Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • Donate Now and Keep Us Helping You

     

  • 0

Hypertention Secondary To Sleep Apnea

Rate this question


Question

Posted (edited)

Hello all

I am going to make this quick, I hope and not take up to much time.

I was awarded an increase for sleep apnea,

Well I guess I need to tell you what this VA rep told me before i can get to the question.

“He said to me, why haven’t you claimed hypertension secondary to your sleep apnea?" I am sitting there looking like an idiot. Like what are you talking about? Then he explained and it made some since. Therefore, we did the paper work and now we do the waiting. People I did not know there was such a creature as a secondary to anything service connected …

I just assumed that when they finally paid you for what you filed. If there were any other prolems

they were covered then .

It pays to know these things.

Godbless, and were praying that all needs are met and that we all have uncommon favor.

thanks for the feed back guys ,i didnt know but now that you have mentioned it all during my time in service i was border line high my pressure always ran 160 over 80 and around that from looking at the readings that were posted it looks like you were peaking at my records i am certain the secondary connection will be made thanks again for being here and listening ...

one more question what do they rate hypertension as , or what % ?

Edited by ammodad

WESLEY LIVINGSTON JR

  • Answers 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hypertension is connectable to Sleep APnea, It is a serious side effect of SQA. Also check on the following if you have them. Tachycardia, Heart disease,

Posted (edited)

Ammodad -yes this sure is correct info and I just posted some apnea info for a vet in another topic here on it today.

Veteran-I bet the VA sees numerous conditions a vet has that would be service connectable but unless the vet asks them directly to service connect or secondarily service connect-they just wont do it.

I told a story here a year ago of a WWII vet well know at the Bath VA. They had treated him for years and he did a little volunteer work for them and attended the Chapel services on the VA grounds when he could.I think he even lived in the DOM for years.

We were all talking in the social hour after the VA Chapel services one Sunday and me and some veterans were shocked to find out that he had just been advised to file a claim!

I thought the guy was already SCed for decades!

He has PTSD, 2 PHs with 2 GSWs and painful scars for one, numerous COPD problems,hearing loss (Africa campaign) and I think he was diabetic-had a history of alcohol that severely damaged him physically, alcohol free for decades but still some potentially more SC there under Allen V Principi--

and totally disabled per SSA.

In all those years he has been in the VA system no one even advised him to file for service connection.

A WWII vet------ this is just unconscionable that no one did.

Those docs had to realise that his hearing loss and PTSD alone were service connectable.

The VA doesn't tell anyone anything.

They save lots of money that way.

A disabled vet has to practically become a lawyer and a doctor these days to even assess their own SC potential.

It is not fair but this is the way it is.

Do you have any other problems that the aphnea could have caused?

I was alarmed at what I found on the net today- sleep apnea can cause some very severe problems.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Posted

Yet another reason to encourage anyone you're assisting to do internet searches on all of their service connected ailments. It will in most cases spell out what exactly could be a secondary condition/disease to a service connected condition.

Posted

Yeah I was suprised to find out that Hypertension is ratable at either >90 or >140. I didn't start having blood pressure problems until they put me on the depression meds and the high octane pain killers now. Have been over both those numbers by about 5-10 points for the last 3 years. New Dr. put me on blood pressure pills, where the old one wouldn't.

80% SC/100% TDIU

70%PTSD All the rest is Back problems.

10th Mountain.

God Bless the Troops.

Posted (edited)

Read the hypertension ratings in the schedule of ratings. It lists the criteria for the Hypertension.

7101 Hypertensive vascular disease (hypertension and isolated

systolic hypertension):

Diastolic pressure predominantly 130 or more................ 60

Diastolic pressure predominantly 120 or more................ 40

Diastolic pressure predominantly 110 or more, or; systolic 20

pressure predominantly 200 or more.........................

Diastolic pressure predominantly 100 or more, or; systolic 10

pressure predominantly 160 or more, or; minimum evaluation

for an individual with a history of diastolic pressure

predominantly 100 or more who requires continuous

medication for control.....................................

Note (1): Hypertension or isolated systolic hypertension must be

confirmed by readings taken two or more times on at least three

different days. For purposes of this section, the term

hypertension means that the diastolic blood pressure is

predominantly 90mm. or greater, and isolated systolic

hypertension means that the systolic blood pressure is

predominantly 160mm. or greater with a diastolic blood pressure

of less than 90mm.

Note (2): Evaluate hypertension due to aortic insufficiency or

hyperthyroidism, which is usually the isolated systolic type,

as part of the condition causing it rather than by a separate

evaluation.

Edited by jstacy
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • AFguy1999 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Grey Goose earned a badge
      First Post
    • Matrev earned a badge
      First Post
    • Patrol Agent earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Patrol Agent earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • From CCK-Law.com

      VA Disability Payment Schedule for 2025

      VA Disability Rates 2025
      • 2 replies
    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 1 review
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 reviews
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use