ads and ad free subscriptions, we are also asking for any support you would like to send our way. You can give a $1 or more it all helps. Keep in mind though that it is NOT tax deductible and we are NOT a non profit. As the site grows so do the costs and ads and subscription do not always keep pace with the costs. Any help is appreciated, but not required.
      • 11 replies
    • Carol Ozanecki- Blue Water vet Advocate called me with this news:

      https://www.stripes.com/news/lawmakers-launch-new-effort-to-provide-agent-orange-coverage-for-blue-water-navy-vets-1.525395

      Also there is a article in Pop Culture she sent to me----mentionig Blue Water vets buy I felt it was too political to post here. You can google it if you want to read it.

       

       
      • 10 replies
×

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines