Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

How Often , And Who Updates The 38Cfr Rating Schedule/

Rate this question


63SIERRA

Question

It is quite evident that many of the symptoms in the schedule of ratings and symptoms that pertain to disabilities is inaccurate. Who updates this information as new medical discoveries take place.

For instance. decades ago it was believed that spondylolysis was a birth or developmental defect , Now it has been proven that there are 4 different causes including traumatic impact. Many studies were done of the years and no babies were found born with this disorder.. This is widely know in the chiropractic and orthopedic community.

YET the va keeps denying veterans and harping on the same ole outdated information, that they were falsely propogating a decade ago. you have a congenital or developmental defect that is not related to service, blah, blah blah, blah, go away, your denied, adios , ardovior, vamoose, get lost.

So who is it that makes sure the VA is using the most accurate, up to date information regarding medical facts and diseases and disorders. Hell not long ago they used to pull tonsils and appendix out like they were nothing, they have sense found that both organs serve a purpose. (whoever in the hell would think God put something in us we dont need must be an ass anyway}.

If your read the description of some of your claims, you will find that some of the wordage used, is totally off point.

Take scars for example. They described mine as SUPERFICIAL. If you look up scars and types of scars there are 4 different types. none are described as superficial. why do raters describe things in this way? well because it sounds minor/

Instead of saying, veteran has a huge scar, it looks like its painful as hell, and it sure is ugly,. they try to downplay it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Vync is correct. From time to time VA does change the rating schedule or change other parts of CFR.

And everyone can comment on the proposed changes ,when they appear in the Federal Register as many here have done from time to time.

Most amendments and some Bills for those amendments to 38 are different however. Such as the Blue Water Navy situation, where they are fighting to get all Blue Water Vietnam Era veterans covered by the Agent Orange presumptives.

Years ago VA pulled something and did not have a comment period on something they wanted to change..they just posted the proposal in the FR...I think it regarded NHL AO regulations and there was a big stink about that.

VA reads every comment and they are public at the FR site. I have noticed commentors are veterans, non veteran advocates like me, lawyers, vet reps, and , for some hearing loss regs a few years ago, they had multiple comments primarily from hearing aid companies and audiologists who were seeking some sort of fee basis ideas for veterans to get ample audio exams outside of VA.

Which made sense to me...I wonder how often VA even calibrates their audio exam equipment.

Berta that might be another reason the VA is trying to keep a lid on the fee based care, because modern up to date facilities with the most modern equiptment and medical information. will not jive well with thier Roosevelt era va care and compensation standards . When veterans get the proper diagnosis and treatment recommendations from a real hospital it puts the VA in a bind. They cant say that its BS. It also opens the door to more comp claims, because the civillian docs are less likely to lie to the patient.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Yes that's right. Even the IHD regulations changed.

I found that out when VA awarded my husband posthumously for IHD at 30%.

If they had not malpracticed on the IHD, he might be alive and with a 50 % or even a 100% IHD rating.

The Nehmer lawyer I had pointed out to me they would need to use the IHD rating schedule prior to his death.

It changed sometime after 1994 I think.

I couldnt fight that rating because they never diagnosed or treated him for IHD, and it was never listed on any rating sheet.which I proved to OGC he had evidence in his med recs from 1988 up until his demise , and it was part of my additional IHD CUE claim ,that VA awarded under Nehmer.

Other changes to the rating schedule is the SMC "Q" award and probably a few other things too.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use