Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

Top 10 VA Disability Claims Articles

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Cue For Earlier Effective Date

Rate this question

Dave1433

Asked by Dave1433,

 Share

Question

Dave1433 Apprentice

Dave1433

Posted
Posted

I have read all the recent cases HADIT pointed me to on CUE issues like Moody, Robinson, and Richardson and searched all the topics but I cannot find a topic on point with my issue.

My service rep and I did not specifically file formal claims for my left arm and left leg injuries (due to multiple sclerosis) in 2003 when I filed my initial claim for blindness in one eye (due to MS) and cognative problems (also due to MS). In 2004 I attended a C&P for my multiple sclerosis and the 10 page C&P report had medical jargon buried in it that appears to indicate that my MS was causing some problems with my left arm and left leg back in 2004. The exact medical wording the C&P neurologist used: "he has Babinski in the left" (which I see now after searching the internet means I have a reflex in my left leg that indicates nerve damage) and "left DTRs are hyperactive +2 to 3" (which I now know means I have nerve damage in my left arm). In July 2007 I filed formal claims for the left arm and left leg injuries and was awarded 30% for my arm and 20% for my leg effective July 2007. My service rep and I did not appeal the effective date of this 2008 decison on my left arm and left leg injury so it is final.

I was wondering why the VA did not sympathetically develop the entire range of my available claims back in 2004 to include my left leg and left arm injuries. Do I have a good chance at getting the effective date of these two injuries back to 2004 using CUE?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Answers 2
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

2 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Loose Cannon Proficient

Loose Cannon

Posted
Posted

Dave1433,

Unfortunately, I cannot shed a light as to why the VA did not sympathetically develop the entire range of your claims. I'm sure others will offer their thoughts. I will keep you in my prayers and hope your personal struggles have a happy ending.

I hope you can find comfort in knowing that many veterans are sick & tired of the games the VA plays in cases like yours. Some are disappointed in the services the major Veteran Service Organizations are offering and have found them unresponsive and incompetent in their representation of our claims with the VA.

Don't waste your hard-earned money. The VeteranWarrior group has arrived and are making their concerns known so effective changes can be made. THERE IS NO FEE TO JOIN.

I strongly you to visit this website and see what this courageous group is all about. Read the mission statement, make your own choice to get on board, or let the VA claims process exist as it has for several years.

http://veteranwarrio...m/about-us.html

Thanks Dave. Together we can turn this around for future veterans.

LC

"I ADVISE & ENJOIN THOSE WHO DIRECT THIS WEBSITE IN THE TOMORROWS NEVER TO ADVOCATE ANY CAUSE FOR PERSONAL PROFIT OR PREFERMENT. I WOULD WISH IT ALWAYS TO BE 'THE TOCSIN' & TO DEVOTE ITSELF TO THE POLICIES OF EQUALITY & INJUSTICE TO THE UNDERPRIVILEGED.

IF THIS WEBSITE SHOULD AT ANYTIME BE THE VOICE OF SELF-INTEREST OR BECOME THE SPOKESMAN OF PRIVILEGE OR SELFISHNESS IT WOULD BE UNTRUE TO ITS HISTORY."

God Bless you all and Good Luck.

LOOSE CANNON

For Real Solutions For Positive Change Visit http://www.veteranwarriors1.com/index.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder
Philip Rogers Grand Master

Philip Rogers

Posted
  • HadIt.com Elder
Posted

The why is because it would cost them more money. They should have decided something on your leg then, usually NSC because you didn't mention it in your claim. Check the original decision for mention of anything about your leg, probably on the last couple of pages or the blue sheet.

You could have a CUE and it may be worth pursuing. It may also be an "open claim" because they found something and didn't rate it. The VA is required to rate anything found during the C&P exam. They usually rate anything found but not claimed as NSC. The arm may be a separate issue. jmo

pr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to question listing


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!

  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      KMac1181
      KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      Lebro
      Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      stuart55
      stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      stuart55
      stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      Lebro
      Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter

  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection

      Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection

      Tbird posted a record in VA Claims and Benefits Information,

      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
      Tbird

      Picked By

      Tbird,

    • Post in ICD Codes and SCT CODES?WHAT THEY MEAN?

      Timothy cawthorn posted an answer to a question,

      Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
      yellowrose

      Picked By

      yellowrose,

    • Post in Chevron Deference overruled by Supreme Court

      broncovet posted a post in a topic,

      VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
      Lemuel

      Picked By

      Lemuel,

    • Post in Re-embursement for non VA Medical care.

      broncovet posted an answer to a question,

      Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
      Lemuel

      Picked By

      Lemuel,

    • Post in What is the DIC timeline?

      broncovet posted an answer to a question,

      Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
      Lemuel

      Picked By

      Lemuel,
    View All
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use

  I accept