Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Question On Dic For Berta And Other Dic Experts


georgiapapa

Question

Situation: U.S. Army boots on the ground Vietnam veteran recently died from a sudden heart attack. At the time of his death, the veteran had several service connected disabilities with a total 100% P&T rating.

However, his 100% rating had been in effect less than 10 years. The veteran had never filed a claim for IHD prior to his death. The veteran's wife went to the local county VSO and requested assistance in filing a claim for DIC. The VSO advised the wife that she was not eligible for DIC because her husband died from a non-service connected disease. The wife questioned the VSO as to why she would not be eligible since her husband died from a Agent Orange presumptive disease. The VSO stated she would not qualify unless her husband had filed a claim for IHD prior to his death.

Question: Is the VSO correct?

I may be wrong but I believe she would qualify for DIC. On the VA website regarding DIC, it appears she would qualify based on the following statement: "The veteran died from an injury or disease deemed to be related to military service." The VA has deemed that IHD is caused by Agent Orange exposure in Vietnam. The veteran has proof in his VA claim file that he was a boots on the ground Vietnam veteran and the VA has acknowledged that all boots on the ground Vietnam veterans were exposed to Agent Orange herbicide during their service in Vietnam.

The spouse of this veteran is a family acquaintance and her only income is her social security check. I hope she is entitled to DIC because it would make really help her at this time.

Please give your thoughts as to whether or not you believe she is entitled to DIC.

Thanks...Georgiapapa

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Berta,

Thank you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

"The veteran had never filed a claim for IHD prior to his death. The veteran's wife went to the local county VSO and requested assistance in filing a claim for DIC. The VSO advised the wife that she was not eligible for DIC because her husband died from a non-service connected disease. The wife questioned the VSO as to why she would not be eligible since her husband died from a Agent Orange presumptive disease. The VSO stated she would not qualify unless her husband had filed a claim for IHD prior to his death."

You are right.
"The VSO stated she would not qualify unless her husband had filed a claim for IHD prior to his death."

That doesnt matter at all whether he had ever filed for IHD or not....

If he had any cardiac NSC problem and rating on any past VA rating sheet,as IHD or CAD , that would make her a Footnote One claimant.

If he did NOT have a IHD rating but SHOULD have had one on the past on any VA rating sheet,as a NSC disability , ( that was my situation) ,

that also makes her a Footnote One claimant under Nehmer.

I am assuming that she has medical evidence that he had Ischemic heart disease.and that this was listed as the prime cause of his death on his death certificate.

I wonder how many widows this VSO told that BS too..

We have considerable info here under DIC, Agent Orange and Nehmer

She needs to find a better VSO and file the 21-534 forms.

She needs to get a copy of his C file and med recs too , and find his older rating sheets and decisions as well to see if the IHD ( CAD) was ever coded by VA in the past.

Yes she is entitled to DIC but it could take some time for her to see a check.

My AO IHD death award (accrued) took a year and a half or more.


.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Berta,

I printed a copy of your response and I plan to meet with the family (wife and son) later this evening and give them the printed copy of your response. I will let you know when I hear something back from the family.

Thanks again,

Georgiapapa...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use