Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 1

Purple Heart For Tbi

Rate this question


Metoo

Question

I have a TBI rating of 10% amongst other things. I know that a while ago the military started granting Purple Hearts for a TBI injury. Has anyone been sucessful in getting the Purple Heart Award for TBI? I'm currious about the process.

Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Got this off the net. Reading the entire entry this injury must be caused by "enemy action" ie you don't get one if our own ammo dump blew up of its own accord. PTSD is specifically excluded from being an injury for award of PH. Hope that helps.

(4) Examples of enemy-related injuries which clearly justify award of the Purple Heart are as follows:

(a) Injury caused by enemy bullet, shrapnel, or other projectile created by enemy action.

(b) Injury caused by enemy placed mine or trap.

© Injury caused by enemy released chemical, biological or nuclear agent.

(d) Injury caused by vehicle or aircraft accident resulting from enemy fire.

(e) Concussion injuries caused as a result of enemy generated explosions.

Added link later:The text has been cut and pasted for ease of reading & applicability. To see the text in full from AR 600-8-22, 25 February 1995 and Public Law 104-106 - Feb. 10, 1996 visit http://www.usmcvta.org/pheart/phcriteria.htm

Edited by Asomdepot68
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

You brought up a point bud. I have TBI due to 6 Concussions from numerous IED, explosions etc. I did not receive a Purple Heart, then again I am not your typical Vet that wanted any of that stuff. It does get my brain going though. Good luck and keep us posted.

100% PTSD

100% Back

60% Bladder Issues

50% Migraines 
30% Crohn's Disease

30% R Shoulder

20% Radiculopathy, Left lower    10% Radiculopathy, Right lower 
10% L Knee  10% R Knee Surgery 2005&2007
10% Asthma
10% Tinnitus
10% Damage of Cranial Nerve II

10% Scars

SMC S

SMC K

OEF/OIF VET     100% VA P&T, Post 911 Caregiver, SSDI

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

soldiers should be honored for what theyve suffered/ I know when I see a purple heart license plate I tthink abt what the driver may have suffered and would surely stop to help if I saw that plate or any DV plate/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Content Curator/HadIt.com Elder
9 hours ago, blahsaysme2u said:

was anyone able to get any info on this? has anyone here actually gone through the process? this is a thing now but i dont know what the process is or where to begine

There is some general purple heart criteria on the posts from five years back, but each branch may have some different criteria in addition to what was posted.

For example, for the Army I found the following from 2011:
https://www.army.mil/article/60078/dod_issues_purple_heart_standards_for_brain_injury

 

It refers you to the Army HR page, which I found PH in this search list:
https://www.hrc.army.mil/search/purple heart criteria

But the 11-125 directive is protected by login which I do not have:

image.thumb.png.1041d901b26f3cd1772a8e7df043f96d.png

In the end, the very first link in the list contains current details of PH for Army service members. I extracted and underlined the parts about TBI and assume these are current. Please follow the link for more details. If you served in a different branch, you'll need to look up their criteria.
https://www.hrc.army.mil/content/Purple Heart

Quote

When contemplating an award of this decoration, the key issue that commanders must take into consideration is the degree to which the enemy caused the injury. The fact that the proposed recipient was participating in direct or indirect combat operations is a necessary prerequisite, but is not sole justification for award.

Examples of enemy-related injuries which clearly justify award of the Purple Heart are as follows:

  • Injury caused by enemy bullet, shrapnel, or other projectile created by enemy action
  • Injury caused by enemy placed mine or trap
  • Injury caused by enemy released chemical, biological, or nuclear agent
  • Injury caused by vehicle or aircraft accident resulting from enemy fire
  • Concussion injuries caused as a result of enemy generated explosions
  • Mild traumatic brain injury or concussive severe enough to cause either loss of consciousness or restriction from full duty due to persistent signs, symptoms, or clinical finding, or impaired brain functions for a period greater than 48 hours from the time of the concussive incident.

Examples of injuries or wounds which clearly do not justify award of the Purple Heart are as follows:

  • Frostbite (excluding severe frostbite requiring hospitalization from 7 December 1941 to 22 August 1951).
  • Trench foot or immersion foot.
  • Heat stroke.
  • Food poisoning not caused by enemy agents.
  • Chemical, biological, or nuclear agents not released by the enemy.
  • Battle fatigue.
  • Disease not directly caused by enemy agents.
  • Accidents, to include explosive, aircraft, vehicular, and other accidental wounding not related to or caused by enemy action.
  • Self-inflicted wounds, except when in the heat of battle and not involving gross negligence.
  • Post traumatic stress disorders.
  • Airborne (for example, parachute/jump) injuries not caused by enemy action.
  • Hearing loss and tinnitus (for example: ringing in the ears).
  • Mild traumatic brain injury or concussions that do not either result in loss of consciousness or restriction from full duty for a period greater than 48 hours due to persistent signs, symptoms, or physical findings of impaired brain function.
  • Abrasions and lacerations (unless of a severity to be incapacitating).
  • Bruises (unless caused by direct impact of the enemy weapon and severe enough to require treatment by a medical officer).
  • Soft tissue injuries (for example, ligament, tendon or muscle strains, sprains, and so forth).
  • First degree burns.

 

 

 

 

 

"If it's stupid but works, then it isn't stupid."
- From Murphy's Laws of Combat

Disclaimer: I am not a legal expert, so use at own risk and/or consult a qualified professional representative. Please refer to existing VA laws, regulations, and policies for the most up to date information.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use