I Did Not Know They Could Do This

[mos1833]

i just keep finding issues where the law dont mean any thing.

i sure think this is wrong,

below is some of it.

permissible to consider.txt

[rootbeer22]

Wow:

You probably should get a lawyer and have other experienced folks that contribute to the is site advise you on this. I would say this may mean that they do not "believe" you or at least your credibility in filing for your contentions? It seems like this speaks to your personal intent and motives without coming out and saying it? It's really an odd statement? Frankly, evidence is what they should be considering for your claim..frankly, you either have it or you don't? Also, it sounds like a lawyer wrote that...?

[Navy04]

I have a Double Masters in Criminal Justice and Homeland Security, and the sad thing is that there are always Shady Loop Holes in Valid Laws!!!

[Stretch]

plausibility, bias, self interest,

Who elses inte rest would you be concerned with. They sometimes get tangled in there own BS.

[Notorious Kelly]

But giving greatest weight to their hired guns is okay.

[mos1833]

what gets me is that this was a remanded claim for the board to specifically reconsider the claim ,

useing my lay evidence.because they failed to before. all they did was list this bull sh** laws and

never once pointed to a specific peace of evidence that would justifi or proof

in there decision denying the benifits.

[K_C]

There's no respect and definitely no diligence in their response, other than to put the least effort into getting rid of your valid inquiry. Sorry you're being treated this way.