Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Tdiu Appeal Postive With Ellusive Retropayment

Rate this question


tk3000

Question

I got my 100% IU appeal for what have had yet another (second) C&P exam in May of 2013. The good new in this case came along with not so good news: apparently the Detroit Regional office interpreted that the claim for IU that I filed about 3 years ago, and for what I filed a substantive appeal about 2 years ago, simply did not qualify for a retropayment going back to date of the original filing of the claim (3 years ago). My understanding is that the retroactive payment ordinarily goes to the date of original filing of a claim, and not to the date that the second C&P exam (for which the examiner posed a favorable opinion towards my claim) took place (May, 2013). The following is the VA's rational (via IRIS exchange):

Thank you for your advising that you received the notification letter.

An appeal for Individual Unemployability (IU) will go back to the date the evidence shows that you are unemployable.

Your letter indicates that you had an examination on May 16, 2013. The examiners summary is provided on page 3 of the reasons for decision section of your letter.

Your letter states the following:

The criteria for entitlement to individual unemployability benefits have been met. VA grants this benefit, effective May 16, 2013, the date on which the veteran met both the schedular and unemployability criteria under 38 CFR § 4.16, as per 38 CFR § 3.400.

The examiners's opinion bumped up one of my service connected conditions to 70%, and clearly stated that my conditions would affect employability. But the claim was originally filed about 3 years ago, so I did expect to receive payments retroactive to 3 years. .

Any insights would be greatly appreciated.

-tk3000

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 19
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

It goes back to that date if the evidence shows you were TDIU then. What they did makes sense. They made you TDIU the date the evidence(C&P exam) shows you were TDIU. I would appeal. You can accept their rating or appeal it. jmo

pr

Thanks for your input. I accept their ratings, but I simply do not accept the fact the the retropayment did not date back to the filing of the original claim. Based on that premise, all decisions for any claim should go back to the C&P exam date instead of the date of original filing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DO you get SSDI solely for what the TDIU was granted on?

If so does VA have that info and did they obtain the SSA records?

In some cases the VA, if a TDIU app was filed within a year of a SSA award for same TDIU disability, VA will use the SSA date determined to be the date of unemployability for the retro.

If you dont get SSDI maybe now is the time to file with this award letter from VA.

The full SSA disability criteria and I believe the main SSDI application is at the SSDI web site..

Congrats...you did well, this IS a victory.

Did VA Voc Rehab turn you down solely to your SCs during the time since you filed this claim?

"Based on that premise, all decisions for any claim should go back to the C&P exam date instead of the date of original filing."

We would all be hoopin' and hollering if that was the case.

Did you, when you filed the claim,have any solid documented medical evidence of unemployability due to SC, 3 years ago?

Unfortunately the VA seems to be correct here as PR said.

I quibbled over something like this with my Nehmer lawyer for my AO IHD death. claim.

Although the medical record clearly indicated a different EED, the VA used instead a PTSD C & P date, (but this was for an IHD claim)

and I realized it was not worth it to try to get better EED for the IHD. I did appeal the award ,but under a different basis.

The EED I thought I would get was from an ER certificate which was prime facie evidence for my FTCA/1151 cases.

Although that record clearly revealed malpractice on my husband's undiagnosed IHD, (thus establishing the EED for the IHD)

the Nehmer EED was the date of the next C & P exam he had...but it was for PTSD.....that still doesn't make sense to me....

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

tk3000,

Over time us Vets, learn what battles to fight. You know that when we challenge the VA, we usually lose. I have heard of guys challenging the TDIU dates, and the VA comes back and finds a way to deny the already approved TDIU. If you want to challenge it Bud, Good luck, but most of us only wish to be 100% or get TDIU approved. I currently have FDC and SSDI claims and I personally would be grateful for either one to win. God bless and may we all get an early Christmas.

100% PTSD

100% Back

60% Bladder Issues

50% Migraines 
30% Crohn's Disease

30% R Shoulder

20% Radiculopathy, Left lower    10% Radiculopathy, Right lower 
10% L Knee  10% R Knee Surgery 2005&2007
10% Asthma
10% Tinnitus
10% Damage of Cranial Nerve II

10% Scars

SMC S

SMC K

OEF/OIF VET     100% VA P&T, Post 911 Caregiver, SSDI

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Standard operation procedure is to bump up, grant and go as low as possible (lowball) the amount on the due line. You have just encountered the first wall of resistance. Once the grant of TDIU is complete, it is a legal finding. A holding if you will. Unless VA can find some fault or mistake in this grant (TDIU), it is a done deal assuming you proceed in several years to P&T in a future exam. Some would point to the seminal Roberts jurisprudence on the wisdom of continuing to pursue an earlier date. VA decided to make an example of him but it has backfired. The OIG had no authority to investigate him. This will have interesting repercussions when they have to remunerate him for his four-year incarceration. You have one opportunity to complain and that is when the claim is won or in the succeeding one-year period from the date of the decision. If you do not object, it is assumed you agree. If there is unmistakable proof in the record that you were unemployed at the time of your filing and/or in the immediate preceding year, you should be eligible to that date. Remember, we are not talking about evidence developed after the filing date that would substantiate it as VA is trying to do by pinning their "date" on it-but genuine, rebuttable proof that bears out your contentions that you were dead in the water, you should be entitled to the earlier date. SSI/SSD records are, indisputably, good proof but not unless the disease/illness listed as the primary is also the primary rated illness/injury you are asking VA to base it's TDIU on.

Odds are in an appeal, five minutes before you are set to depart to the BVA, VA will grant back a year earlier, find some idiotic, inconsequential date and point to it. It won't be the filing date though unless your case is airtight. Hey, get used to it. They're an insurance co. A dollar granted in 2014 is worth less than a dollar due in 2011 due to inflation. Besides, with no interest due, their philosophy is "Justice (and money) delayed is not Justice denied." I personally think they take great pleasure in it but I know in reality that the M21 computerized Ouija Board is the culprit. It manufactures standard delaying tactics until the piper has to be paid. Well, aided and abetted by a hierarchy disinclined to give VA's money away.

a

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I was granted an EED on my TDIU due to a hospital admission. This hospital admission just happened to coincide with the date of my SSDI grant. When I first filed out the TDIU form I was 30%. I got paid all the way back to the first day I filed for TDIU. I would appeal that ED.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use