Click To Ask Your VA Claims Question
Read Disability Claims Articles
View All Forums | Chats and Other Events | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Search | Rules
- 0
Agent Orange Double Whammy For Korean Dmz Vets!
Rate this question
Click To Ask Your VA Claims Question
Read Disability Claims Articles
View All Forums | Chats and Other Events | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Search | Rules
Rate this question
Question
Jumpmaster
DOUBLE WHAMMY (AO) DMZ DECISIONS
Two BVA decision for Agent Orange results in a double whammy, or a stroke of luck or two lucky break decisions for Korean DMZ veterans.
Case #1: Involves an MP from 2nd MP Company, 2nd Infantry Division served 1965-1966 at the DMZ and is the first TO win a claim for Agent Orange exposure before the recognized DOD presumptive dates 1968-1971.
See the PDF for that BVA decision
Case #2: Involves a Combat Engineer from the 2nd Infantry Division used scientific evidence that prove dioxin degrades slowly in surface and subsurface soil. The veteran service 1976-1977, at the DMZ started five years after DOD’s presumptive date. This decision should encourage veterans WHO served on the DMZ after 1971 and have a current diagnosed presumptive disease to file a claim and keep fighting to win their entitled benefits.
See the PDF of VFW Magazine article October, 2014.
I hope this information will benefit others that were denied in the past to appeal or file new exposure claims.
Agent Orange Korea DMZ 1965-1966, 2nd MP Company, http_www.va.gov_vetapp14_Files2_1415571.pdf
VFW Magizine Article R on Reigstad DMZ Agent Orange Claim!.pdf
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
3
2
1
1
Popular Days
Mar 6
3
Oct 1
2
Oct 2
2
Oct 3
2
Top Posters For This Question
Berta 3 posts
Jumpmaster 2 posts
Vync 1 post
Navy04 1 post
Popular Days
Mar 6 2016
3 posts
Oct 1 2014
2 posts
Oct 2 2014
2 posts
Oct 3 2014
2 posts
Popular Posts
Jumpmaster
DOUBLE WHAMMY (AO) DMZ DECISIONS Two BVA decision for Agent Orange results in a double whammy, or a stroke of luck or two lucky break decisions for Korean DMZ veterans. Case #1: Involves an
Berta
AO in my opinion ,could have been anywhere.James Scripps proved it was in the US of A. GREAT FIND!!!!!! THANKS A lot!!!! In this case (I havent read the VFW pdf yet) Lay evidence was coobora
Berta
"Didn't mean to ramble on, just don't know why the Govt exposes their own Military to so many environmental hazards, and then denies it." In my opinion, because it takes money and time to really s
9 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now