Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Ptsd Misdiagnosis Question

Rate this question


OneTime

Question

Hi guys...

Since this is my first post, a quick history:

USA active duty 1999-2005

USA Reserves 2005-2007

OIF 1 Feb 2003- Feb 2004

In 2010 I originally enrolled in the VA healthcare system. During my initial psych eval, I was told by the doctor that I did not have PTSD but was mildly depressed from my recent divorce and was treated for that on an outpatient basis for about 6 months when I was released from care. Since she told me I didn't have PTSD, I never attempted to file a claim.

My symptoms have worsened over the years and due to the urging of my friends, I finally filed a claim September 2013. Last month I had my C&P appointment for PTSD where she said not only did I have PTSD but she thinks I was misdiagnosed in 2010. My claim has since completed and I was rated at 50% for PTSD. The VA is giving me retroactive pay to September 2013.

My question is this:

Do y'all think I should appeal the date back to 2010 on the grounds that I was misdiagnosed in the first place? Do any of you think it'll be worthwhile or will it be a waste of time?

Thank you all for your service and your time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I would not argue with them bud. I was medically retired last year from the Navy. I went thru the new IDES system and I was low balled on my PTSD. The VA rated me only at 30% last Feb 13. I spent 10 Active, and 5 of those years in OIF/OEF. I spent 3 months in a Civilian Mental Hospital while I was stationed in New Orleans in 2012. When I had my C&P for PTSD Increase in Feb 14, the Psych Examiner actually put in the exam notes that I met 100% for PTSD in 2013 when I was retired. So I actually had it on paper that the VA messed up, but I did not fight it. I just made 100%, and when I look at the back pay, It would only be $2500. It was not worth it for me fight it for a few bucks. You can always argue anything with the VA, it is just up to you to figure out the fight. I am 100$, and I just submitted for 5 conditions that the VA denied at first, I have all the MRIs now, and put in for 2 more new conditions that I did not know that I could claim for when I got out last year. This VA stuff is so new to me, but thanks to the good folks on here, and reading all the Govt Policies, I was able to win in the end. God Bless you and good luck.

100% PTSD

100% Back

60% Bladder Issues

50% Migraines 
30% Crohn's Disease

30% R Shoulder

20% Radiculopathy, Left lower    10% Radiculopathy, Right lower 
10% L Knee  10% R Knee Surgery 2005&2007
10% Asthma
10% Tinnitus
10% Damage of Cranial Nerve II

10% Scars

SMC S

SMC K

OEF/OIF VET     100% VA P&T, Post 911 Caregiver, SSDI

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Hi guys...

Since this is my first post, a quick history:

USA active duty 1999-2005

USA Reserves 2005-2007

OIF 1 Feb 2003- Feb 2004

In 2010 I originally enrolled in the VA healthcare system. During my initial psych eval, I was told by the doctor that I did not have PTSD but was mildly depressed from my recent divorce and was treated for that on an outpatient basis for about 6 months when I was released from care. Since she told me I didn't have PTSD, I never attempted to file a claim.

My symptoms have worsened over the years and due to the urging of my friends, I finally filed a claim September 2013. Last month I had my C&P appointment for PTSD where she said not only did I have PTSD but she thinks I was misdiagnosed in 2010. My claim has since completed and I was rated at 50% for PTSD. The VA is giving me retroactive pay to September 2013.

My question is this:

Do y'all think I should appeal the date back to 2010 on the grounds that I was misdiagnosed in the first place? Do any of you think it'll be worthwhile or will it be a waste of time?

Thank you all for your service and your time.

Its not worth it imo. If you ever feel you should be higher than 50%, your claim for a further back pay will prob still be pending and an increase claim won't start until the first is done. Be happy that they didn't low ball you to 30%. My doctors all say I was lowed balled with my 70% rating.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Personally, if it were me, I would. You only have time to lose. You're talking, plus or minus, $18k. If you don't appeal, they win!!! Years ago they awarded me 30% and I jumped w/joy, until I realized they were screwing me. Took me 10yrs but I won back to day one, 100% P&T. jmo

pr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

You can go for higher rating at the same time you go for retro back to time you were first misdiagnosed. If you are unable to work the first thing is to try and get TDIU or 100%. You could include your claim for retro in your claim for increase. For increase you need an IMO/IME. Are you able to work? This is usually the cutoff between 70%-100% level of disability. If you can't work apply for SSDI as well. I basically agree with Phil's idea that if you don't ask you don't get. I don't think they will reduce you. Are you getting therapy for PTSD at the VA or Vet Centers? I would try and find a private shrink or psychologist who would treat and write letters for me. These guys are not constrained by VA rules and will write and say your PTSD is much worse than 50%.

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Lost here a little ....the veterans didn't file a claim

"Since she told me I didn't have PTSD, I never attempted to file a claim."

I don't know how the veteran can appeal the EED they gave him.

On the other hand he could possibly file a claim under Section 1151, if the misdiagnosis in 2010 caused him additional disability.....

one could argue that his PTSD, properly rated now at 50%,was the additional disability.

A lot might depend on whether this statement is documented in the med recs and/or the C & P exam results.

"Last month I had my C&P appointment for PTSD where she said not only did I have PTSD but she thinks I was misdiagnosed in 2010."

"Do any of you think it'll be worthwhile or will it be a waste of time?"

You could use both tactics, appeal the EED with a NOD and file, as a separate issue, the Section 1151 claim.

I suggest referring to the Section 1151 in the NOD for the awarded claim and vice versa, refer to the recent decision in the 1151 claim.

Info here on 1151 claims in the FTCA forum.

The VA ,in my past 2 claims ,acknowledged and paid for , two separate AO conditions my dead husband had been misdiagnosed with that had contributed to his death( actually they never were diagnosed or treated at all by VA in his lifetime as a VA patient.)

They also, 2 years ago , properly acknowledged a Section 1151 issue for another misdiagnosed condition he had.incurred twenty years ago.

The medical records revealed he had all of these conditions they had never treated.......

I not sure if a NOD would work but I would file both the NOD and a Section 1151, because, in my personal experience,

Nothing is impossible ,if one is willing to fight back.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

I see your point, Berta. I missed the fact he never filed a claim. Like you say if his current doctor backs him up then the Section 1151 makes sense. Probably go forward for a higher rating now at the same time he works on Sec. 1151. As you say "Did the exam reference the misdiagnosis of PTSD or was that just talk between vet and exam doctor?".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use