Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Peripheral Neuropathy And Bilateral And Dmii

Rate this question


Guest jangrin

Question

Guest jangrin

Hi Ya'll,

I was hopeing that someone could explain how the rating works. For example ...if a vet had 20% DMII, and 40% PN bi-lateral in the feet and 10% PN bi-lateral in the hands, 30% CAD. How would the VA rate the disability?

Does the PN ( a secondary) get rated first because it is higher percentage or does the DMII get rated first because it is the primary SC.

Also how does the bi-lateral work? Is it 10% added to feet and 10% to hands or is it Hands and feet percentages added together and then an addtional 10% overall for the bi-lateral factor. This system is so confusing. Any help is really appreciated.

Jangrin and Chuckles :rolleyes: :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 9
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

The bilateral factor is confusing to me as well. I have a 70% rating for a nervous condition, 10% for DMII, 10% for PN in each individual limbs and the VA said they considered the bilateral factor and I ended up with 80% SC. They are taking a percentage of a smaller and smaller number as they approach zero. It still does not seem right if they considered the bilateral factor for both my arm and legs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest jangrin
The bilateral factor is confusing to me as well. I have a 70% rating for a nervous condition, 10% for DMII, 10% for PN in each individual limbs and the VA said they considered the bilateral factor and I ended up with 80% SC. They are taking a percentage of a smaller and smaller number as they approach zero. It still does not seem right if they considered the bilateral factor for both my arm and legs.

John999,

I have read the bi-lateral factor criteria and I still do not understand it. I have a feeling that they take each apendage and add them together then apply another 10% but do they add 10% for the feet and legs and then 10% for the hands and arms. I don't know either. Hopefully there will be some body out there that can answer this. I tried the search but still can't quite figure it out.

Jangrin :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest terrysturgis

jangrin, There was a posting from Wally a couple of days ago and if he sees your post he knows how to answer the percentage questions. He is very good at it bilaterial factors and all. My rating is as follows:

DMII - 40%

PN right lower - 40%

PN left lower - 40%

PN right upper - 30%

PN left upper - 30%

Tinnitus - 10%

Bilaterial factor with the PN ( not sure how that works ) for a total of 94.6 with TDIU equals 100%.

It seems like your husband has most of the same conditions as I do plus I think he also filed for PTSD. It's a bugger waiting, good luck.

Also John999 I thought all DMII claims start out at 20% presumptive. Why would your's be 10%? Terry Sturgis

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Terry

I don't know why I just got 10% for the DMII. I am not taking any medications. They say my condition is being managed by diet and exercise. My last fasting glucose was 169. It usually hovers around the 126 level. I guess I do pretty well on the other test that measures your blood sugar over months the AI something. My SO said as soon as I have to start taking meds for the DMII to reopen my claim for an increase. I was not all that excited about it since it did not mean any more money for me, and my real private doctor said my DMII seemed to not be getting worse. If my real doctor tells me to start to worry then I will reopen my claim and ask for more. I do have arteriosclerosis in my legs so that is a claim right there because it is so very closely related to DMII. You might get that checked yourself. That is how a lot of DMII vets lose limbs with a combination of PN and artery disease. My problem showed up on a CT scan of my leg for another problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest jangrin

Terry,

Your right you and my husband's DMII problems are very similar. Your DMII is at 4o%, I think my husbands should be at about 40% also, he needs to be on insulin, but he is trying to control it with oral meds and diet. He has gotton his blood sugar down from 380 to 190- 230. It has been a slow process.I think they will rate him at 20%. I understand they could rate him at 30% if they feel they need to rate at a catagory that is not established in the rating chart.

But my husbands PN is getting pretty bad. He looses his balance and trips and has had numerous falls and he has lost his grip strength but also lately I have noticed he drops things or fumbles with things. He has lost all the hair on his legs and he probably needs to start on a diaretic as he has swelling in his feet. He's lost about 30 pounds and some more to go but he really is trying. The problem is he can't exercise because of his heart.

I think his PN will be higher than the DMII rating. I really don't understand the bi-lateral rating process.

Wally where are you????? :rolleyes:

Jangrin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I can't give you any info on the %, but PN is a real bitch. Some days I wish I would have just little feeling in either foot. Look like drunk walking, tripping over your feet cause you can't feel anything,.

Don

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use