This May Help A Lot Of Post Vn Vets

[boomer2]

check the link This is good info especially for USAF post VN.

http://www.military.com/daily-news/2014/02/25/study-post-vietnam-troops-exposed-to-agent-orange.html?ESRC=eb.nl

[daklander]

check the link This is good info especially for USAF post VN.

http://www.military.com/daily-news/2014/02/25/study-post-vietnam-troops-exposed-to-agent-orange.html?ESRC=eb.nl

The thing is, the proof has been out there for quite a long time. The AF new about the contamination when they shredded 17 C123's back in about 2000 or so, maybe a bit earlier and made the determination that "Patches" could not be used as a "museum piece" due to the fact that she was contaminated.

The VA is, as they are on Blue Water Navy issues, ignoring the proof that has been around for decades or is just recently cropping up.

You can compare the VA's ignoring the C123 proof to their outrageous stance that dioxin stopped at the land mass or, in the case of Gan Rai Bay, stopped short on a particular line across the bay.

Edited February 26, 2014 by daklander

[Navy04]

It is like POWs from Vietnam all over again. The Govt keeps ignoring evidence in front of them, just to save money in the rear. The Govt does not realize that the more that they ignore us Vets, the harder it will be for them in the end.

[phillipflatt]

I received my LES from DFAS for Dec 1967 with a code of CZE for the month of Dec 1967. My flight from Bangkok stopped in Vietnam to pick up passengers. Is this proof for boots on the ground?