Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Question About Tdiu?

Rate this question


RockyA1911

Question

I anticipate a decision on my 19 month old claim soon and I'm assuming it should be between 70 and 90%. I submitted the TDIU application back in June '05 and haven't worked since 28 Feb 2004. My only income is monthly CSRS Annuity and VA Compensation, I have no income from wages at all.

I submitted a C&P exam, VA Neuro-Psychologist evaluation, and IMO from a Psychiatrist:

The C&P Doctor for PTSD and Cognitive Disorder wrote:

"The veteran has a letter from a Dr. - - - - stating he is disabled and unemployable." "I will have to say that he was able to hold down a steady job for a number of years which indicates to me had a relatively reasonable level of functioning". "To get a full picture of how much this impacts his daily life, I believe he would need full neuropsychiatric testing, which I have recommended he pursue". The VA C&P Doctor then referred me with an appointment with the VA NP.

The NP stated the reason for the evaluation was requested by the C&P doctor and she stated:

"In social and employment settings, he is expected to be severly compromised".

The IMO Psychiatrist wrote: "Mr. - - - - - is disabled and unemployable".

Is this enough to award TDIU?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder
I anticipate a decision on my 19 month old claim soon and I'm assuming it should be between 70 and 90%. I submitted the TDIU application back in June '05 and haven't worked since 28 Feb 2004. My only income is monthly CSRS Annuity and VA Compensation, I have no income from wages at all.

I submitted a C&P exam, VA Neuro-Psychologist evaluation, and IMO from a Psychiatrist:

The C&P Doctor for PTSD and Cognitive Disorder wrote:

"The veteran has a letter from a Dr. - - - - stating he is disabled and unemployable." "I will have to say that he was able to hold down a steady job for a number of years which indicates to me had a relatively reasonable level of functioning". "To get a full picture of how much this impacts his daily life, I believe he would need full neuropsychiatric testing, which I have recommended he pursue". The VA C&P Doctor then referred me with an appointment with the VA NP.

The NP stated the reason for the evaluation was requested by the C&P doctor and she stated:

"In social and employment settings, he is expected to be severly compromised".

The IMO Psychiatrist wrote: "Mr. - - - - - is disabled and unemployable".

Is this enough to award TDIU?

Sounds okay to me. It would've been better if they stated some rational in stating "Mr. - - - - - is disabled and unemployable." jmo

pr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Rocky

The IMO says unemployable and that is the magic word. If you get at leasat 70% then everything should be in place. You want to work but you are unable due solely to your SC disability..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1968, You need to read this. VA compensation and retirement annuities are not reported as income. Compensation is not reportable as income, neither is CSRS annuity on your tax return. Income from wages is reported as none. CSRS is reported as a retirement annuity on your tax form and even then it is reduced by the amount of your contributions.

Employment and Substantial Gainful Occupation are the key words. I am unemployed and have been since Mar 2004. I retired at age 55 with 33 years ( 11 Marine Corps and 22 DA Civilian Employee). I retired to keep from being fired and losing benefits due to many conflicts with employees and management. This was all related to PTSD and TBI cognitive disorder. See below out of the CFR 38:

[Code of Federal Regulations]

[Title 38, Volume 1]

[Revised as of July 1, 2004]

From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access

[CITE: 38CFR4.17]

[Page 365-366]

TITLE 38--PENSIONS, BONUSES, AND VETERANS' RELIEF

CHAPTER I--DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

PART 4_SCHEDULE FOR RATING DISABILITIES--Table of Contents

Subpart A_General Policy in Rating

Sec. 4.17 Total disability ratings for pension based on unemployability

and age of the individual.

All veterans who are basically eligible and who are unable to secure

and follow a substantially gainful occupation by reason of disabilities

which are likely to be permanent shall be rated as permanently and

totally disabled. For the purpose of pension, the permanence of the

percentage requirements of Sec. 4.16 is a requisite. When the

percentage requirements are met, and the disabilities involved are of a

permanent nature, a rating of permanent and total disability will be

assigned if the veteran is found to be unable to secure and follow

substantially gainful employment by reason of such disability. Prior

employment or unemployment status is immaterial if in the judgment

[[Page 366]]

of the rating board the veteran's disabilities render him or her

unemployable. In making such determinations, the following guidelines

will be used:

(a) Marginal employment, for example, as a self-employed farmer or

other person, while employed in his or her own business, or at odd jobs

or while employed at less than half the usual remuneration will not be

considered incompatible with a determination of unemployability, if the

restriction, as to securing or retaining better employment, is due to

disability.

(:rolleyes:Claims of all veterans who fail to meet the percentage standards

but who meet the basic entitlement criteria and are unemployable, will

be referred by the rating board to the Adjudication Officer under Sec.

3.321(:D(2) of this chapter.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1155; 38 U.S.C. 3102)

[43 FR 45348, Oct. 2, 1978, as amended at 56 FR 57985, Nov. 15, 1991]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use