Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Am I Eligible Or Smc (S) Now?

Rate this question


nwlivewire

Question

First time poster and have a question about SMC (S)

I have been told both "YES!" and "NO!" as to my eligibility to apply.

Can you please help me by providing your answer? And,how you came to logically/legally arrived at your answer?

My situation is as follows:

Army PDRL discharge - APR 2012 - 70% - IDES process (VA/Army both at once)

ARMY RATED ISSUES:(ARMY USED VASRD %)

1. LOWER BACK = 40%

2. R. SHOULDER = 30%

3. NECK = 20%

40 + 30 + 20 = 70%

VA FINALIZED IDES CLAIM - JUN 2012 - RETRO TO APR 2012 = 100% P&T

VA RATED ISSUES

1. PTSD = 70%

2. BLADDER = 60%

3. LOWER BACK = 40%

4. R. SHOULDER = 30%

5. NECK = 20%

6. TINNITUS = 10%

AT THAT TIME, VA "DEFERRED" 3 ISSUES FOR FURTHER ASSESSMENT, BUT ALLOWED THIS 100% P&T RATING/ISSUES TO PROCEED

70 + 60 + 40 +30+ 20 + 10 = 100%

SEPTEMBER 2013, VA FURTHER AWARDS RATINGS FOR THREE "DEFERRED" ISSUES - AND, RETRO'S THEM BACK TO DATE OF ORIGINAL CLAIM ABOVE - APR 2012

(THESE ISSUES WERE PART OF THE ORIGINAL CLAIM, but it took the VA another 15 months to decide and then rate them)

THESE VA RATED ISSUES ARE:

1. ASTHMA = 30%

2. R. KNEE = 10%

3. L. ANKLE = 10%

********************

So am I eligible to apply for SMC (S)??????

Or any other code???

Thank-you very much for your time!

V/R,

nwlivewire

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

<<During the past 10 yrs I've added 20, 10, 10, 10 and 10 but because of the combined ratings table they continue to deny, even though once you're 100%, they can't use the ratings table, as it's similar to double jeoprody(sp)>>

This was what I was referring to, PR, when I said I disagreed with you. The 4.25 table is employed to add everything up. If you have one single schedular rating, and then start adding more, the only vehicle with which to add them is the table. Thus, assuming you have a 100% schedular and the additional ones above, I see 100% plus 48 (50)%. [20 +10 = 28 +10 = 35 + 10= 42 + 10 = 48 which rounds up to 50%]. I expect VA would deny as it's less than the additional 60% needed. I do see VA use the disparate body systems rule as the vehicle to deny frequently. That's what they do. They're rude, argumentative, adversarial and generally always get things wrong. When you get into 3.350 (or 38 USC 1114) law , there has to be a metric to measure what's needed to attain S or the bump you get from an additional 50 or 100% rating that pushes you up one notch from L to M or M 1/2 et cetera.

Winning strictly on being "substantially housebound'' often boils down to a doctor making the appropriate pronouncement on the 21-2680 much like a nexus. It may require some reasoned logic. My attempt to get it in 2009 was denied. They used the argument that some of my problems were not service connected and thus not eligible for consideration. They conveniently overlooked my C&P exam saying "must avoid sun". I expect I'll win it but to do so means never throwing in the towel. I'm glad Mrs. Spotz sees fit to carry the flag forward. I hope you do as well. Each victory, however small, sets the stage for the next Veteran.

One last note. If you do not get S when you feel entitled to it, file for it. I did. Don't ever expect VA to arrive out of breath and say "Whoa, dude. You left some money on the table. Thank goodness we figured it out. Here's the check." When I win my S, I'll come back and tell you wonderful folks all about it. I hope it doesn't take another 20 years as my 100%P&T took.

Win or Die

a

Yes, but it should be simple addition, once you're rated 100% scheduler. The ratings table is used to combine ratings based on the whole person theory vs. the disabled person residuals. Once you're 100% you have no residuals but they still use the table against you. jmo

pr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
On May 30, 2014 at 0:31 PM, asknod said:

Correction. You only need a TDIU rating to qualify for the 100% requirement of SMC S. This was decided long ago in Bradley and Buie. One single disability at 60% or above can be the predicate for your P&T. Once that is satisfied, you begin adding up (from scratch) the other disabilities from largest to smallest using the 4.25 table. If the disabilities are separate and not of one etiology, then you qualify if you go over 60%. Special monthly compensation (S) is not hard to comprehend. If you have separate and distinct disabilities that affect different parts of your body, and they equal or exceed an additional 60%, then you qualify-period.

 

Using what you have listed, add them like this. 70% (PTSD) +60% (bladder)= 88% + 40%(lower back) = 93% + 30%(rt. shoulder)= 95% which is now enough to equal 100% . That's 100% total, not 100% schedular. You still have 30% for asthma, 20% for neck and 10% each for tinnitus, right knee and right ankle. Begin again. 30% + 20% = 44% + 10% = 50% + 10% = 55% + 10% = 60%.

 

Now, if the etiology of the right shoulder, lower back, neck, rt. knee and left ankle is one common cause -say from a parachute accident, you'd have a problem. One single disease such as the PTSD (or the bladder), needs to be held to be a stand alone reason for unemployability or TDIU. This becomes the fulcrum for the P&T rating. Once you attain that as Mr. Buie did, the rest of the ailments are viewed as separate body issues that are unrelated to the PTSD. The bladder alone (at 60%) would qualify you for SMC S all by itself. Don't get caught up in the math of adding 8 or nine ratings up. One, and only one, disease or injury is usually the culprit (and thus the path) for unemployability. Get that if you have not already. Armed with it, the SMC is awarded based simply on your other ratings for different body systems that add up to or exceed 60%.

 

If you attain an additional 100% above the original one granting you P&T, you also will get a bump up from SMC L to SMC M when you reach the higher, more debilitating part of life in the future. The bump carries through to SMC N.

 

I see far too many Vets attempt to string together a pearl necklace of ratings to do this. Focus on the one that is going to kill you or make you unemployable and get the 100% schedular or TDIU for it. After two years, go for the P&T unless it is never going to improve. In that case, go for the P&T immediately. Once you have the P&T, with your other ailments, VA will see it and award you the SMC S. You may have to remind them to do so but most raters would spot that long list of ratings and add it up themselves. With VA, assume nothing (of course).

Best of Luck.

a

Hey Nod I was granted SMC S but they said my 100% isn't P and T? Should I just ask to reopen it, my doctors have all said its just a matter of limiting the damage of my TBI residuals but that it's 99 % permanent after 10 years later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use